Re: [Vote] Create repository for "machine learning" algorithms.

+0 I am fine with the proposal but I won’t be contributing to it or helping to maintain it so I am hesitant to vote +1. Ralph > On Apr 21, 2021, at 10:05 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hi. > > [This a reboot of the proposal for which the preceding vote > has just been cancelled.] > > Name o

Re: [Vote] Create repository for "machine learning" algorithms.

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 at 18:06, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hi. > > [This a reboot of the proposal for which the preceding vote > has just been cancelled.] > > Name of component: "Commons Machine Learning" > Name of "git" repository: "commons-machinelearning" > Top-level package name: "org.apache.com

[Vote] Create repository for "machine learning" algorithms.

Hi. [This a reboot of the proposal for which the preceding vote has just been cancelled.] Name of component: "Commons Machine Learning" Name of "git" repository: "commons-machinelearning" Top-level package name: "org.apache.commons.machinelearning" Component rationale and scope (copied verbatim

[Cancel][Vote] Create a "machine learning" component

>>> [...] > > > > So currently, IIRC the tally (on creating a dedicated component) is > > Gilles Sadowski +1 > > Avijit Basak +1 > > Paul King +1 > > And several -1 on the initially suggested name; but the proposed > > name has been changed early on to "commons-machinelearning" > > (in order to

Re: [Vote] Create a "machine learning" component

> On Apr 21, 2021, at 2:25 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Le mer. 21 avr. 2021 à 08:56, Paul King a écrit : >> >> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 4:12 PM Ralph Goers >> wrote: >>> >>> Why are y’all having a long discussion on Vote thread? > > Paul King's comments is interesting information that

Re: [COMPRESS] OSS-Fuzz integration

For the record: there is now a private mailing list fuzz-testing@commons On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 at 14:00, sebb wrote: > > It might be possible to set up a dedicated mailing list just for these > reports, privately archived. > RMs could then be encouraged to check the list in the run-up to a > releas

Re: [Vote] Create a "machine learning" component

Le mer. 21 avr. 2021 à 08:56, Paul King a écrit : > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 4:12 PM Ralph Goers > wrote: > > > > Why are y’all having a long discussion on Vote thread? Paul King's comments is interesting information that could bear on people's decision on the proposal (especially the licence'