Pardon…my email threads got crossed there…a little too busy…will reply to vote 
thread.

-Rob

> On Jul 17, 2020, at 9:01 AM, Rob Tompkins <chtom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Yes
> 
>> On Jul 17, 2020, at 7:38 AM, Matt Juntunen <matt.juntu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Rob,
>> 
>> Just to be clear, your +1 is for the commons-geometry release based on rc3?
>> 
>> -Matt
>> ________________________________
>> From: Rob Tompkins <chtom...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2020 11:19 PM
>> To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [all] on automating signature validation (Was: Re: [VOTE] 
>> Release Apache Commons Geometry 1.0-beta1 based on RC3)
>> 
>> +1 ... Good work...keep it up :-)
>> 
>> Checked signatures
>> Checked reports,
>> Checked build with java 8 and java 11
>> 
>> All checks out
>> 
>> -Rob
>> 
>>> On Jul 16, 2020, at 8:53 PM, Rob Tompkins <chtom...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Jul 16, 2020, at 7:43 PM, Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hello.
>>>> 
>>>>>> Le ven. 17 juil. 2020 à 00:37, Rob Tompkins <chtom...@gmail.com> a écrit 
>>>>>> :
>>>>> 
>>>>> Woof….lots of submodules make for hard signature validation of the maven 
>>>>> signatures.
>>>> 
>>>> I still don't get why this check cannot be automated (cf. other thread on 
>>>> that
>>>> subject where the same question remained unanswered).
>>> 
>>> I’m yet working on that automation. I quite agree. Although, having the 
>>> multiple modules does require that the automation be slightly tailored to 
>>> the collection of modules, which I’m totally on board with.
>>> 
>>> Still curious to hear what MarkT may have to say there as he knows more of 
>>> the subtleties there than I do. (I may ping and ask for his advice)
>>> 
>>> -Rob
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> Will need time to go through all of the files in nexus….
>>>> 
>>>> Possibly one reason why fewer and fewer people participate in votes about
>>>> release of a component (where s/lots of submodules/lots of components/
>>>> makes for an equally true remark)
>>>> 
>>>>> will try to get to it tonight.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Gilles
>>>> 
>>>>> [...]
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to