To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-graph has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-vfs2-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
On 2 April 2012 17:35, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:30 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> Back in October 2011, there was an Incubator thread about the
>> possibility of BeanShell being moved to the ASF.
>> Reactions were generally positive, but nothing actually happened.
>> I'd like to rest
I read the thread and thought BeanShell would fit to Commons... I
think there are only a few committers.
OGNL is in the same vein too. I would oppose if the BS developers are
not willing to continue the project here. This is not very likely the
case here
Cheers,
Christian
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:30 PM, sebb wrote:
> Back in October 2011, there was an Incubator thread about the
> possibility of BeanShell being moved to the ASF.
> Reactions were generally positive, but nothing actually happened.
> I'd like to restart the process, assuming the original authors are
Back in October 2011, there was an Incubator thread about the
possibility of BeanShell being moved to the ASF.
Reactions were generally positive, but nothing actually happened.
I'd like to restart the process, assuming the original authors are
still willing.
If BeanShell is to be housed at the ASF
On 2 April 2012 15:50, sebb wrote:
> On 2 April 2012 15:13, sebb wrote:
>> On 2 April 2012 15:07, sebb wrote:
>>> On 2 April 2012 15:03, Gump wrote:
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gu
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> WRT https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-96
>
> (Moving discussion to ML from JIRA)
>
> OK, I see the Clirr errors now after applying CODEX-96-2.patch locally. It
> looks like normal users would not be affected. The issue is only if a c
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=20811&projectId=80
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Mon 2 Apr 2012 15:09:32 +
Finished at: Mon 2 Apr 2012 15:10:59 +
Total time: 1m 26s
Build Trigger: Forced
Buil
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=20809&projectId=80
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Mon 2 Apr 2012 14:55:17 +
Finished at: Mon 2 Apr 2012 14:56:45 +
Total time: 1m 27s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build Nu
On 2 April 2012 15:13, sebb wrote:
> On 2 April 2012 15:07, sebb wrote:
>> On 2 April 2012 15:03, Gump wrote:
>>> To whom it may engage...
>>>
>>> This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
>>> more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
>>> and/or contac
On 2 April 2012 15:07, sebb wrote:
> On 2 April 2012 15:03, Gump wrote:
>> To whom it may engage...
>>
>> This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
>> more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
>> and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
>>
>>
On 2 April 2012 15:03, Gump wrote:
> To whom it may engage...
>
> This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
> more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
> and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
>
> Project commons-exec-test has an issue affec
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
On 2 April 2012 07:40, Gump wrote:
> To whom it may engage...
>
> This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
> more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
> and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
>
> Project commons-vfs2-test has an issue affec
On 2 April 2012 05:54, Gump wrote:
> To whom it may engage...
>
> This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
> more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
> and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
>
> Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affe
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-id has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue af
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
20 matches
Mail list logo
