On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 5:46 PM Geoffrey Blake
wrote:
> So, I built commons-crypto against SSL 1.0.2n on Ubuntu 18.04LTS and
> all the tests pass. The code coverage bumps to 72%, I'm guessing if I
> did Mac we'd see the 73% coverage seen from Travis CI.
>
> @Gary, what should a reasonable covera
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 7:01 PM Alex Remily wrote:
> I've seen the expected exception error, but rarely and I've never been able
> to reproduce it. I'm surprised it's come up on Travis because it's only
> come up a few times for me in the hundreds of builds I've done. Maybe we
> log it as a bug
I've seen the expected exception error, but rarely and I've never been able
to reproduce it. I'm surprised it's come up on Travis because it's only
come up a few times for me in the hundreds of builds I've done. Maybe we
log it as a bug just to document it, but like I said, I don't know how to
re
So, I built commons-crypto against SSL 1.0.2n on Ubuntu 18.04LTS and
all the tests pass. The code coverage bumps to 72%, I'm guessing if I
did Mac we'd see the 73% coverage seen from Travis CI.
@Gary, what should a reasonable coverage target be? 73% is not great,
but not sure how much higher thi
