Jenkins build is back to normal : Commons-FileUpload #7

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Build failed in Jenkins: Commons-FileUpload #6

See -- Started by user jochen [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on beam3 (beam) in workspace Updating http://svn.a

Build failed in Jenkins: Commons-FileUpload #5

See -- Started by user jochen [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on beam3 (beam) in workspace Updating http://svn.a

Build failed in Jenkins: Commons-FileUpload #4

See -- Started by user jochen [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on beam3 (beam) in workspace Unpacking https://re

RE: [CRYPTO] Git repository requested

Thanks Uma for the information. Yes, it should be already granted. We just need to wait the lock to be lifted. Regards, Haifeng -Original Message- From: Gangumalla, Uma [mailto:uma.ganguma...@intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 11:37 AM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [

Re: [CRYPTO] Git repository requested

Looks like access already has been granted. Please looks here if any one missing. http://home.apache.org/phonebook.html?unix=commons Regards, Uma On 4/19/16, 7:40 PM, "Chen, Haifeng" wrote: >Thanks for the reminding. Confirmed that the code imported correctly. Has >commented there and wait for

RE: [CRYPTO] Git repository requested

Thanks for the reminding. Confirmed that the code imported correctly. Has commented there and wait for the lock to be lifted. The building, renaming and doc tasks are in working and the tracking JIRAs have been created. Benedikt, one thing to check, does the initial committers already gain write

[Math] Clarification of development model with Git

Hello. Let's assume the following: * Some feature branch has been pushed to the Apache repository. * That branch fixes an issue reported in JIRA. * Nobody has raised an objection after some time[1] has passed. Can we conclude that the code in that branch has been (lazily) accepted and can be mer

Re: [commons-math] Git Push Summary

On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:53:25 + (UTC), er...@apache.org wrote: Repository: commons-math Updated Branches: refs/heads/feature-MATH-1290 [deleted] 90662a962 I had to delete that branch[1]; I've recreated a new one with the same name. [Hopefully nobody was tracking the old one.] Gilles [1]

[VOTE][LAZY] Release Commons Build Plugin 1.6 based on RC2

This is a VOTE by LAZY consensus to release Commons Build Plugin 1.6 based on RC2 The changes from 1.5 are: Added new download-page subdir property: set this (e.g. to '1.2' or 'lang-1.2' etc) to override the default of binaries/source The differences from RC1 are: - the directory name is variabl

Re: [MATH] Jenkins jobs

On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 15:06:00 +0100, sebb wrote: On 19 April 2016 at 14:14, Gilles wrote: On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 13:59:26 +0100, sebb wrote: I changed https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/Commons Math/ recently from */master to */develop. But I now see that there are 3 other Math jobs: https

[CLI] Request for bug information (regarding [CLI-255])

Can someone tell me if it is ok to use long option with a single dash .

Build failed in Jenkins: Commons-FileUpload #3

See -- Started by user sebb [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on ubuntu-1 (docker Ubuntu ubuntu yahoo-not-h2 ubuntu1) in workspace

[CANCELLED][VOTE][ALL] (lazy consensus) Commons Parent 40 based on RC2

There is a regression (no longer buildable with Java 1.6 due to felix and build-helper changes) Also some other updates are being made On 19 April 2016 at 15:02, sebb wrote: > On 19 April 2016 at 00:59, sebb wrote: >> On 19 April 2016 at 00:02, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: >>> Sorry, I'll have t

Re: svn commit: r1739951 - /commons/proper/commons-parent/trunk/src/site/site.xml

On 19 April 2016 at 17:07, Gary Gregory wrote: > Sebb, > > So you are migrating to the 3.5.1 site plugin anyway? No, I was testing and committed in error. > It's fine with me. > Is the CDATA stuff compat with 3.4? It must be... Unfortunately not. Adding CDATA does not cause any processing err

Fwd: svn commit: r1739951 - /commons/proper/commons-parent/trunk/src/site/site.xml

Sebb, So you are migrating to the 3.5.1 site plugin anyway? It's fine with me. Is the CDATA stuff compat with 3.4? It must be... Gary -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 9:01 AM Subject: svn commit: r1739951 - /commons/proper/commons-parent/trunk/src/site/si

Re: [ALL] Use apache- prefix in dist?

-1 Too long, not needed. I prefer a naming consistent with the previous releases. Emmanuel Bourg Le 18/04/2016 14:28, Stian Soiland-Reyes a écrit : > For the download distributions, we might want to include the "apache-" > file prefix for trademark > reasons - as advocated to all incubator proj

Re: [ALL] Use apache- prefix in dist?

+1. I like adding 'apache-' as a prefix. Other Apache projects do this: Ant, Cassandra, CXF, Ivy, JMeter, Log4j, Maven, Mina, Nutch, Solr, Sshd, Tomcat, and I am sure others as well. Gary On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > For the download distributions, we might wa

Re: [MATH] Jenkins jobs

On 19 April 2016 at 14:14, Gilles wrote: > On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 13:59:26 +0100, sebb wrote: >> >> I changed >> >> https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/Commons Math/ recently from >> */master to */develop. >> >> But I now see that there are 3 other Math jobs: >> >> https://builds.apache.org/view/A

Re: [VOTE][ALL] (lazy consensus) Commons Parent 40 based on RC2

On 19 April 2016 at 00:59, sebb wrote: > On 19 April 2016 at 00:02, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: >> Sorry, I'll have to change that to -1 as the pom fails with Java 6 and >> Maven 3.0.5 > > Not sure we can do anything about that. > > Nor is it necessary, as that is why the java-1.x profiles exist.

Re: [Math] "Help wanted!" Or not (?)

On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 10:16:45 -0500, Matt Sicker wrote: I was under the impression that commons-math was the most frequently contributed to subproject around here lately. Hard to call that legacy. There is a profound unbalance between the amount of code in (and scope of) Commons Math and the n

Re: [Math] "Help wanted!" Or not (?)

On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 22:55:34 +0200, Eric Barnhill wrote: I don't see commons-math as legacy code. It depends on the meaning of "legacy code": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legacy_code The first definition in the above reference could very apply to Commons Math, in particular with respect to

Re: [Math] Branch "master" modified, should have been "develop" (Was: [math] Standard Maven directory layout)

On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:55:51 +0100, sebb wrote: Thanks, sorry again for the mess. No problem. I'm also not familiar with Git; today I learnt about "git revert". :-) Gilles On 19 April 2016 at 12:07, Gilles wrote: On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 01:00:36 +0100, sebb wrote: Sorry, my mistake. Feel fr

Re: [MATH] Jenkins jobs

On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 13:59:26 +0100, sebb wrote: I changed https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/Commons Math/ recently from */master to */develop. But I now see that there are 3 other Math jobs: https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/Commons Math DeveloperBranch/ https://builds.apache.org/vie

[MATH] Jenkins jobs

I changed https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/Commons Math/ recently from */master to */develop. But I now see that there are 3 other Math jobs: https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/Commons Math DeveloperBranch/ https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/Commons Math H10/ https://builds.apache.

Re: [Math] Branch "master" modified, should have been "develop" (Was: [math] Standard Maven directory layout)

Thanks, sorry again for the mess. On 19 April 2016 at 12:07, Gilles wrote: > On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 01:00:36 +0100, sebb wrote: >> >> Sorry, my mistake. >> >> Feel free to revert (I'm not very familiar with Git) > > > I moved your commit to "develop". > > Gilles > >> On 19 April 2016 at 00:38, Gille

Re: [Math] Branch "master" modified, should have been "develop" (Was: [math] Standard Maven directory layout)

On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 01:00:36 +0100, sebb wrote: Sorry, my mistake. Feel free to revert (I'm not very familiar with Git) I moved your commit to "develop". Gilles On 19 April 2016 at 00:38, Gilles wrote: Hi. Is there a reason why those changes were done in "master" rather than "develop"?

[Math] CI configuration (Was: Build failed in Jenkins: Commons Math #464)

Hi. Another necessary adaptation to the configuration is that the snapshots should be created from branch "develop", not "master". [The latter is useless since it will be equivalent to the released version (cf. "doc/development.txt").] Regards, Gilles On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 00:16:40 + (UTC),