+1, think it makes sense to widen the community/ecosystem to JVM languages
(which actually use java libs a lot) with their "idoms" and types support.
I also think it applies to Java BTW we should support in version >= 1.5
with annotation support which is used in 90% of cli libs today and enables
mo
I think we should relese 3.7.1 ASAP due to the regression in FTPS
introduced in 3.7.
Gary
Hi Gilles,
Am 20.09.20 um 19:44 schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
> Hello.
>
> 2020-09-17 21:47 UTC+02:00, Oliver Heger :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> once we had a discussion (it must be one or two years ago) whether
>> Commons could support components in other (JVM) languages, too. IIRC,
>> there were no strong obj
While I fixed the bug and the build passes on Java 8 for me, it does not on
Java 11. This could be an issue in the test itself or between the test and
the Apache Mina FTP server embedded in the test.
I'd like to release (or someone else) 3.7.1 to fix the regression in FTPS.
javax.net.ssl.SSLHands
Hello.
2020-09-17 21:47 UTC+02:00, Oliver Heger :
> Hi all,
>
> once we had a discussion (it must be one or two years ago) whether
> Commons could support components in other (JVM) languages, too. IIRC,
> there were no strong objections, but there has never been a follow up.
>
> For a project in S
I fixed the bug in master and provided a test.
Gary
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020, 06:03 sebb wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 16:39, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 6:47 AM sebb wrote:
> > >
> > > Does VFS actually *need* the latest version of NET?
> >
> > Sigh, that's irrelevan
I personally would welcome other languages to Apache Commons, especially
for JVM hosted languages.
We document our Commons project as:
"Apache Commons is an Apache project focused on all aspects of reusable
Java components."
I feel we could expand from "reusable Java components" to "reusable JVM
Resending with a different subject to potentially reach a broader audience.
Am 17.09.20 um 21:47 schrieb Oliver Heger:
> Hi all,
>
> once we had a discussion (it must be one or two years ago) whether
> Commons could support components in other (JVM) languages, too. IIRC,
> there were no strong ob