Re: [commons-compress] branch master updated: Enable GitHub Dependabot.

On 2020-07-24, Rob Tompkins wrote: >> On Jul 23, 2020, at 10:16 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: >> Also, how different is a bot proposing a dependency update from a human >> doing the same? The bot includes far more context about the update in the >> PR comment, too, which is super useful for determinin

Re: [all] Dependabot PRs

On 2020-07-23, Oliver Heger wrote: > Am 22.07.20 um 18:28 schrieb Stefan Bodewig: >> On 2020-07-22, Rob Tompkins wrote: >>> I’m happy to merge them….will get to them by tomorrow morning ok? >> Personally I don't see any value for our downstream users if we update >> our dependencies without actu

Re: [commons-compress] branch master updated: Enable GitHub Dependabot.

> On Jul 23, 2020, at 10:16 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > Also, how different is a bot proposing a dependency update from a human > doing the same? The bot includes far more context about the update in the > PR comment, too, which is super useful for determining whether or not the > dependency i

Re: [commons-compress] branch master updated: Enable GitHub Dependabot.

Also, how different is a bot proposing a dependency update from a human doing the same? The bot includes far more context about the update in the PR comment, too, which is super useful for determining whether or not the dependency is worth updating. You can even configure it to only notify about se

Re: [commons-compress] branch master updated: Enable GitHub Dependabot.

I suggest you look at the PRs directly instead the emails. Gary On Thu, Jul 23, 2020, 21:27 Peter Lee wrote: > Got plenty of mails this morning(which surprised me a lot). Seems they are > all triggered by github dependency bot. > Have been too busy these days. Will try to look into them this we

Re: [commons-compress] branch master updated: Enable GitHub Dependabot.

Got plenty of mails this morning(which surprised me a lot). Seems they are all triggered by github dependency bot. Have been too busy these days. Will try to look into them this weekend. On 7. 23 2020, at 5:12 , Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hi. > > 2020-07-22 18:32 UTC+02:00, Stefan Bodewig : > > I h

Re: [all] Dependabot PRs

Am 22.07.20 um 18:28 schrieb Stefan Bodewig: > On 2020-07-22, Rob Tompkins wrote: > >> I’m happy to merge them….will get to them by tomorrow morning ok? > > TBH I'd prefer to turn them off and reject the PRs. > > Personally I don't see any value for our downstream users if we update > our dep

Re: [all] Dependabot PRs

Also, it occurs to me that these emails are all valid issues based upon valid work. Yes they’re automated, but they’re also going to the list for automated messages, namely `comm...@commons.apache.org `. If that’s too much to handle you can unsubscribe from th

Re: [math] weighted percentile function

> 2. I'm new to apache. Is there a workflow for people to contribute code to the repository? Information is scattered on different web pages. considering you are talking about commons-math, you might create a JIRA ticket first, at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ then you can create a pull

[math] weighted percentile function

For some reason, I need to build a function to compute percentiles of weighted samples. The only formula I found to estimate weighted percentile is: [image: image.png] This formula corresponds to R-7 (one of the current rules to estimate with non-weighted samples.) I have implemented it and face tw

Re: [ALL] CI builds

As Olivier mentioned, that GitBox plugin plus some relatively simple pipelines would make it fairly simple to make every Commons component easily buildable in Jenkins just like how Maven set up their projects. Well, hopefully a little more optimized since their setup occasionally figures out how to

Re: [ALL] CI builds

Hello. Le jeu. 23 juil. 2020 à 13:21, Olivier Lamy a écrit : > > On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 20:57, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > 2020-07-23 12:38 UTC+02:00, Olivier Lamy : > > > Hi > > > As you know the current Jenkins infra is migrating to another CI server. > > > The current commons-* b

Re: [ALL] CI builds

https://github.com/apache/logging-pipelines For more pipelines. On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 06:21 Olivier Lamy wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 20:57, Gilles Sadowski > wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > 2020-07-23 12:38 UTC+02:00, Olivier Lamy : > > > Hi > > > As you know the current Jenkins infra is migrat

Re: [ALL] CI builds

On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 20:57, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hi. > > 2020-07-23 12:38 UTC+02:00, Olivier Lamy : > > Hi > > As you know the current Jenkins infra is migrating to another CI server. > > The current commons-* builds in the old Jenkins infra have been created > > manually and this will be a

Re: [VOTE] Create additional mailing lists for automated posts

Hi. 2020-07-23 8:23 UTC+02:00, Stefan Bodewig : > On 2020-07-23, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > >> If I'm not mistaken, the issues@ ML was intended to keep one >> posted of and reactive on a human discussion happening on >> JIRA. With the advent of JIRA-GitHub integration, the ratio of >> auto-generate

Re: [all] Dependabot PRs

> On Jul 23, 2020, at 5:25 AM, Torsten Curdt wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 4:40 AM Rob Tompkins wrote: > >> Guys...let’s not argue like this. It gets us nowhere. >> > > You are right. > I can see that it is indeed pointless and will not waste more time on it. > Sorry, about adding to

Re: [ALL] CI builds

Hi. 2020-07-23 12:38 UTC+02:00, Olivier Lamy : > Hi > As you know the current Jenkins infra is migrating to another CI server. > The current commons-* builds in the old Jenkins infra have been created > manually and this will be a pain to transfer to the new one and to keep > maintaining manually.

Re: [ALL] CI builds

Hi As you know the current Jenkins infra is migrating to another CI server. The current commons-* builds in the old Jenkins infra have been created manually and this will be a pain to transfer to the new one and to keep maintaining manually. In the Maven project we have plenty of maven-* git repo s

Re: [all] Dependabot PRs

On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 4:40 AM Rob Tompkins wrote: > Guys...let’s not argue like this. It gets us nowhere. > You are right. I can see that it is indeed pointless and will not waste more time on it. Sorry, about adding to the noise.