Hi all, according to Phil request, in the Digester we opted including the documentation in the component release, just have a look at the RC1 site[1]. BTW mine was just a suggestion, since as user I find the doc in the site more readable and faster to consult, to you maintainers the last word ;) Thanks for your attention, have a nice day!!! Simo
[1] http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/digester/2.1/RC1/site/index.html http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/12/10 2:02 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: >> >> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Simone Tripodi >> <simone.trip...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all guys, >>> in the Digester project we successfully ported the documentation from >>> javadoc package to the site, gaining much more readability, if you >>> agree I can do the same work for BeanUtils, WDYT? >> >> I'd prefer they stay where they are. >> > > +1 > > Unless the site doc is bundled with the component release (as we do with the > user guide for [math]), or we maintain versioned doco sites (like, e.g. > Tomcat does) we need to be careful about moving documentation from javadocs > to web sites. > > Phil >> >> Niall >> >>> Thanks in advance, >>> Simo >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
