Re: commons-math, matrix-toolkits-java and consolidation

2009-05-23 Thread Jin Mingjian
I like the idea about the "top level math project":) Is it possible or interesting to host a sub-project for DSL to commons-math?(such as an enhanced Object-supported matlab-compatible script) 2009/5/23 Edward J. Yoon > Hmm. It's a really great idea. > > I think It could be a top level math pro

Re: [VOTE] [math] top-level package name

2009-05-19 Thread Jin Mingjian
the top level package renaming seem rare in the current big java project. Binding the version to the package name is not a common strategy as well.

Re: [math] Re: commons-math, matrix-toolkits-java and consolidation

2009-05-19 Thread Jin Mingjian
Can I ask a question? how about MTJ vs pure F2J? (If I don't use the native part of MTJ.) Can I get more must-have things? is it necessary to introduce a wrapper layer? Best regards, Jin

Re: Please disable continuum

2008-05-02 Thread Jin Mingjian
+1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]