Has the PMC and the active developers met over a video call to try and hash this out?
It would be a shame to see this library fall into disuse. I'd also argue with Jigsaw being the heart of Java 9+ that more modular libs now make sense. Cheers, Martijn On 1 December 2017 at 14:56, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote: > On Fri, 1 Dec 2017 19:23:57 +0530, Amey Jadiye wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> >> wrote: >> >> Hello Amey. >>> >> >> >> Hi Gilles, >> >> >>> >>> On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 23:45:45 +0530, Amey Jadiye wrote: >>> >>> Pardon me for pulling this thread up again, I havent read anything about >>>> "Commons Geometry" since long >>>> >>>> >>> Thanks for your renewed interest. >>> >>> (or may be I missed any other disscussion? ). >>> >>>> >>>> >>> Probably not. >>> >>> is someone working on this ? >>> >>>> >>>> >>> It would be a surprise. >>> >>> what is the final decision ? >>> >>>> >>>> >>> There hasn't been any progress towards a decision. >>> >>> >> I'm not sure if "Lazy Consensus" works in these matters ? better take help >> of it, its fast and easy. >> > > By definition, it does not apply when people voice their opinion: > Some did it one way, others did it in another (non-compatible way). > > The strange thing here is that some PMC members seem to prefer > moving Commons Math to "dormant" rather than let the few remaining > active developers do some cleanup in the hope to revivify some of > the code base in a more modern Java eco-system. > > Gilles > > [...] >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
