Le 28/09/2014 02:36, sebb a écrit :
> -1 hashes are missing from the directory
The directory contains the PGP signatures, that's even better.
> Link to KEYS file is needed in the vote e-mail thread
As usual that's the KEYS file of the Apache Commons project, no need to
repeat it in every vote f
On 27 September 2014 08:50, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The third release candidate of BCEL is ready to pass under your scrutiny.
>
> Tag:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bcel/tags/BCEL_6_0_RC3/
> (r1627908)
>
> Release notes:
> http://people.apache.org/~ebourg/bcel/RELEAS
On 28 September 2014 01:22, sebb wrote:
> On 26 September 2014 22:12, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The second release candidate of BCEL is ready to pass under your scrutiny.
>>
>> Tag:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bcel/tags/BCEL_6_0_RC2/
>> (r1627879)
>>
>> Release
On 26 September 2014 22:12, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The second release candidate of BCEL is ready to pass under your scrutiny.
>
> Tag:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bcel/tags/BCEL_6_0_RC2/
> (r1627879)
>
> Release notes:
> http://people.apache.org/~ebourg/bcel/RELEA
2014-09-27 11:50 GMT+04:00 Emmanuel Bourg :
> Hi all,
>
> The third release candidate of BCEL is ready to pass under your scrutiny.
>
> Tag:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bcel/tags/BCEL_6_0_RC3/
> (r1627908)
>
> Release notes:
> http://people.apache.org/~ebourg/bcel/RELEASE-NOTES
Since IANAL, I'll abstain from opining, I think asking @legal would be the
safest bet; OTOH, rolling another RC keeps @legal out of the loop and is
simple.
I realize that rolling RC after RC is a pain and that our release process
is not friction free, but it's what we've got for now.
Gary
On Sat
Hi Gary,
can you confirm that a wrong copyright date is not a blocker for a
release? If so, I vote +1.
Oliver
Am 27.09.2014 um 21:27 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> I fixed the notice file in svn.
>
> Gary
>
> Original message From: Oliver Heger
> Date:09/27/2014 09:48 (GMT-05:00)
I fixed the notice file in svn.
Gary
Original message From: Oliver Heger
Date:09/27/2014 09:48 (GMT-05:00)
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release BCEL 6.0 based on RC3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Build works fine with Java 1.5 and 1.7 o
On 9/27/14 10:16 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> On Sep 27, 2014, at 6:46 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> It is not enough to set them volatile because the class has some invariants
>> that include more than one field.
> For example, under unlucky thread concurrency the method getIdleTimeMillis()
>
:-)
On Sep 27, 2014 12:33 PM, wrote:
> Author: djones
> Date: Sat Sep 27 17:33:00 2014
> New Revision: 1627984
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1627984
> Log:
> Removed redundant static modifier (thanks, Matt).
>
> Modified:
>
> commons/proper/lang/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/time
On Sep 27, 2014, at 6:46 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> It is not enough to set them volatile because the class has some invariants
> that include more than one field.
For example, under unlucky thread concurrency the method getIdleTimeMillis()
could return a negative value.
Jacopo
---
On 9/27/14 6:04 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> In org.apache.commons.pool2.impl.DefaultPooledObject.getActiveTimeMillis(),
> I see:
>
> // Take copies to avoid threading issues
> long rTime = lastReturnTime;
> long bTime = lastBorrowTime;
>
> But isn't is the case that the object
Note that enums are always static and that this keyword is redundant when
used in their declaration.
Matt
On Sep 27, 2014 10:03 AM, wrote:
> Author: djones
> Date: Sat Sep 27 15:03:26 2014
> New Revision: 1627974
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1627974
> Log:
> Replaced private integer constants
yes, sure. Should I create a new ticket?
Jacopo
On Sep 27, 2014, at 6:46 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi and thanks for chiming in.
>
> The best path is to use Jira so we can all look and discuss.
>
> Gary
>
> Original message
> From: Jacopo Cappellato
> Date:09/27/2014 12:36
Hi and thanks for chiming in.
The best path is to use Jira so we can all look and discuss.
Gary
Original message
From: Jacopo Cappellato
Date:09/27/2014 12:36 (GMT-05:00)
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [pool] time to cut 2.3
Hi Gary, all,
I am sorry if I jump in in
Hi Gary, all,
I am sorry if I jump in in this conversation: I am a committer of another ASF
project (I am actually the PMC chairman for Apache OFBiz) and my project is
using dbcp2/pool2, so thank you for all the work you did and are doing.
I am reviewing the code in DefaultPooledObject and Gary
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2014-09-27, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > What is the status of this VOTE?
>
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/commons-dev/201409.mbox/%3C541FF178.1030204%40apache.org%3E
>
Thanks!
Gary
>
> Stefan
>
> -
I do understand that!
As long as it is on your radar with a landing site in mind, we are good ;-)
Gary
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2014-09-27, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > Still closing in on 1.9 ;-)
>
> > Stefan, are you ready to cut a released?
>
> Distracted by
On 2014-09-27, Gary Gregory wrote:
> What is the status of this VOTE?
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/commons-dev/201409.mbox/%3C541FF178.1030204%40apache.org%3E
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons
On 2014-09-27, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Still closing in on 1.9 ;-)
> Stefan, are you ready to cut a released?
Distracted by real life, might get around to it tomorrow, but it is
quite possible I'll have to push it off to the next weekend.
Stefan
--
Le 27/09/2014 15:48, Oliver Heger a écrit :
> - The distribution files of other Commons components start with the
> commons- prefix. This is not the case here.
Because BCEL wasn't a Commons project and still distributed under it's
own org.apache.bcel groupId
> I am not sure how problematic the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Build works fine with Java 1.5 and 1.7 on Windows 8.1. Artifacts look
good. The site shows that the code base probably needs some work to
improve quality, but this does not block the release.
Nits:
- - The NOTICE file states the wrong copyright year.
Still closing in on 1.9 ;-)
Stefan, are you ready to cut a released?
Gary
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 9:04 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 31 August 2014 20:28, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > it's only four issues we've closed since the 1.8.1 release but I
> > consider COMPRESS-286 pretty serious
In org.apache.commons.pool2.impl.DefaultPooledObject.getActiveTimeMillis(),
I see:
// Take copies to avoid threading issues
long rTime = lastReturnTime;
long bTime = lastBorrowTime;
But isn't is the case that the object could be returned and borrowed again
between the two
What is the status of this VOTE?
Gary
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 21/09/2014 03:31, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > How should reviewers test this RC?
>
> That is up to the reviewer. My suggestion would be:
>
> The same way they tested the unsigned released when that was ma
Hi all,
The third release candidate of BCEL is ready to pass under your scrutiny.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bcel/tags/BCEL_6_0_RC3/
(r1627908)
Release notes:
http://people.apache.org/~ebourg/bcel/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
Distribution files:
http://people.apache.org/~ebourg/bc
26 matches
Mail list logo
