So, it seems like putting the method in the FileProvider interface is
the right place for it?!
~Roger
-Original Message-
From: Bernd Eckenfels [mailto:e...@zusammenkunft.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 3:53 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [VFS] Support for File System Ro
Am 28.08.2013, 00:36 Uhr, schrieb Roger L. Whitcomb
:
The reason I think this is necessary is that, in order to do browsing of
all the files in a system, you need to be able to get to all the
relevant top-level locations. And for Samba (for a non-obvious
example), there typically will be multip
I'm still interested in this. I can see the idea of multiple roots
being useful in an SMB file system, or local (Windows) file systems. Of
course, for others there would only be a single "root" (namely "/").
I'm writing a custom provider which could be pointing to either Linux or
Windows. Would
A friend of mine at $work has used one class with no problems, FWIW.
Thanks,
Matt
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Thomas Neidhart
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> its now quite a while since we released 4.0-alpha1 but unfortunately we
> did not receive any feedback so far (neither have been any issues
> repor
Default Maven 2 Build Definition (1.5)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Continuum-Build-Host: vmbuild
X-Continuum-Project-Id: 286
X-Continuum-Project-Name: Commons JCS
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/build
Default Maven 2 Build Definition (1.5)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Continuum-Build-Host: vmbuild
X-Continuum-Project-Id: 286
X-Continuum-Project-Name: Commons JCS
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/build
Hi Ajo,
Le 27/08/2013 16:44, Ajo Fod a écrit :
> Thanks for the constant structure.
>
> No. The limit value when x->0+ is 1, not O.
>
> I agree with this. I was just going for the derivatives = 0.
>
>
>> The nth derivative of a^x can be computed analytically as ln(a)^n a^x,
>> so the initial s
Hi,
its now quite a while since we released 4.0-alpha1 but unfortunately we
did not receive any feedback so far (neither have been any issues reported).
So, if somebody already used it (successful or not), please share your
impressions / experiences.
Thanks,
Thomas
On 25 August 2013 16:22, wrote:
> Author: tv
> Date: Sun Aug 25 15:22:17 2013
> New Revision: 1517307
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1517307
> Log:
> Update commons-parent POM to version 30
Why not update to CP32?
> Modified:
> commons/proper/jcs/trunk/pom.xml
>
> Modified: commons/proper/
Am 27.08.2013 15:57, schrieb Phil Steitz:
> On 8/27/13 6:31 AM, James Carman wrote:
>> It was mentioned the other day, so I thought I would propose a formal
>> discussion. Is it time to let [math] "leave the nest"? I would doubt
>> there are very many of us qualified to work on such a library her
On 08/27/2013 12:35 PM, Konstantin Berlin wrote:
> Sorry, I think there was a misunderstanding. I was suggesting, like
> you are pointing out, that you make a newton step function explicit
> inside the optimizer. I think it is a good idea that this function is
> explicit in all optimizers, so it c
Using https://github.com/apache/commons-math/pull/2.diff and `patch -p1
< 2.diff` worked for me. (On top of svn r1517789)
I've also attached the modified files to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1026
Regards,
Evan
On Tue 27 Aug 2013 12:35:48 PM EDT, Gilles wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Aug 20
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 08:40:25 -0700, Ted Dunning wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Gilles
wrote:
The patch does not apply cleanly (special options needed to handle
output from git?).
Try different prefix levels. The -p0 option is commonly helpful.
I did that too. It didn't work.
Gi
Sorry, I think there was a misunderstanding. I was suggesting, like
you are pointing out, that you make a newton step function explicit
inside the optimizer. I think it is a good idea that this function is
explicit in all optimizers, so it can later be overwritten.At the
least, it should be propaga
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Gilles wrote:
> The patch does not apply cleanly (special options needed to handle
> output from git?).
>
Try different prefix levels. The -p0 option is commonly helpful.
Thanks for the constant structure.
No. The limit value when x->0+ is 1, not O.
I agree with this. I was just going for the derivatives = 0.
> The nth derivative of a^x can be computed analytically as ln(a)^n a^x,
> so the initial slope at x=0 is simply ln(a), positive for a > 1, zero
> for a =
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:19:58 + (UTC), wardev wrote:
GitHub user wardev opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-math/pull/2
Two implementations of least squares in separeate packages.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pul
GitHub user wardev opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-math/pull/2
Two implementations of least squares in separeate packages.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/wardev/commons-math merged
Alter
On 08/27/2013 08:44 AM, Evan Ward wrote:
> On 08/27/2013 07:27 AM, Gilles wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Sorry but the _main_ question of my previous post was...
>>
>> On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 16:35:51 -0400, Evan Ward wrote:
>>> On 08/26/2013 03:33 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 13:59:32 -0400, Evan
On 8/27/13 6:31 AM, James Carman wrote:
> It was mentioned the other day, so I thought I would propose a formal
> discussion. Is it time to let [math] "leave the nest"? I would doubt
> there are very many of us qualified to work on such a library here in
> Commons. I have a degree in Mathematics
Hi All:
I'm only a casual [math] user (we use [math] at work for some *very* simple
things), but I hope that we, the wider [commons] community, has been
beneficial in sharing expertise in Java, design, and other non-mathematics
but programming related issues. That whole thread about exceptions a w
It was mentioned the other day, so I thought I would propose a formal
discussion. Is it time to let [math] "leave the nest"? I would doubt
there are very many of us qualified to work on such a library here in
Commons. I have a degree in Mathematics, but I haven't used the
advanced math in such a
On 08/26/2013 03:11 PM, Konstantin Berlin wrote:
> I looked only at the GuassNewton class as a general guide to how
> things work. I like it a lot! I only wish all of the optimizations
> were rewritten in this way.
>
> Several comments
>
> 1) I believe this code can now be simplified
>
> // build
On 08/27/2013 07:27 AM, Gilles wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Sorry but the _main_ question of my previous post was...
>
> On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 16:35:51 -0400, Evan Ward wrote:
>> On 08/26/2013 03:33 PM, Gilles wrote:
>>> On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 13:59:32 -0400, Evan Ward wrote:
Hi again,
I rearranged
I can imagine it in CollectionUtils if it's generified.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 8/26/13 4:37 AM, Gilles wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 Aug 2013 17:14:37 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 8/25/13 9:59 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Sun, 25 Aug 2013 09:19:41 -0700, Phil Steitz wrot
Le 26/08/2013 22:37, Ajo Fod a écrit :
> On a side note. Given a derivative structure ds. Wouldn't it be nice to
> generate a constant derivative structure with something like:
>
> ds.getConstant(dobule value);
> Currently I"m doing something like:
> new DerivativeStructure(length, order, value);
Le 26/08/2013 17:23, Ajo Fod a écrit :
> With regards to what is happening in DsCompiler.pow():
> IMHO, when a==0 and x>=0 the function is well behaved because log|a| -> Inf
> slower than a^x -> 0. I got to this by simulation.
> One could probably get to something more conclusive using L'Hopital ru
Hi.
Sorry but the _main_ question of my previous post was...
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 16:35:51 -0400, Evan Ward wrote:
On 08/26/2013 03:33 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 13:59:32 -0400, Evan Ward wrote:
Hi again,
I rearranged the least squares package and I've posted the
results.[1]
I've
Am 27.08.2013 07:06, schrieb Phil Steitz:
> On 8/26/13 11:28 AM, Oliver Heger wrote:
>> Am 26.08.2013 16:18, schrieb Phil Steitz:
>>>
>>> On Aug 26, 2013, at 7:38 PM, Oliver Heger
>>> wrote:
>>>
Am 25.08.2013 18:45, schrieb Adrian Crum:
> +1
>
> -Adrian
>
> On 8/25/2013 9
29 matches
Mail list logo
