On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:55:44 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 30/12/2015 06:18, Ole Ersoy a écrit :
Hi,
Hi Ole,
RealMatrixPreservingVisitor and RealMatrixChangingVisitor files look
identical with the exception of a single @see Default... annotation
(Which I think is redundant...same as > All
Not really "off-list". Sorry for the noise...
Gilles
On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 01:41:25 +0100, Gilles wrote:
HAPPY NEW YEAR!!
Ole
Thanks, Ole.
Best wishes to you too,
Gilles
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons
HAPPY NEW YEAR!!
Ole
Thanks, Ole.
Best wishes to you too,
Gilles
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
On 12/31/2015 05:42 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:54:00 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
On 12/31/2015 11:10 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 21:33:56 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hi,
In RealMatrixFormat.parse() MatrixUtils makes the decision on what
type of RealMatrix instance to return.
On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:54:00 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
On 12/31/2015 11:10 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 21:33:56 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hi,
In RealMatrixFormat.parse() MatrixUtils makes the decision on what
type of RealMatrix instance to return.
Ideally, this is correct as the actual
On 12/29/15 1:09 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 29/12/2015 20:48, Phil Steitz a écrit :
>>
>>> On Dec 29, 2015, at 11:39 AM, Luc Maisonobe
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> A few weeks ago, I proposed to release 3.6. There were two points I
>>> wanted to address before that, both related to ODE. T
Hi Rostislav,
Le 31/12/2015 13:43, Rostislav Krasny a écrit :
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> A few weeks ago, I proposed to release 3.6. There were two
>> points I wanted to address before that, both related to
>> ODE. These points are now completed: the
On 12/31/2015 11:10 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 21:33:56 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hi,
In RealMatrixFormat.parse() MatrixUtils makes the decision on what
type of RealMatrix instance to return.
Ideally, this is correct as the actual type is an "implementation detail".
Flexibility is
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 21:33:56 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hi,
In RealMatrixFormat.parse() MatrixUtils makes the decision on what
type of RealMatrix instance to return.
Ideally, this is correct as the actual type is an "implementation
detail".
Flexibility is gained if it
just returns double[][]
On 12/31/2015 03:33 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 31/12/2015 04:33, Ole Ersoy a écrit :
[...]
Of course, using this feature is rather expert use. Typically, it is
done when some algorithm creates the data array by itself, and then
wants to return it as a matrix, but will not use the array by
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A few weeks ago, I proposed to release 3.6. There were two
> points I wanted to address before that, both related to
> ODE. These points are now completed: the Adams methods
> stability issues have been fixed, and a bunch a field-
Le 31/12/2015 04:33, Ole Ersoy a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> In RealMatrixFormat.parse() MatrixUtils makes the decision on what type
> of RealMatrix instance to return. Flexibility is gained if it just
> returns double[][] letting the caller decide what type of RealMatrix
> instance to create. It's also b
12 matches
Mail list logo
