Hi Gary, can you confirm that a wrong copyright date is not a blocker for a release? If so, I vote +1.
Oliver Am 27.09.2014 um 21:27 schrieb Gary Gregory: > I fixed the notice file in svn. > > Gary > > <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Oliver Heger > <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de> </div><div>Date:09/27/2014 09:48 (GMT-05:00) > </div><div>To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> > </div><div>Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release BCEL 6.0 based on RC3 </div><div> > </div>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Build works fine with Java 1.5 and 1.7 on Windows 8.1. Artifacts look > good. The site shows that the code base probably needs some work to > improve quality, but this does not block the release. > > Nits: > - - The NOTICE file states the wrong copyright year. > - - The distribution files of other Commons components start with the > commons- prefix. This is not the case here. > > I am not sure how problematic the wrong copyright year is, also from a > legal PoV. This prevents me from voting +1; everything else is not > blocking. > > Oliver > > Am 27.09.2014 um 09:50 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: >> Hi all, >> >> The third release candidate of BCEL is ready to pass under your >> scrutiny. >> >> Tag: >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bcel/tags/BCEL_6_0_RC3/ >> >> > (r1627908) >> >> Release notes: >> http://people.apache.org/~ebourg/bcel/RELEASE-NOTES.txt >> >> Distribution files: http://people.apache.org/~ebourg/bcel/ >> >> Checksums (sha1): 6f1d11224b7cea98ffbffa25d69d759fcd47421c >> bcel-6.0-bin.tar.gz 425729b886f72481bdbfc7e8ca108f20c00e67ef >> bcel-6.0-bin.zip 89e171be63df397d23ea746f9845cf3087e8467e >> bcel-6.0-src.tar.gz a03c2e605b8eb997b5d023d6a7d6aa54fbf3600e >> bcel-6.0-src.zip >> >> Site: http://people.apache.org/~ebourg/bcel/site/ >> >> Javadoc: http://people.apache.org/~ebourg/bcel/site/apidocs/ >> >> Maven artifacts: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1047/org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.0/ >> >> >> >> Please review the release candidate and vote. This vote will close >> no sooner that 72 hours from now. >> >> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts [ ] +0 OK, but... [ ] -0 OK, but >> really should fix... [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... >> >> Thank you for your reviews, >> >> Emmanuel Bourg >> >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUJsAyAAoJEDgk3dGBGEE4j18IALlBJsgK9Kf0APSQdst8Idui > 65zuBrApxqy/dpxT51m8egk8zWasG+PIu686jAjcs9Hwj23STtHKX0DXKnQVCw6Q > mrsnnxHZZ4BHRFp8PUeu6kKz+KuTOVmJmoHBg+DusbHkxCD07bIFxHx81v200tbG > UHOSE/+tdSo7urOC98YTMZ1Ikg+zonRG2GTE1PWgNXsS+E/wM/U0y3MFkEEUginV > FGWscZgflUcBJkME9J5trvDM14khFQi6OmpZKNk4Ld54N6NmoM15Tq4nsDWSKhNX > 050R4Cg1W2onmZLlBy/Vox3owTvM9B+jh3hn7CmlNpSVH88dG3A+FcB6QFSXGf4= > =lDGf > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
