[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-03-22 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-03-22 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community integrati

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-03-22 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-collections4-testframework (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-03-22 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-collections4-testframework has an issue affecting its community i

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-graph (in module commons-sandbox) failed

2012-03-22 Thread commons-graph development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-graph has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-exec-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-03-22 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-digester3 (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-03-22 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons - Commons Codec - Default Maven 2 Build Definition (Java 1.5)

2012-03-22 Thread Continuum@vmbuild
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=20433&projectId=70 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Ok Started at: Fri 23 Mar 2012 00:20:13 + Finished at: Fri 23 Mar 2012 00:20:59 + Total time: 45s Build Trigger: Schedule Build N

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons - Commons IO - Default Maven 2 Build Definition (Java 1.5)

2012-03-22 Thread Continuum@vmbuild
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=20430&projectId=83 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Ok Started at: Thu 22 Mar 2012 23:20:27 + Finished at: Thu 22 Mar 2012 23:22:21 + Total time: 1m 54s Build Trigger: Schedule Buil

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.2-RC3

2012-03-22 Thread Gary Gregory
FYI: I'm heading out of town for the weekend so I am not sure I'll be able to spin a new RC before I leave. Best case: new RC tonight, worst case: new RC Monday. Gary On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > This vote is canceled due to bugs, see IO-311 and IO-312. The lack of test

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.2-RC3

2012-03-22 Thread Gary Gregory
This vote is canceled due to bugs, see IO-311 and IO-312. The lack of test coverage is to blame. Some of the new 2.2 methods had no test coverage. Gary On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 4:52 PM, sebb wrote: > On 22 March 2012 20:10, sebb wrote: > > On 22 March 2012 19:27, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> On Ma

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.2-RC3

2012-03-22 Thread sebb
On 22 March 2012 20:10, sebb wrote: > On 22 March 2012 19:27, Gary Gregory wrote: >> On Mar 22, 2012, at 15:19, sebb wrote: >> >>> On 22 March 2012 19:03, Gary Gregory wrote: On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:24 PM, sebb wrote: > On 22 March 2012 17:21, sebb wrote: >> Presumably you

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.2-RC3

2012-03-22 Thread sebb
On 22 March 2012 19:27, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Mar 22, 2012, at 15:19, sebb wrote: > >> On 22 March 2012 19:03, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:24 PM, sebb wrote: >>> On 22 March 2012 17:21, sebb wrote: > Presumably you have seen IO-311 ? > > -1 to proceedi

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.2-RC3

2012-03-22 Thread Gary Gregory
On Mar 22, 2012, at 15:19, sebb wrote: > On 22 March 2012 19:03, Gary Gregory wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:24 PM, sebb wrote: >> >>> On 22 March 2012 17:21, sebb wrote: Presumably you have seen IO-311 ? -1 to proceeding with release until this is investigated, and resolve

Re: [csv] Improving readability in CSVLexer

2012-03-22 Thread sebb
On 22 March 2012 10:40, sebb wrote: > On 22 March 2012 07:33, Benedikt Ritter wrote: >> Am 22. März 2012 00:19 schrieb sebb : >>> On 21 March 2012 19:16, Benedikt Ritter wrote: Hey, I've tried to remove the Token input parameter in CSVLexer.nextToken(). First by creating ne n

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.2-RC3

2012-03-22 Thread sebb
On 22 March 2012 19:03, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:24 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On 22 March 2012 17:21, sebb wrote: >> > Presumably you have seen IO-311 ? >> > >> > -1 to proceeding with release until this is investigated, and resolved >> > as appropriate. >> >> I don't mean canc

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.2-RC3

2012-03-22 Thread Gary Gregory
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:24 PM, sebb wrote: > On 22 March 2012 17:21, sebb wrote: > > Presumably you have seen IO-311 ? > > > > -1 to proceeding with release until this is investigated, and resolved > > as appropriate. > > I don't mean cancel the release vote - at least not just yet - but the >

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.2-RC3

2012-03-22 Thread sebb
On 22 March 2012 17:21, sebb wrote: > Presumably you have seen IO-311 ? > > -1 to proceeding with release until this is investigated, and resolved > as appropriate. I don't mean cancel the release vote - at least not just yet - but the issue needs to be evaluated before proceeding further with th

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.2-RC3

2012-03-22 Thread sebb
Presumably you have seen IO-311 ? -1 to proceeding with release until this is investigated, and resolved as appropriate. On 21 March 2012 22:23, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Thomas Neidhart > wrote: > >> On 03/18/2012 08:03 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >> > Hello All: >> > >

Re: [ognl] Old issues....

2012-03-22 Thread Olivier Lamy
Maybe swizzle can help: http://swizzle.codehaus.org/Jira+Migration 2012/3/22 Christian Grobmeier : > 2012/3/22 Łukasz Lenart : >> 2012/3/21 Christian Grobmeier : >> I don't know, maybe this is against ASF law or so ... > > oh... good question. But maybe copy/paste can be seen as some kind of > "ma

Re: [csv] Improving readability in CSVLexer

2012-03-22 Thread sebb
On 22 March 2012 07:33, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Am 22. März 2012 00:19 schrieb sebb : >> On 21 March 2012 19:16, Benedikt Ritter wrote: >>> Hey, >>> >>> I've tried to remove the Token input parameter in CSVLexer.nextToken(). >>> First by creating ne new Token on every invocation of nextToken().

Re: [ognl] Old issues....

2012-03-22 Thread Christian Grobmeier
2012/3/22 Łukasz Lenart : > 2012/3/21 Christian Grobmeier : > I don't know, maybe this is against ASF law or so ... oh... good question. But maybe copy/paste can be seen as some kind of "manual export" plugin? :-) > and it'll take > some time to manually copy all issues with comments and attachme

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-vfs2-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-03-22 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-vfs2-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-id (in module commons-sandbox) failed

2012-03-22 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-id has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue af

Re: [ognl] Old issues....

2012-03-22 Thread Łukasz Lenart
2012/3/21 Christian Grobmeier : > Thanks for following up Lukasz! > > But... is it worth the trouble? Copy/Paste is an option. I don't know, maybe this is against ASF law or so ... and it'll take some time to manually copy all issues with comments and attachments. Maybe some tool ? Regards -- Ł

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-03-22 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-03-22 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community integrati

Re: [csv] Improving readability in CSVLexer

2012-03-22 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Am 22. März 2012 00:19 schrieb sebb : > On 21 March 2012 19:16, Benedikt Ritter wrote: >> Hey, >> >> I've tried to remove the Token input parameter in CSVLexer.nextToken(). >> First by creating ne new Token on every invocation of nextToken(). >> That slowed execution of that method by about 100ms.