Re: [VFS] Disallowed dependencies in build? (was Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons-VFS2 2.1 rc0)

Am Tue, 03 May 2016 21:47:43 -0400 schrieb Josh Elser : > See the original point of me starting this thread: it was stated that > the sandbox (might) depend on code which is not licensed in such a > manner that is allowed for ASF projects. Which is why it is not built or shipped by default and

[VFS] WIP specific release instructions

Here's what I've been doing. The generic instructions are woefully incomplete (before someone chimes in again - no, not just because "VFS is a multi-module project"). I think I have this on point for rc1, so I'm writing it down here before I forget (we can figure out where it *should* go later)

[VOTE] Apache Commons VFS 2.1 rc1

All, Please consider the following for Apache Commons VFS2 version 2.1 (rc1). Maven repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1163 Artifacts: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/vfs/ r13511 MD5 commons-vfs-distribution-2.1-bin.tar.gz 1192914d

RE: [CRYPTO] How to build CRYPTO on Mac OS 10.11?

Hi Benedikt, Hope this information will be helpful 1. Upgrade openssl to 1.0.1c above using brew(http://brew.sh/)[1]: Check your openssl version, by default it's not 1.0.1 $openssl version OpenSSL 0.9.8r 8 Feb 2011 $ brew search openssl $ brew install homebrew/versions/openssl101 $ brew link ope

RE: [CRYPTO] How to build CRYPTO on Mac OS 10.11?

Yes, just we talked in JIRA, we will have a developer guide to cover both Linux and Mac OS currently. Thank you Benedikt. Regards, Haifeng -Original Message- From: Benedikt Ritter [mailto:brit...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 12:39 AM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re:

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Commons-VFS2 2.1 rc0

I know that RM'ing can be a PITA. I'm grateful you are willing to put the time in :-) Gary On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 6:53 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > Don't thank me yet, we haven't gotten the release out ;) > > > Gary Gregory wrote: > >> Thanks for RM'ing Josh! We're long overdue for a VFS release. >>

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Commons-VFS2 2.1 rc0

Don't thank me yet, we haven't gotten the release out ;) Gary Gregory wrote: Thanks for RM'ing Josh! We're long overdue for a VFS release. Gary On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Josh Elser wrote: This vote fails with one -1 and nothing else. Going to be trying to roll an rc1 with the feedbac

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Commons-VFS2 2.1 rc0

Thanks for RM'ing Josh! We're long overdue for a VFS release. Gary On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > This vote fails with one -1 and nothing else. > > Going to be trying to roll an rc1 with the feedback given so far. > > Josh Elser wrote: > >> All, >> >> Please consider the fo

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Commons-VFS2 2.1 rc0

This vote fails with one -1 and nothing else. Going to be trying to roll an rc1 with the feedback given so far. Josh Elser wrote: All, Please consider the following for Apache Commons VFS2 version 2.1 (rc0). Maven repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons

Re: [VFS] Disallowed dependencies in build? (was Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons-VFS2 2.1 rc0)

Bernd-- See the original point of me starting this thread: it was stated that the sandbox (might) depend on code which is not licensed in such a manner that is allowed for ASF projects. Bernd Eckenfels wrote: Hello, the sandbox works perfectly fine for me. Why do you think it is not ready f

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons-VFS2 2.1 rc0

sebb wrote: > mvn site:stage is used expressly for this purpose. Maven has no problems > with properly constructed multi-module projects -- it's a fallacy that Maven > cannot handle multi-module projects well. [Since Maven knows it is a multi-module project it should not need a different com

Re: [ALL] Dist layout change to per version directories

Because e.g. Math 2.2 was released on 2013-03-03 - a "re-release" of 2.2 at a new location is unexpected - at least if the old location goes 404. You are right that my approach would not make 2.1 available in the new layout - which I think there is not much point in as naturally there are other i

[VALIDATOR] CheckDigit implementation for German identity cards?

Hello, I have the need for a validator implementation that can check German identity card numbers. It's pretty simple to implement something like this using ModulusCheckDigit. Now I'm wondering whether this would be a good addition for [validator]. It is specific to German identity cards, but mayb

Re: [VFS] Disallowed dependencies in build? (was Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons-VFS2 2.1 rc0)

Hello, the sandbox works perfectly fine for me. Why do you think it is not ready for release (beside we do not want to?) I dont think we should burden such structural and long standing changes onto a voluntary release manager given the 2.0 had the same structure. Gruss Bernd Am Tue, 3 May 2016

Re: [CSV] Some tweaks for working with headers

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Gary Gregory schrieb am Di., 3. Mai 2016 um > 20:16 Uhr: > > > @Benedikt: Would you be able to RM these and what is trunk out in to > > release? > > > > I was already thinking about this, we have a lot of nice new things in > trunk. I'll

Re: [CSV] Some tweaks for working with headers

Gary Gregory schrieb am Di., 3. Mai 2016 um 20:16 Uhr: > @Benedikt: Would you be able to RM these and what is trunk out in to > release? > I was already thinking about this, we have a lot of nice new things in trunk. I'll be on vacation next week. If I can't manage to push an RC out this week, I

Re: [CSV] Some tweaks for working with headers

@Benedikt: Would you be able to RM these and what is trunk out in to release? Gary On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > I have created CSV-179 [1] and CSV-180 [2] for this. > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CSV-179 > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CSV-

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons-VFS2 2.1 rc0

On 3 May 2016 at 18:25, Josh Elser wrote: > sebb wrote: >> Ideally the duplicate archives should be dropped, but that is not a >> blocker, just a nuisance when reviewing. >>> >>> > >>> > >>> > Yeah, I'll try to figure out what's going on with that when I roll >>> > rc1. I'm >>> >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons-VFS2 2.1 rc0

sebb wrote: >> Ideally the duplicate archives should be dropped, but that is not a >> blocker, just a nuisance when reviewing. > > > Yeah, I'll try to figure out what's going on with that when I roll rc1. I'm > not sure since it's not pulling directly from the apache.pom (I'm not sure > wha

Re: [VFS] Disallowed dependencies in build? (was Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons-VFS2 2.1 rc0)

sebb wrote: +1 along with someone to own this and do the proper diligence as a PMC > member to make sure that we're violating policy. It would be easy to_ensure_ a violation ... ! Since sandbox is not ready for release, for the purpose of getting a VFS release out it should be moved to a bra

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons-VFS2 2.1 rc0

On 3 May 2016 at 18:08, Josh Elser wrote: > sebb wrote: >>> >>> > Sebb -- would addressing these points in the release notes cause you >>> > to >>> > change your -1 to a +1? I'd like to make all the changes I can ASAP >>> > and roll >>> > the next RC. Because I haven't said it explicitly -- tha

Re: [VFS] Disallowed dependencies in build? (was Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons-VFS2 2.1 rc0)

On 3 May 2016 at 18:04, Josh Elser wrote: > sebb wrote: >> >> On 3 May 2016 at 01:43, Josh Elser wrote: >>> >>> Binaries are not an official release anyways. >> >> >> But that does not mean they can include software that is incompatible >> with the AL, because end users expect (and we tell them)

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons-VFS2 2.1 rc0

sebb wrote: > Sebb -- would addressing these points in the release notes cause you to > change your -1 to a +1? I'd like to make all the changes I can ASAP and roll > the next RC. Because I haven't said it explicitly -- thanks for taking the > time to give all of the feedback that you have al

Re: [VFS] Disallowed dependencies in build? (was Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons-VFS2 2.1 rc0)

sebb wrote: On 3 May 2016 at 01:43, Josh Elser wrote: Binaries are not an official release anyways. But that does not mean they can include software that is incompatible with the AL, because end users expect (and we tell them) that the software comes under AL 2.0. I didn't mean to imply tha

Re: [CRYPTO] How to build CRYPTO on Mac OS 10.11?

Chen, Haifeng schrieb am Di., 3. Mai 2016 um 03:49 Uhr: > Sorry to not response in the past days due to Holiday here. > We will start to check that. I agree that JNA is a good thing to try as > long as the performance impact is in an acceptable level. > It would be good enough for me to have som

Re: [CSV] Some tweaks for working with headers

I have created CSV-179 [1] and CSV-180 [2] for this. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CSV-179 [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CSV-180 Gary Gregory schrieb am So., 1. Mai 2016 um 22:26 Uhr: > This all sounds good to me. > > Gary > On May 1, 2016 12:05 PM, "Benedikt Ritter" w

Re: [ALL] Dist layout change to per version directories

On 3 May 2016 at 11:13, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > Trying to summarize here.. :) > > On 25 April 2016 at 10:49, sebb wrote: > Does it really matter if the URL changes more than just a version string? >>> Yes, >> I don't understand why that should be. >> Can you explain in more detail? > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons-VFS2 2.1 rc0

On 3 May 2016 at 01:37, Josh Elser wrote: > Josh Elser wrote: >> >> sebb wrote: >>> >>> On 2 May 2016 at 15:00, Josh Elser wrote: > Also, please re-read the end of the previous thread on compatibility. > > I clearly stated that there were some changes which I consider not

Re: [VFS] Disallowed dependencies in build? (was Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons-VFS2 2.1 rc0)

On 3 May 2016 at 01:43, Josh Elser wrote: > Binaries are not an official release anyways. But that does not mean they can include software that is incompatible with the AL, because end users expect (and we tell them) that the software comes under AL 2.0. Depending on incompatible software is a d

[Math] Feedback requested on MATH-1333

Hi. This report https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1333 was marked as "Major Bug". Wasn't it serious enough to warrant being fixed before releasing the 3.6.1 bug-fix version of CM? I think that it deserve to be dealt with in one way or another i.e.: * "Wont't Fix" (Why?) * Fix, and

Build failed in Jenkins: Commons-CRYPTO-JDK1.6 #1

See -- Started by user sdp [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on ubuntu3 (Ubuntu ubuntu legacy-ubuntu) in workspace

Build failed in Jenkins: Commons-CRYPTO-JDK1.6 » Apache Commons Crypto #1

See -- Established TCP socket on 50531 maven3-agent.jar already up to date maven3-interceptor.jar already up to date maven3-interceptor-commons.jar already up to date

Jenkins build is back to normal : Commons-CRYPTO-JDK1.8 » Apache Commons Crypto #2

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [Math] About MATH-667 (Complex numbers)

Hi. On Mon, 2 May 2016 20:51:32 +0200, Eric Barnhill wrote: Reading over the discussion, there were some contrasting views about which of the common complex number behaviors Complex() ought to emulate. One commentator suggested GNU Octave. My quick take is that Octave has some good momentum righ

Re: [ALL] Dist layout change to per version directories

Trying to summarize here.. :) On 25 April 2016 at 10:49, sebb wrote: >>> Does it really matter if the URL changes more than just a version string? >> Yes, > I don't understand why that should be. > Can you explain in more detail? Mainly in download recipes with a URL pattern patterns using ${ve

Jenkins build is back to normal : Commons-CRYPTO #25

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Jenkins build is back to normal : Commons-CRYPTO » Apache Commons Crypto #25

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org