On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 8:59 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 19 February 2014 02:45, Matt Benson wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 8:25 PM, sebb wrote:
> >>
> >> On 19 February 2014 02:10, Matt Benson wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 7:28 PM, sebb wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On 19 February 2014 00:29,
On 19 February 2014 02:45, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 8:25 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 19 February 2014 02:10, Matt Benson wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 7:28 PM, sebb wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 19 February 2014 00:29, Matt Benson wrote:
>> >> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:42 PM,
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 8:25 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 19 February 2014 02:10, Matt Benson wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 7:28 PM, sebb wrote:
> >>
> >> On 19 February 2014 00:29, Matt Benson wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:42 PM, sebb wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On 14 February 2014 00:35,
There is a temporary problem with JIRA.
It looks as though it has not created the issue, but in fact it has
created the issue, and failed to close the creation dialog.
So please don't click submit any more ...
Thanks!
bcc: to Jira creator
On 19 February 2014 02:19, Jungtaek Lim (JIRA) wrote:
On 19 February 2014 02:10, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 7:28 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 19 February 2014 00:29, Matt Benson wrote:
>> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:42 PM, sebb wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 14 February 2014 00:35, Matt Benson wrote:
>> >> > Seb, can you verify whether you c
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 8:04 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 19 February 2014 01:28, Matt Benson wrote:
> > That wasn't supposed to be a Maven property, but a local property. The
> use
> > of the task above establishes a scoped property that will shadow
> > any preexisting value of the property "parent",
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 7:28 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 19 February 2014 00:29, Matt Benson wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:42 PM, sebb wrote:
> >>
> >> On 14 February 2014 00:35, Matt Benson wrote:
> >> > Seb, can you verify whether you can do `mvn install` from a fresh
> >> > checkout?
> >> >
On 19 February 2014 01:28, Matt Benson wrote:
> That wasn't supposed to be a Maven property, but a local property. The use
> of the task above establishes a scoped property that will shadow
> any preexisting value of the property "parent", but I can choose a
> different name to avoid this confusi
On 19 February 2014 00:29, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:42 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 14 February 2014 00:35, Matt Benson wrote:
>> > Seb, can you verify whether you can do `mvn install` from a fresh
>> > checkout?
>> > This is AFAIK typically required with multimodule Maven proj
That wasn't supposed to be a Maven property, but a local property. The use
of the task above establishes a scoped property that will shadow
any preexisting value of the property "parent", but I can choose a
different name to avoid this confusion. Thanks for getting involved.
Matt
On Tue, Feb 18
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:42 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 14 February 2014 00:35, Matt Benson wrote:
> > Seb, can you verify whether you can do `mvn install` from a fresh
> checkout?
> > This is AFAIK typically required with multimodule Maven projects: as one
> > module is built, it is installed so that
Very nice ! Thanks a lot.
What about adding a 'Follow us on Twitter' on the home page?
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 18/02/2014 18:51, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I've just published our website. The new skin is now online. [1]
> Since site publication takes a long time with my internet connec
On 02/18/2014 09:51 AM, luc wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As you have probably noticed, I have committed the changes proposed by
> Evan. This ends up to about 20 different commits,
> as I have tried to stick with the progressive changes he made in his
> Github repository. Some of the initial commits
> do n
Both Maven and ant builds run fine under Windows 8.1 with Java 1.7.
Sites and artifacts look good.
I agree with sebb that the errors in the clirr report should be
mentioned in the release notes. Otherwise, I found no problems.
Oliver
Am 17.02.2014 21:42, schrieb Mark Thomas:
> 2.2 fixes a few bu
On 2/18/14, 10:51 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 18/02/2014 18:24, sebb wrote:
>> On 17 February 2014 20:42, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> 2.2 fixes a few bugs and adds a new testOnCreate() feature that is
>>> required by DBCP 2.
>>>
>>>
>>> The Pool 2.2 RC1 is available for review here:
>>> https://dist.
On 18 February 2014 18:51, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 18/02/2014 18:24, sebb wrote:
>> On 17 February 2014 20:42, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> 2.2 fixes a few bugs and adds a new testOnCreate() feature that is
>>> required by DBCP 2.
>>>
>>>
>>> The Pool 2.2 RC1 is available for review here:
>>> https:/
On 18/02/2014 18:24, sebb wrote:
> On 17 February 2014 20:42, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> 2.2 fixes a few bugs and adds a new testOnCreate() feature that is
>> required by DBCP 2.
>>
>>
>> The Pool 2.2 RC1 is available for review here:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/pool/ (r4424)
>
On 17 February 2014 20:42, Mark Thomas wrote:
> 2.2 fixes a few bugs and adds a new testOnCreate() feature that is
> required by DBCP 2.
>
>
> The Pool 2.2 RC1 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/pool/ (r4424)
Sigs and hashes OK.
Source archive agrees
2014-02-18 17:10 GMT+01:00 Duncan Jones :
> On 18 February 2014 15:58, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> > 2014-02-18 16:28 GMT+01:00 Duncan Jones :
> >
> >> On 15 February 2014 10:35, wrote:
> >> > Author: britter
> >> > Date: Sat Feb 15 10:35:35 2014
> >> > New Revision: 1568612
> >> >
> >> > URL: htt
Looking great! Kudos!!!
Bruno
>
> From: Adrian Crum
>To: Commons Developers List
>Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 2:58 PM
>Subject: Re: [SITE] New design is finally online
>
>
>The site looks great! Thanks Benedikt!
>
>Adrian Crum
>Sandglass Software
>www.sand
Well done.
I pushed BCEL last site but I do not see it.
Gary
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've just published our website. The new skin is now online. [1]
> Since site publication takes a long time with my internet connection, I'll
> only publish a few
2014-02-18 19:01 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory :
> Well done.
>
> I pushed BCEL last site but I do not see it.
>
Maybe it need some time to sync? Don't know...
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Benedikt Ritter >wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've just published our website. The new skin
The site looks great! Thanks Benedikt!
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 2/18/2014 9:51 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Hi all,
I've just published our website. The new skin is now online. [1]
Since site publication takes a long time with my internet connection, I'll
only
Hi all,
I've just published our website. The new skin is now online. [1]
Since site publication takes a long time with my internet connection, I'll
only publish a few components every day. Help is welcome here :-)
Benedikt
[1] http://commons.apache.org
--
http://people.apache.org/~britter/
ht
Hi Sebb,
thanks for taking care!
Benedikt
2014-02-18 18:31 GMT+01:00 sebb :
> The Maven project have just announced that Maven 2 is EOL and is not
> supported any longer.
>
> I have therefore updated Continuum to use Maven 3.0.5 for all builds.
>
> There were some project builds that were the
Hi Mark,
I won't have the time before wednesday evening (CET) before I can review a
RC.
Benedikt
2014-02-18 18:37 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
> On 18/02/2014 17:27, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> >
> >> On 18/02/2014 16:33, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >>>
On 18/02/2014 17:27, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 18/02/2014 16:33, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:09 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>
On 18/02/2014 05:01, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Since you'll reroll the RC to fix the rele
The Maven project have just announced that Maven 2 is EOL and is not
supported any longer.
I have therefore updated Continuum to use Maven 3.0.5 for all builds.
There were some project builds that were the same as the shared group
build (Java 1.6 with Maven 3) so I deleted those builds..
Hopeful
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 18/02/2014 16:33, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:09 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> >
> >> On 18/02/2014 05:01, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >>> Since you'll reroll the RC to fix the release notes for the version,
> you
> >>> might h
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=28152&projectId=74
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Tue 18 Feb 2014 17:21:58 +
Finished at: Tue 18 Feb 2014 17:22:16 +
Total time: 18s
Build Trigger: Schedule
B
FYI: Infra has fixed the issue.
2014-02-15 12:07 GMT+01:00 Benedikt Ritter :
> builds@ told me to get in touch with infra. I've created INFRA-7322 [2].
>
> Benedikt
>
> [1]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-builds/201402.mbox/%3ccab917rj-1grxaj6k0py7x3ogsgvhpqjqewxg16tfmaidn+9...@ma
On 18/02/2014 16:35, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:19 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 18/02/2014 05:26, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> Problem with the site: on the main page under "Migrating from Pool 2.0",
>>> the current version described is 2.1, not 2.2.
>>>
>>> I would rename this
On 18/02/2014 16:33, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:09 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 18/02/2014 05:01, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> Since you'll reroll the RC to fix the release notes for the version, you
>>> might has well update to commons-parent 33 to pick up the new skin.
>>
>> W
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:19 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 18/02/2014 05:26, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Problem with the site: on the main page under "Migrating from Pool 2.0",
> > the current version described is 2.1, not 2.2.
> >
> > I would rename this section "Migrating to Pool 2.1 from 2.0" and a
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:09 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 18/02/2014 05:01, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Since you'll reroll the RC to fix the release notes for the version, you
> > might has well update to commons-parent 33 to pick up the new skin.
>
> Why do I need to reroll the RC to fix the release
On 18 February 2014 15:58, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> 2014-02-18 16:28 GMT+01:00 Duncan Jones :
>
>> On 15 February 2014 10:35, wrote:
>> > Author: britter
>> > Date: Sat Feb 15 10:35:35 2014
>> > New Revision: 1568612
>> >
>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1568612
>> > Log:
>> > LANG-977: NumericE
2014-02-18 16:28 GMT+01:00 Duncan Jones :
> On 15 February 2014 10:35, wrote:
> > Author: britter
> > Date: Sat Feb 15 10:35:35 2014
> > New Revision: 1568612
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1568612
> > Log:
> > LANG-977: NumericEntityEscaper incorrectly encodes supplementary
> characters. T
On 15 February 2014 10:35, wrote:
> Author: britter
> Date: Sat Feb 15 10:35:35 2014
> New Revision: 1568612
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1568612
> Log:
> LANG-977: NumericEntityEscaper incorrectly encodes supplementary characters.
> Thanks to Chris Karcher.
Chris isn't listed as a contribu
Hi all,
As you have probably noticed, I have committed the changes proposed by
Evan. This ends up to about 20 different commits,
as I have tried to stick with the progressive changes he made in his
Github repository. Some of the initial commits
do not abide by our development rules (missing Apa
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:40:57 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 2/17/14, 9:57 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 17/02/2014 16:15, Ted Dunning a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 5:01 AM, Emmanuel Joliet
wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-870
" Recently, many problems have been found out wi
On 18/02/2014 05:26, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Problem with the site: on the main page under "Migrating from Pool 2.0",
> the current version described is 2.1, not 2.2.
>
> I would rename this section "Migrating to Pool 2.1 from 2.0" and add a new
> section "Migrating to Pool 2.2 from 2.1". The "Migra
On 18/02/2014 05:01, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Since you'll reroll the RC to fix the release notes for the version, you
> might has well update to commons-parent 33 to pick up the new skin.
Why do I need to reroll the RC to fix the release notes? The only issue
you identified was I hadn't replaced the
42 matches
Mail list logo
