Re: [BeanUtils] moving the documentation from javadoc to website

2010-09-14 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all, I got success with the dockbook plugin we already used in Apache Cocoon3 and MyBatis (Apache iBatis), it can produce both site and PDF doc... just my 2 cents, Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 6:28 PM, sebb wrote: > On 14 Septe

Re: [BeanUtils] moving the documentation from javadoc to website

2010-09-14 Thread sebb
On 14 September 2010 00:18, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 9/13/10 7:02 AM, sebb wrote: >> >> On 13 September 2010 11:12, Niall Pemberton >>  wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:05 AM, sebb  wrote: I think it's important to have documentation that can be used offline. This appli

Re: [BeanUtils] moving the documentation from javadoc to website

2010-09-13 Thread Phil Steitz
On 9/13/10 7:02 AM, sebb wrote: On 13 September 2010 11:12, Niall Pemberton wrote: On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:05 AM, sebb wrote: I think it's important to have documentation that can be used offline. This applies to the Javadoc which should be in Maven and in the binary jar. If there is any

Re: [BeanUtils] moving the documentation from javadoc to website

2010-09-13 Thread sebb
On 13 September 2010 11:12, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:05 AM, sebb wrote: >> I think it's important to have documentation that can be used offline. >> >> This applies to the Javadoc which should be in Maven and in the binary jar. >> If there is any additional user documen

Re: [BeanUtils] moving the documentation from javadoc to website

2010-09-13 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:05 AM, sebb wrote: > I think it's important to have documentation that can be used offline. > > This applies to the Javadoc which should be in Maven and in the binary jar. > If there is any additional user documentation it should ideally be > available in downloadable fo

Re: [BeanUtils] moving the documentation from javadoc to website

2010-09-13 Thread sebb
I think it's important to have documentation that can be used offline. This applies to the Javadoc which should be in Maven and in the binary jar. If there is any additional user documentation it should ideally be available in downloadable form as well. For example, as is done with Commons Math -

Re: [BeanUtils] moving the documentation from javadoc to website

2010-09-12 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all, according to Phil request, in the Digester we opted including the documentation in the component release, just have a look at the RC1 site[1]. BTW mine was just a suggestion, since as user I find the doc in the site more readable and faster to consult, to you maintainers the last word ;) Th

Re: [BeanUtils] moving the documentation from javadoc to website

2010-09-12 Thread Phil Steitz
On 9/12/10 2:02 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: Hi all guys, in the Digester project we successfully ported the documentation from javadoc package to the site, gaining much more readability, if you agree I can do the same work for BeanUtils, WD

Re: [BeanUtils] moving the documentation from javadoc to website

2010-09-12 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all guys, > in the Digester project we successfully ported the documentation from > javadoc package to the site, gaining much more readability, if you > agree I can do the same work for BeanUtils, WDYT? I'd prefer they stay where they ar

[BeanUtils] moving the documentation from javadoc to website

2010-09-12 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys, in the Digester project we successfully ported the documentation from javadoc package to the site, gaining much more readability, if you agree I can do the same work for BeanUtils, WDYT? Thanks in advance, Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ -