On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 11:08 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 3 January 2014 15:04, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Jörg Schaible
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Gary,
> >>
> >> I tried to build from source with my compiler zoo. I cannot test Java
> 1.3
> >> compatibility, because the lack of
On 12/28/2013 06:35 PM, Gilles wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I've just attached the proposed implementation:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-923
>
> It is part of a new package "o.a.c.m.ml.neuralnet" that is supposed
> to contain tools for creating artificial neural networks; however
> the code
On 3 January 2014 15:04, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>
>> Hi Gary,
>>
>> I tried to build from source with my compiler zoo. I cannot test Java 1.3
>> compatibility, because the lack of such an environment on my side.
>>
>> Java 1.4:
>>
>> It is not p
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> I tried to build from source with my compiler zoo. I cannot test Java 1.3
> compatibility, because the lack of such an environment on my side.
>
> Java 1.4:
>
> It is not possible to build with Maven 2.0.x, since the assembly-plu
But the site is versioned, in SVN and as a reflection of the SVN/release of the
code base.
G
Original message
From: Benedikt Ritter
Date:01/03/2014 08:12 (GMT-05:00)
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [LANG] Snap-shot version in website header
2014/1/3 Henri Yand
On 3 January 2014 13:12, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> 2014/1/3 Henri Yandell
>
>> Yes we change the site between releases.
>>
>> The bigger question is why we have a version number on the website, it
>> isn't versioned.
>>
>
> Well at least the repots have kind of a version, because they reflect the
2014/1/3 Henri Yandell
> Yes we change the site between releases.
>
> The bigger question is why we have a version number on the website, it
> isn't versioned.
>
Well at least the repots have kind of a version, because they reflect the
state of the code they were build against.
And to me the rep
Hi Gary,
I tried to build from source with my compiler zoo. I cannot test Java 1.3
compatibility, because the lack of such an environment on my side.
Java 1.4:
It is not possible to build with Maven 2.0.x, since the assembly-plugin
already requires Maven 2.2.1 (there might be more plugins) and
Hello Hen
2014/1/3 Henri Yandell
> Better move quick on 3.2.1. Only bit I don't like about that is that it
> implies we shouldn't be committing anything that would lead us to want to
> have a 3.3.
I'm working on getting 3.2.1 RC1 out of the door this weekend.
>
> I'm +1 for calendar defined
