Re: commons-vfs: github pull requests

Am Tue, 22 Mar 2016 16:33:12 + schrieb "Epstein, Ezra" : > Is commons-vfs being maintained? And is GitHub the up-to-date code > repo? Yes, github is a mirror of the apache git repo and the apache git repo mirrors the SVN based master. They should be in sync. The project has some activity, un

Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

+1 (non-binding) --Chris Nauroth On 3/21/16, 1:45 AM, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote: >Hi all, > >after long discussions I think we have gathered enough information to >decide whether we want to accept the Chimera project as a new Apache >Commons component. > >Proposed name: Apache Commons Crypto >

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0 based on RC1

Hi Emmanuel, Am 22.03.2016 um 21:22 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > Thank you very much pushing [configuration] forward Oliver. I haven't > looked at [configuration] for a long time, my needs are rather basic and > a mere read-only PropertiesConfiguration is good enough for me. There is > one change tho

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0 based on RC1

Thank you very much pushing [configuration] forward Oliver. I haven't looked at [configuration] for a long time, my needs are rather basic and a mere read-only PropertiesConfiguration is good enough for me. There is one change though I hoped could get into 2.0, that was the integration of DataConfi

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0 based on RC1

Le 20/03/2016 22:42, Oliver Heger a écrit : > Hi all, > > after a series of alpha and beta releases, I think we are now ready to > release the final 2.0 version of [configuration]. So this is the > corresponding release vote. > > Configuration 2.0 RC1 is available for review here: > https://d

Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

On 21.03.16 09:45, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > [X] +1 Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component > [ ] +0 OK, but... > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... > [ ] -1 I oppose this because... Bye, Thomas - To unsubscribe,

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0 based on RC1

Am 22.03.2016 um 01:32 schrieb James Carman: > +1 drop ant So we agree on this one. What about the actual vote? (Nudge, nudge) Oliver > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 5:06 PM Oliver Heger > wrote: > >> Hi Benedikt, >> >> Am 21.03.2016 um 09:58 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: >>> Hello Oliver, >>> >>> v

Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

Since we already started to use fractional numbers, I would be +0.5. I am also worried about the JNI stuff, but I think a new group of developers would be good for this community. Oliver Am 21.03.2016 um 09:45 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > Hi all, > > after long discussions I think we have gathere

Build failed in Jenkins: Commons-Compress #62

See Changes: [bodewig] COMPRESS-344 accept NUL as terminator for GNU extended names -- Started by an SCM change [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on mac-mini-1 (o

Build failed in Jenkins: Commons-Compress » Apache Commons Compress #62

See Changes: [bodewig] COMPRESS-344 accept NUL as terminator for GNU extended names -- Established TCP socket on 50433 maven3-agent.jar already up to date mave

Jenkins build is still unstable: commons-jcs #152

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Jenkins build is still unstable: commons-jcs » Apache Commons JCS :: Core #152

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

commons-vfs: github pull requests

Is commons-vfs being maintained? And is GitHub the up-to-date code repo? I notice a number of open pull requests, one from yours truly. https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pulls Just checking in to see if something more is needed for contributing to this project. --

Jenkins build is still unstable: commons-jcs #151

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Jenkins build is still unstable: commons-jcs » Apache Commons JCS :: Core #151

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [math] Staging site

On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 20:14:41 +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote: On 03/21/2016 07:32 PM, Evan Ward wrote: Hi, I'm on step 19 in Release.howto.txt, I've committed the updated site using svn, but I get a 404 when I try to view it at http://commons.staging.apache.org/proper/commons-math Any ideas what

Re: [collections] An order statistic tree

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Rodion Efremov < rodio...@cs.helsinki.fi.invalid> wrote: > Hello, all. > I would like to announce that I have a java.util.Set implementation that > is an order statistic tree (all non-bulk operations + select + rank in > O(log n) time) [1]. However, it seems like t

Re: commons-vfs:org.apache.commons.vfs2.provider.http.test.HttpProviderTestCase fails

Bernd Eckenfels schrieb am Di., 22. März 2016 um 08:47 Uhr: > Hello, > > I think for this test we can do fine with a (java mock) http server > started for the particular redirection test, other provider tests do that > as well. > > Added benefit would be, that we can actually assert some properti

Re: commons-vfs:org.apache.commons.vfs2.provider.http.test.HttpProviderTestCase fails

Hello, I think for this test we can do fine with a (java mock) http server started for the particular redirection test, other provider tests do that as well. Added benefit would be, that we can actually assert some properties of the request on server side. Gruss Bernd -- http://bernd.eckenfel

Re: commons-vfs: org.apache.commons.vfs2.provider.http.test.HttpProviderTestCase fails

Hi, Bernd Eckenfels schrieb am Di., 22. März 2016 um 01:03 Uhr: > Hello, > > I think it is a new problem. It is a bit unfortunate that those tests > rely on external web sites (and those seeem to no longer exist). > > If you want, you can file the report directly in the JIRA: > > https://issues.