Let's move the ecosystem forward :-)
Cheers,
Martijn
On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 at 05:07, Gary Gregory wrote:
> To use a new Jena version, we would require Java 11.
>
> Raise your hand if this would be a deal breaker for you and why.
>
> Raise your hand to say hi or anything else ;-)
>
> See:
>
> - t
We're (AdoptOpenJDK) are working with Amazon if that helps :-). They're
using a bunch of our build and test scripts.
Cheers,
Martijn
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 19:03, Pascal Schumacher
wrote:
> Isn't this basically the same as Adopt Open JDK:
>
> https://adoptopenjdk.net
>
> or am I missing somet
; Stephen Colebourne correctly summarized the situation[1]:
> Project management must be based on life-cycle, not the
> other way around.
>
> Here below, a concrete plan is proposed in answer to the
> suggestion (of a fork) made by Martijn Verburg[2].
>
> 1. Initial (beta?) rele
Hi Gilles,
That sounds eminently sensible to me as an end user. I'd like my 3rd party
deps to be as small as possible, so a modularised Math is good for me.
Cheers,
Martijn
On 7 December 2017 at 17:05, Gilles wrote:
> Hi Martijn.
>
> On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 23:45:43 +, Martijn
Can this project be forked to a new domain over on GitHub (under the
existing Apache license), split up and then continued in that case?
Cheers,
Martijn
On 3 December 2017 at 11:51, Gilles wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 11:18:18 +0100, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Gi
Has the PMC and the active developers met over a video call to try and hash
this out?
It would be a shame to see this library fall into disuse.
I'd also argue with Jigsaw being the heart of Java 9+ that more modular
libs now make sense.
Cheers,
Martijn
On 1 December 2017 at 14:56, Gilles wrote
Purely as an end user yes I'd like to see another release :-)
Cheers,
Martijn
On 19 March 2017 at 18:27, Gilles wrote:
> Hello.
>
>
> Issues are piling up on JIRA.
> I'm the only one interacting with external contributors.
>
> Is there interest in having 4.0 released?
> [There have been 74 fixes
Hi all,
I had a look through the archives and noticed a conversation around early
Nov discussing getting some fixes contributed to the BCEL lib and doing a
release to support Java 8. Is there anything I can do to help?
Cheers,
Martijn
