On 2014-01-12, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> I'm a bit torn on this and since I'll re-roll a new RC anyway I'd like
> to see what others think about hiding internal packages.
I've unhid it again and strengthened the "may change" warning as Sebb
suggested. Making things explicit feels better to me.
St
On 01/12/2014 06:46 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 1/12/14, 6:03 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> we had some preliminary discussion about changing the
>> BinominalConfidenceInterval class in MATH-1086.
>>
>> Right now the class provides some non-static methods to create various
>> ConfidenceIn
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:45 PM, sebb wrote:
> What does the Javadoc say?
>
The Javadoc describes the current behavior, which is whacky IMO. This could
be a case where the docs documents the code, even though it does not make
sense.
It sounds dangerous to change it in a minor release.
Gary
Splitting with an empty string doesn't make any sense to me. Nothing should
match that -- even an empty string. It's a lack of a token.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> ping, any thought on this?
>
>
> 2014/1/11 Benedikt Ritter
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > while looking through t
What does the Javadoc say?
On 13 January 2014 17:00, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> ping, any thought on this?
>
>
> 2014/1/11 Benedikt Ritter
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> while looking through the open issues for lang, I came across LANG-823:
>> StringUtils.split should handle empty strings the same as other conte
On 13 January 2014 11:08, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 12/01/2014 23:10, sebb wrote:
>
>>> Removing the 1.4.x build should help too.
>>
>> If only.
>>
>> It's marginally better now, as the branch temporarily shows up as
>> Apache Commons DBCP 1.5-SNAPSHOT in the Group summary, but click on
>> the proje
ping, any thought on this?
2014/1/11 Benedikt Ritter
> Hi,
>
> while looking through the open issues for lang, I came across LANG-823:
> StringUtils.split should handle empty strings the same as other content
> [1]. The request makes sense to me - the empty string should be handled
> like any o
On 12/01/2014 23:10, sebb wrote:
>> Removing the 1.4.x build should help too.
>
> If only.
>
> It's marginally better now, as the branch temporarily shows up as
> Apache Commons DBCP 1.5-SNAPSHOT in the Group summary, but click on
> the project and it all reverts to 1.4 and the old branch. I've
I'm not a developer of [dbcp]. It was just something I saw, while looking
though the e-mails :-)
I mean, I could do it, but I don't want to mess with stuff I don't know
good enough
Benedikt
2014/1/12 Gary Gregory
> Go for it!
>
> G
>
> Original message
> From: Benedikt Ritter
