2014-10-19 6:18 GMT+02:00 Henri Yandell :
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Phil Steitz
> wrote:
>
> > On 10/18/14 2:03 PM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> > > You are not including duplicate artifacts, they are totally distinct.
> >
> > I think Romain's point is that classes that are not changed in the
All,
I have restored the original files but added deprecation and accuracy
warnings. The new interpolators are now in their own "Piecewise" surnamed
classes. All tests in the entire JUnit suite passed.
You can find the details of the pull request here:
https://github.com/apache/commons-math/pu
With [codec], I just tested a commons-parent 35-SNAPSHOT locally that has
the latest Apace POM 15 and all went well. Maven did not even download any
plugins for my particular set up/repo.
Gary
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Bernd Eckenfels
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> just because I took a look, I che
OK. If you want to put the "trivial modifications" that are required so
the code is "on par with what we had usually committed as new
contributions" in the JIRA incident, I can try to address them this week as
well.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Gilles
wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 19:33:25 +
Hello,
just because I took a look, I checked the diff:
commons-parent uses org.apache:apache:13 since rev1436511 (sebb)
(2013-01-01) and 15 is current. The diff is:
- shorter license name
- explicitely (informational) use prerequsites 2.2.1
- report output encoding property utf8 added
- default
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 19:33:25 +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 20/10/2014 16:00, Hank Grabowski a écrit :
I have some time this week to try to get these changes made to the
interpolators. I don't want to do anything without consensus
however. So
to try to incorporate the discussion above plus a
Le 20/10/2014 16:00, Hank Grabowski a écrit :
> I have some time this week to try to get these changes made to the
> interpolators. I don't want to do anything without consensus however. So
> to try to incorporate the discussion above plus a concerned raised over the
> weekend on the JIRA thread
Done!
2014-10-20 17:38 GMT+02:00 Thomas Neidhart :
> Thanks,
>
> I would close the ticket as "Not a problem", unless the OP can explain what
> it not clear from the existing javadoc.
>
> Thomas
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Benedikt Ritter
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Thomas,
> >
> > sorry, was a
Thanks,
I would close the ticket as "Not a problem", unless the OP can explain what
it not clear from the existing javadoc.
Thomas
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hello Thomas,
>
> sorry, was a bit premature to apply this patch. After giving this more
> thought, I agr
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Benedikt Ritter
wrote:
> 2014-10-20 16:31 GMT+02:00 Dan Tran :
>
> >
> >
> http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Maven-Parent-POM-24-Maven-Plugins-Parent-POM-25-Maven-Shared-Components-Parent-POM-20-M9-td5789803.html
> >
> >
> Not sure this is what Gary w
2014-10-20 16:31 GMT+02:00 Dan Tran :
>
> http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Maven-Parent-POM-24-Maven-Plugins-Parent-POM-25-Maven-Shared-Components-Parent-POM-20-M9-td5789803.html
>
>
Not sure this is what Gary was talking about. I think he was refering to
http://search.maven.org/#sear
Hello Thomas,
sorry, was a bit premature to apply this patch. After giving this more
thought, I agree with you. I have reverted the changes.
Thanks for catching that!
Benedikt
2014-10-19 14:26 GMT+02:00 Thomas Neidhart :
> On 10/19/2014 12:10 PM, brit...@apache.org wrote:
> > Author: britter
>
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Maven-Parent-POM-24-Maven-Plugins-Parent-POM-25-Maven-Shared-Components-Parent-POM-20-M9-td5789803.html
-D
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> 2014-10-20 15:31 GMT+02:00 Gary Gregory :
>
> > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:30 AM, Ben
2014-10-20 15:31 GMT+02:00 Gary Gregory :
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:30 AM, Benedikt Ritter
> wrote:
>
> > Yes, I think so. What are the changes compared to last apache parent?
> >
>
> I was hoping someone knew off the top of their head.
>
No sorry... there was not announcement. Where have you
I have some time this week to try to get these changes made to the
interpolators. I don't want to do anything without consensus however. So
to try to incorporate the discussion above plus a concerned raised over the
weekend on the JIRA thread I propose:
1. Adding the original functionality back
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:30 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Yes, I think so. What are the changes compared to last apache parent?
>
I was hoping someone knew off the top of their head.
Gary
>
> 2014-10-19 18:39 GMT+02:00 Gary Gregory :
>
> > Should commons-parent update the the latest Apache PO
Hi,
I can do the RM of course, but I wanted to give others the chance to jump
into email as I will not have much time for it anymore in the coming months.
Thomas
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> TN,
>
> Are you up for RM?
>
> Gary
>
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Gar
17 matches
Mail list logo
