On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 at 17:48, Mike Drob wrote:
>
> But often [VOTE] and [RESULT] are send with the same otherwise subject (and
> sometimes even [DISCUSS] before the vote, on other projects)
However in that case the merged conversations will at least relate to
the same component.
I have not persona
But often [VOTE] and [RESULT] are send with the same otherwise subject (and
sometimes even [DISCUSS] before the vote, on other projects)
On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 11:43 AM sebb wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 at 17:25, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > Should we use (VOTE) instead of [VOTE]?
>
> I doubt tha
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 at 17:25, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Should we use (VOTE) instead of [VOTE]?
I doubt that is necessary.
The GMail behaviour particularly affects the Workflow messages because
the same workflow names are re-used, so often the only differentiator
was the [component_repo]
e.g.
[GitH
Should we use (VOTE) instead of [VOTE]?
Gary
On Thu, Oct 5, 2023, 10:53 AM sebb wrote:
> I discovered recently that GMail conversation mode ignores certain
> subject prefixes when deciding which emails are in the same thread.
>
> In particular, it ignores text in [brackets]; as these were used
I discovered recently that GMail conversation mode ignores certain
subject prefixes when deciding which emails are in the same thread.
In particular, it ignores text in [brackets]; as these were used to
enclose the repo name, this resulted in merging emails from different
components.
The email su
This lazy vote passes with one binding +1 from Gary Gregory (me) and
comments from Alex Herbert and sebb.
Gary
On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 8:28 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> I've not tried to dig into that one. Maybe running with -X will be
> revealing...
>
> Gary
>
> On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 4:58 PM seb
I've not tried to dig into that one. Maybe running with -X will be revealing...
Gary
On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 4:58 PM sebb wrote:
>
> I get the following warnings on the parent pom with Java 11+:
>
> $ mvn clean install
> [WARNING] Unknown keyword additionalItems - you should define your own
> Met
My +1
Gary
On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 8:26 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache
> Commons Parent 62 was released, so I would like to release Apache
> Commons Parent 63.
>
> Apache Commons Parent 63 RC2 is available for review here:
> https:
This vote passes with the following +1 binding votes:
- Bruno Kinoshita
- Phil Steitz
- Henri Biestro
- Gary Gregory
Gary
On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 6:55 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> My +1
>
> Gary
>
> On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 9:48 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > We have fixed a few bugs and added some
My +1
Gary
On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 9:48 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache
> Commons Net 3.9.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache
> Commons Net 3.10.0.
>
> Apache Commons Net 3.10.0 RC1 is available for review here:
> http
The dependabot check is once a week on Friday which is, IMO, just right.
Gary
On Wed, Oct 4, 2023, 7:18 PM Phil Steitz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 1:42 PM Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> >
> > Le 03/10/2023 à 20:18, Bruno Kinoshita a écrit :
> > > Same for me, I prefer to know ahead of time if the
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 at 00:13, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 1:26 AM sebb wrote:
> >
> > The properties are used by the release plugin.
> >
> > But since they are unique to the user, they do not belong in the shared pom.
>
> So they should be blank in the component pom?
No, they mu
12 matches
Mail list logo
