As there is no ldap group for the podling, can you please file an infra
jira with the user ids to be added?
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the CommonsRDF podling is preparing the fist incubating release, and the
> PPMC members need to be granted with access to
n Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
>>
>>> I'm here too ;-)
>>>
>>> Which release exactly? It's possible that we overlooked something when
>>> we moved the remaining commons projects over to rao.
>>
>> Hi Brian,
>>
I'm here too ;-)
Which release exactly? It's possible that we overlooked something when
we moved the remaining commons projects over to rao.
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> the best thing to do, in such cases, is dropping an email to our
> repository fello
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Ralph Goers
wrote:
> Thanks, but I'm still not sure I'll change anything in VFS. I prefer having
> both the source and binary archives built in the same project. With the
> change to the Apache pom the source archive is built in the parent and the
> binary is b
Ralph,
We made the change to easily allow projects to select the tar.gz & zip
source distribution now and it's being staged for a vote today:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1038139
Once this is released and you update to the new Apache pom, you can
select the tar.gz assembly s
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> Henning,
>
> it isn't as simple as you believe. See, for example, this thread:
>
> http://marc.info/?t=12825660982&r=1&w=2
>
> The conclusion was, as I read it at the time, that you should expect
> that users still have to edit their re
p.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen
wrote:
> That makes lots of sense to standardize.
>
> So, if we standardize, IMHO we should standardize on provide both. It
> really is only a single line in the default assembly. No big deal.
>
> -h
>
>
>
> On Thu
> How about users that want to work with sources on platforms where CRLF
> endings are a PITA?
Simply tar.gz'ing the files changes the line endings?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional comm
>>
>> We need both zips and tars of the sources for the actual release (what we
>> push to dist/).
> Brian wants to know why. It certainly isn't mandated by the board.
That gets me into trouble a lot of times. "Because we always have done
it that way" is my favorite opportunity to ask why. You
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 8:25 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 3 November 2010 23:22, Ralph Goers wrote:
>> This is a vote to release Apache Commons VFS 2.0.
> -1 There does not appear to be a tar.gz version of
> commons-vfs-project-2.0-source-release.zip
The source archives should be taken care of by the sta
Hi Neil,
I took care of this here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3068
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> I have added new groupId "commons-daemon" to the
> m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository (previous releases have been published to
> that group id, but not using Mav
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> When you say consistent, what are you referring to? The fact that lang
> has done it once?
>
> It is not the Maven way to change the artifactId when a new major
> version comes out. And since we are talking about the Maven
> "coordinates" (
Hello,
We got pinged by a user looking for the latest commons-daemon 1.0.3 in
Central and they tried to submit it via the bundle process. I did some
digging and fixed it up for you. The details are in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3068 for future reference.
I see that you've got a 1.
13 matches
Mail list logo
