Hi Seb,
> So long as the $Date$ ones are removed, I don't think it matters
> whether the others use Revision or Id.
thanks for the feedback! since in the code on /trunk there is a mixed
use of both $Id$ and $Revision$, would it worth have a uniformed way?
TIA,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~si
Phil,
Will do. Thanks for clarifying.
Jared
From: Phil Steitz [phil.ste...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 11:48 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [Math] NOTICE file
On 7/18/12 9:35 PM, Becksfort, Jared wrote:
> My employer requires t
On 7/18/12 9:35 PM, Becksfort, Jared wrote:
> My employer requires that we retain copyright.
OK, that requires a patch to the (single) NOTICE.txt file in the
project root.
> The code will also be released in other packages at some point.
That does not require any special notice. It is allowed
My employer requires that we retain copyright. The code will also be released
in other packages at some point. If neither of those requires that I modify
the NOTICE file, then I won't bother.
Jared
From: Phil Steitz [phil.ste...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesd
On 7/18/12 9:02 PM, Becksfort, Jared wrote:
> That may have been a dumb question. I was thinking there were multiple
> NOTICE files, but apparently there is only one. I guess it can be part of
> the patch unless I hear otherwise from someone on the list.
In general, there is no need to update
That may have been a dumb question. I was thinking there were multiple NOTICE
files, but apparently there is only one. I guess it can be part of the patch
unless I hear otherwise from someone on the list.
Jared
From: Becksfort, Jared [jared.becksf...@st
Hello,
I am ready to submit code patches for a few tickets. I will email the patches
to JIRA. They include unit tests. Do I just email the NOTICE file also, or do
I have to include it in the patch file somehow?
Thanks,
Jared
Email Disclaimer: www.stjude.org/emaildisclaimer
Consultation Dis
On 18 July 2012 21:35, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we discussed already a lot on this for other components, anyway it
> would be better discussing it before modifying the code:
>
> * is it OK to drop @author tags? original authors, committers and
> contributors are already mentioned in the
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> another question: since chain2 breaks all kind of backward
> compatibility with previous version... does it really makes sense
> keeping the @since tag?
>
It's ok to keep them IMO.
Gary
>
> TIA!
>
> -Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~si
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we discussed already a lot on this for other components, anyway it
> would be better discussing it before modifying the code:
>
> * is it OK to drop @author tags? original authors, committers and
> contributors are already mentio
Hi.
Cf. issues 764 and 823.
What would be the preferred class to be used as the RNG in a
distribution's default constructor?
Regards,
Gilles
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands,
Hi,
I finalized now this feature request (MATH-235) by adding more random
data test which success for an epsilon of 1e-12, which imho is pretty
good for now.
For the problem with the internal DecompositionSolver, I now throw an
MathUnsupportedOperationException when trying to get a solver for a
d
Great questions. I'm eager to find out what everyone thinks.
-Elijah
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> another question: since chain2 breaks all kind of backward
> compatibility with previous version... does it really makes sense
> keeping the @since tag?
>
> TIA!
>
> -Sim
another question: since chain2 breaks all kind of backward
compatibility with previous version... does it really makes sense
keeping the @since tag?
TIA!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
Hello,
we discussed already a lot on this for other components, anyway it
would be better discussing it before modifying the code:
* is it OK to drop @author tags? original authors, committers and
contributors are already mentioned in the pom
* @version: actually, there is a mix of $Id$, $Revi
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
Thanks for a detail explanation, will see what I can come up with
-D
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If you take a peek at the FTP and HTTP test case, it will all make sense.
>
> We should test VFS with *something*, since VFS is a client, we need a
> server, which
Hi,
If you take a peek at the FTP and HTTP test case, it will all make sense.
We should test VFS with *something*, since VFS is a client, we need a
server, which goes up and down with the test suite.
Short of that, using Mockito, Power Mock or some other mocking framework
might make sense as an
On 18 July 2012 16:50, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Jul 18, 2012, at 9:37, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 18 July 2012 13:28, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:53 AM, sebb wrote:
>>>
On 18 July 2012 12:49, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Ideally:
>
> - Implement the test case such that
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 02:04:43AM +0300, ori ziv wrote:
> * I updated the files (at
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4481581/commons-math-suggestions.zip)
> * I added the checkProbability method . Do you think that the
> isProbability should not be public?
> * I added an exception with a customized messa
I am confuse here, you are asking me to embed a cifs server ( which
have not found a java implementation yet, jcifs itself only contain
client part ), and someone's SMB server. These 2 are contradicting.
Am I missing something?
Thanks
-D
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> O
On Jul 18, 2012, at 11:05, Dan Tran wrote:
> Questions:
>
> 1. So that i can plan out our own release, what is the 'potential'
> time frame we may see another release of VFS?
Any time. Rolling a release takes anywhere from a week or a couple of
weeks depending on what needs to be done.
For the
On Jul 18, 2012, at 9:37, sebb wrote:
> On 18 July 2012 13:28, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:53 AM, sebb wrote:
>>
>>> On 18 July 2012 12:49, Gary Gregory wrote:
Ideally:
- Implement the test case such that it starts and stops an embedded Samba
server, li
Questions:
1. So that i can plan out our own release, what is the 'potential'
time frame we may see another release of VFS?
2. In term of test. Are you suggesting me to use a embedded CIFS
server or use 'someone' SMB server?
Thanks
-D
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 4:49 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
These questions about license compatibility bring to mind the difficulty
that most developers have with frameworks like VFS which have multiple
plugin implementations. Because of license incompabilities, the plugins
are often not part of the main VFS distribution. This means, that you may
consid
> Are the transitive dependencies actually included in the assembly?
>
> If not, then the L&N files should not mention them.
yes they are in the -bin(.tar.gz|.zip) assemblies, that is the reason
why I had to include special L&N, due to digester transitive
dependency (CGLIB and ASM)
thanks for rev
On 18 July 2012 14:18, wrote:
> Author: simonetripodi
> Date: Wed Jul 18 13:18:11 2012
> New Revision: 1362934
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1362934&view=rev
> Log:
> include bin dependencies to -bin packages (mainly ASF commons components,
> with deps) and special L&N to cover diges
On 18 July 2012 13:28, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:53 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 18 July 2012 12:49, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > Ideally:
>> >
>> > - Implement the test case such that it starts and stops an embedded Samba
>> > server, like other tests do (see HTTP, FTP, and so on.)
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-jmx has an issue affecting its community integration.
T
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:53 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 18 July 2012 12:49, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Ideally:
> >
> > - Implement the test case such that it starts and stops an embedded Samba
> > server, like other tests do (see HTTP, FTP, and so on.) This will require
> > using someone's Smb server.
>
> Why is this in a profile?
> Normally it is a top level.
because it is the RC site deployment
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
--
On 18 July 2012 12:49, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Ideally:
>
> - Implement the test case such that it starts and stops an embedded Samba
> server, like other tests do (see HTTP, FTP, and so on.) This will require
> using someone's Smb server.
>
> Once that is in place:
>
> - Migrate to the current vers
Ideally:
- Implement the test case such that it starts and stops an embedded Samba
server, like other tests do (see HTTP, FTP, and so on.) This will require
using someone's Smb server.
Once that is in place:
- Migrate to the current version of JCIFS.
Then:
- Fill in holes in tests (if any)
- F
On 18 July 2012 12:11, wrote:
> Author: simonetripodi
> Date: Wed Jul 18 11:11:28 2012
> New Revision: 1362881
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1362881&view=rev
> Log:
> added RC profile for site deploying
>
> Modified:
> commons/proper/chain/trunk/pom.xml
>
> Modified: commons/prope
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=23952&projectId=69
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Wed 18 Jul 2012 11:20:06 +
Finished at: Wed 18 Jul 2012 11:20:30 +
Total time: 24s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build N
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-io-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This iss
supporting the smb protocol in [VFS] looks very interesting - I hope
VFS maintainers are interested as well!
FWIW, I am +1 on this.
thanks for contributing back!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99sof
40 matches
Mail list logo
