To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
Hi all,
due to binary backward compatibility violation - introduced by myself
:P - the actual vote can be considered cancelled.
I'll cut a new RC tomorrow morning, thanks everybody who took part to
the review!
All the best,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.live
my bad and apologize guys, I'll cut a new RC tomorrow!!!
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2012, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>
>
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012, sebb wrote:
On 28 January 2012 17:46, wrote:
Author: nick
Date: Sat Jan 28 17:46:58 2012
New Revision: 1237106
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1237106&view=rev
Log:
Update the ibiblio URLs for downloading dependencies
Why not download from Maven Central?
I was a
On 28 January 2012 17:46, wrote:
> Author: nick
> Date: Sat Jan 28 17:46:58 2012
> New Revision: 1237106
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1237106&view=rev
> Log:
> Update the ibiblio URLs for downloading dependencies
Why not download from Maven Central?
> Modified:
> commons/proper/
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012, Niall Pemberton wrote:
The problem was introduced 3 weeks ago in r1227700 when ResultStatus was
changed from being an inner class to a static inner class.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1227700
I've committed a deprecated, overloaded constructor for t
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2012, Oliver Heger wrote:
>>
>> I had problems with the ant build, there were compilation errors. I am not
>> sure whether I have to define the paths to dependent libraries in
>> build.properties. This is not mentioned in the buil
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012, Oliver Heger wrote:
I had problems with the ant build, there were compilation errors. I am
not sure whether I have to define the paths to dependent libraries in
build.properties. This is not mentioned in the building instructions,
and build.xml tries to download some librar
Hi Oliver!
unfortunately I just provided my help on cutting the RC - I cc'ed Nick
who's the last mastermind behind [validator], hopefully is just a
missing note!!
Thanks for reviewing!!!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simon
Hi Simone,
the build with Maven runs fine with Java 1.5 on Windows 7, artifacts and
side look good.
I had problems with the ant build, there were compilation errors. I am
not sure whether I have to define the paths to dependent libraries in
build.properties. This is not mentioned in the buil
Whoopse, forgot to add the patch ;-) here it is...
Am 28.01.2012 15:28, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
Hi Simo,
thanks for your answer! have a look at my inline comments:
Am 28.01.2012 08:26, schrieb Simone Tripodi:
Hi Benedikt,
thanks for investing your spare time on contributing on BeanUtils2!
Ple
Hi Simo,
thanks for your answer! have a look at my inline comments:
Am 28.01.2012 08:26, schrieb Simone Tripodi:
Hi Benedikt,
thanks for investing your spare time on contributing on BeanUtils2!
Please read my inline comments:
Complex methods: I know, that BeanUtils2 is just an experiment, and
Le 27/01/2012 20:44, Sébastien Brisard a écrit :
> Hi Luc,
> thanks for this answer.
>>>
>>> My problem is that I do not know what getSolverAbsoluteAccuracy()
>>> should return. I see three options
>>> 1. Have getSolverAbsoluteAccuracy() throw an
>>> UnsupportedOperationException, as the solver is
this is my +1, I reviewed all the steps, I'm quite comfortable this RC is fine
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2012,
Dear all,
I know it's not the time to open new issues, but this one should be
quickly solved (I promise!), and I think it would really improve the
whole framework for iterative linear solvers. Anyway, please have a
look to what I've written. Also, I really need some feedback on point
#4, which I r
16 matches
Mail list logo
