Re: [functor] Keep Serializable in [functor] or drop it?

2013-10-30 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Makes sense for me t dro serialization support for 1.0. If users really demand it, it can be added afterwards. Benedikt 2013/10/31 Bruno P. Kinoshita > Hi all, > > I posted it in the mailing list some time ago and now I will have time to > work on this during the next days. I've flled FUNCTOR-2

Re: [functor] Keep Serializable in [functor] or drop it?

2013-10-30 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
Hi all,  I posted it in the mailing list some time ago and now I will have time to work on this during the next days. I've flled FUNCTOR-29 to work on this. Let me know if there are any objections to this. Thanks! [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FUNCTOR-29   Bruno P. Kinoshita http:/

Re: svn commit: r1537111 - /commons/proper/dbcp/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/dbcp2/BasicDataSource.java

2013-10-30 Thread sebb
On 30 October 2013 14:38, wrote: > Author: markt > Date: Wed Oct 30 14:38:54 2013 > New Revision: 1537111 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1537111 > Log: > Use generics. Structure code so explicit @SuppressWarnings annotations can be > used rather than adding one that covers the entire method. >

Re: [imaging] Closing stream

2013-10-30 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Damjan, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > For the sake of similarity of 1.0 with 0.x versions, I've stayed with Java > 1.5 and in commit 1537238 I've gone with the set flag on every successful > return path + closeQuietly() idea. Looks good now. Thanks for your effort. > It was a mission and broke t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Pool 2.0 RC1 as 2.0

2013-10-30 Thread sebb
On 30 October 2013 19:31, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 30/10/2013 17:52, Mark Thomas wrote: > > > >> Please review the release candidate and vote. >> This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now >> >> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts >> [ ] +0 OK, but... >> [ ] -0 OK, but really shoul

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Pool 2.0 RC1 as 2.0

2013-10-30 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello Mark, Builds fine with: Apache Maven 3.1.1 (0728685237757ffbf44136acec0402957f723d9a; 2013-09-17 17:22:22+0200) Maven home: /Applications/dev/maven/apache-maven-3.1.1 Java version: 1.7.0_40, vendor: Oracle Corporation Java home: /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_40.jdk/Contents/Hom

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Pool 2.0 RC1 as 2.0

2013-10-30 Thread Mark Thomas
On 30/10/2013 17:52, Mark Thomas wrote: > Please review the release candidate and vote. > This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now > > [ ] +1 Release these artifacts > [ ] +0 OK, but... > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... > [X] -1 I oppose this release because... I'v

Re: [imaging] Closing stream

2013-10-30 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Sounds good to me. 2013/10/30 Damjan Jovanovic > For the sake of similarity of 1.0 with 0.x versions, I've stayed with Java > 1.5 and in commit 1537238 I've gone with the set flag on every successful > return path + closeQuietly() idea. > > It was a mission and broke things (DeflaterOutputStrea

Re: [imaging] Closing stream

2013-10-30 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
For the sake of similarity of 1.0 with 0.x versions, I've stayed with Java 1.5 and in commit 1537238 I've gone with the set flag on every successful return path + closeQuietly() idea. It was a mission and broke things (DeflaterOutputStream apparently doesn't honor flush()). I am moving Imaging to

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons Pool 2.0 RC1 as 2.0

2013-10-30 Thread Mark Thomas
Development on Pool 2 is complete and a review of the remaining DBCP bugs has not highlighted any that are likely to trigger significant API changes in Pool so it is time for a release. The Pool 2.0 RC1 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/pool/ (r3380)

[POOL] Attempting an RC

2013-10-30 Thread Mark Thomas
I think POOL 2 is ready for a release so I plan to start that process today. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [Math] Deprecate "pow(int, long)" and "pow(long,long)" in "ArithmeticUtils"

2013-10-30 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 29/10/2013 23:04, Gilles a écrit : > On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:14:19 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> Le 29/10/2013 15:00, Gilles a écrit : >>> Hello. >> >> Hi Gilles, >> >>> >>> While working on MATH-1047, I wondered about the usefulness of those >>> two methods. Excluding the trivial case (base=|1|