> On Apr 21, 2021, at 2:25 AM, Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Le mer. 21 avr. 2021 à 08:56, Paul King <paul.king.as...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 4:12 PM Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Why are y’all having a long discussion on Vote thread?
>
> Paul King's comments is interesting information that could
> bear on people's decision on the proposal (especially the
> licence's issue).
The point is that discussions shouldn’t happen on a vote thread. The thread
should be forked into its own [DISCUSS][VOTE].
> As for the question of whether the purported functionality would
> find a better home elsewhere with the ASF, I'm sure what would
> be the conclusion (apart from Avijit Bask's plain preference (?) to
> develop a standalone component, as per Commons' requirement).
>
>>
>> Fair enough. I am +1 (non-binding).
>
> So currently, IIRC the tally (on creating a dedicated component) is
> Gilles Sadowski +1
> Avijit Basak +1
> Paul King +1
> And several -1 on the initially suggested name; but the proposed
> name has been changed early on to "commons-machinelearning"
> (in order to comply with Commons' tradition of full words and
> descriptive names).
> [Please correct if it doesn't reflect what has been expressed.]
>
> Where does that lead us?
With a vote thread that has been open for over 2 months that apparently should
have been a discussion thread. I would suggest you cancel this vote and create
a new Vote thread proposing commons-machinelearning.
Ralph
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
