[crypto] Release Build Requirements

Gary, I compiled the 64-bit Windows build on my Mac and tested it in a Windows VM. It was fairly straightforward with mingw. I still need to cross-compile the Linux builds, but I'm cautiously optimistic that they will be trivial compared to the Windows cross compilation. Everything is easier on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Geometry 1.0-beta1 based on RC3

Hello. Le jeu. 16 juil. 2020 à 06:08, Matt Juntunen a écrit : > > We have been working hard to prepare Apache Commons Geometry for an initial > release, so I would like to release Apache Commons Geometry (full > distribution) 1.0-beta1. > > Apache Commons Geometry 1.0-beta1 RC3 is available for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Geometry 1.0-beta1 based on RC3

+1 ... Good work...keep it up :-) Checked signatures Checked reports, Checked build with java 8 and java 11 All checks out -Rob > On Jul 16, 2020, at 12:08 AM, Matt Juntunen wrote: > > We have been working hard to prepare Apache Commons Geometry for an initial > release, so I would like to r

Re: Proposal for creating a CompositeException in ExceptionUtils

Sample use cases: 1. Perform multiple operations, some failed due to different reasons. Return a CompositeException for the failed ones. 2. Do a validation on some input. I want to collect all different failures, I can throw a CompositeException. 3. In some cases the exception had occurred earlier,

Re: Proposal for creating a CompositeException in ExceptionUtils

What is the use case for this? On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 at 16:29, Adwait Kumar Singh wrote: > > Yes Gary, something similar. However it would differ from IOExceptionList > which creates an aggregated message of all exceptions but loses the > stacktrace via getCause or printStackTrace. > > To be precis

Re: Proposal for creating a CompositeException in ExceptionUtils

Yes Gary, something similar. However it would differ from IOExceptionList which creates an aggregated message of all exceptions but loses the stacktrace via getCause or printStackTrace. To be precise, this is exactly what I am taking about https://github.com/ReactiveX/RxJava/blob/3.x/src/main/java

Re: Proposal for creating a CompositeException in ExceptionUtils

Would it be like Common IO's IOExceptionList or Commons DBCP SQLExceptionList ? Gary On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:01 AM Adwait Kumar Singh < theadvaitkumarsi...@gmail.com> wrote: > To be more specific, I meant a util function in ExceptionUtils. Like this, > > ExceptionUtils.createCompositeExceptio

Re: Proposal for creating a CompositeException in ExceptionUtils

To be more specific, I meant a util function in ExceptionUtils. Like this, ExceptionUtils.createCompositeException(String overallErrorMessage, Throwable... throwables) This would return a CompositeException which would contain all the Throwables and whose getCause() and printStackTrace() methods

Re: [ANNOUCEMENT] Apache Commons Lang Version 3.11

Thanks Gary! > On Jul 17, 2020, at 9:52 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > The Apache Commons Lang team has released version 3.11. > > This document contains the release notes for the 3.11 version of Apache > Commons Lang. > Commons Lang is a set of utility functions and reusable components that > sh

[ANNOUCEMENT] Apache Commons Lang Version 3.11

The Apache Commons Lang team has released version 3.11. This document contains the release notes for the 3.11 version of Apache Commons Lang. Commons Lang is a set of utility functions and reusable components that should be of use in any Java environment. Lang 3.9 and onwards now targets Java 8,

Re: [all] Thoughts on build system maven -> gradle??

I agree with Gary.   I know its been decided but I thought I would add my -1. Technology better have a compelling reason to switch and in the past we have had: Ant -> Maven was a big leap for convention over configuration and dependency management SVN -> GIT was a big leap for the handling

Re: [all] on automating signature validation (Was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Geometry 1.0-beta1 based on RC3)

Pardon…my email threads got crossed there…a little too busy…will reply to vote thread. -Rob > On Jul 17, 2020, at 9:01 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > Yes > >> On Jul 17, 2020, at 7:38 AM, Matt Juntunen wrote: >> >> Hi Rob, >> >> Just to be clear, your +1 is for the commons-geometry release ba

Re: [all] on automating signature validation (Was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Geometry 1.0-beta1 based on RC3)

Yes > On Jul 17, 2020, at 7:38 AM, Matt Juntunen wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > Just to be clear, your +1 is for the commons-geometry release based on rc3? > > -Matt > > From: Rob Tompkins > Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2020 11:19 PM > To: Commons Developers List > Subje

Re: [all] Thoughts on build system maven -> gradle??

Hi Rob, Even though I am on the minus side, I am glad you brought this up for discussion. I think it helped us better understand where we are, how we got here, and why we want to stay. Gary On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 7:25 AM Rob Tompkins wrote: > Very much appreciation guys for the thoughtful wor

Proposal for creating a CompositeException in ExceptionUtils

Hi Commons devs, Use case : Ability to a single exceptions with multiple causes. This required in validation or initialization scenarios for example when I want to Validation/Initialization failures for multiple reasons and each reason having a unique cause. RxJava provides something similar

Re: [all] on automating signature validation (Was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Geometry 1.0-beta1 based on RC3)

Hi Rob, Just to be clear, your +1 is for the commons-geometry release based on rc3? -Matt From: Rob Tompkins Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2020 11:19 PM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [all] on automating signature validation (Was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache

Re: [all] Thoughts on build system maven -> gradle??

Very much appreciation guys for the thoughtful words and opinions here. Sounds like we’re sticking with Maven. :-) I hope everyone is doing well these days. Cheers, -Rob > On Jul 17, 2020, at 4:24 AM, Thomas Vandahl wrote: > > On 17.07.20 10:13, Claude Warren wrote: >> -1 from me. I have a

JDK 15 is now in Rampdown Phase Two

Hi Benedikt, ** *Per the JDK 15 schedule, we are in Rampdown Phase Two* *[1]* Per the JDK Release Process [2] we now turn our focus to *P1 and P2 bugs*, which can be fixed with approval [3]. Late enhancements are still possible, with approval [4], but the bar is now extraordinarily high. **

Re: [all] Thoughts on build system maven -> gradle??

On 17.07.20 10:13, Claude Warren wrote: > -1 from me. I have a philosophical objection. Same here: -1 > Much like HTTP's mod_rewrite[1] gradle's greatest strength is that it > allows the developer to do so much in so many ways. But its greatest > weakness is that it allows the developer to do s

Re: [all] Thoughts on build system maven -> gradle??

-1 from me. I have a philosophical objection. Much like HTTP's mod_rewrite[1] gradle's greatest strength is that it allows the developer to do so much in so many ways. But its greatest weakness is that it allows the developer to do so much in so many ways. My experience with Ant and Gradle is t