To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-sanselan-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
Th
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-net-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This is
+1
happy new year!!!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Good day to you all:
>
> I have prepared Commons Pool 1.6-RC2.
>
> The chang
Cancelled for bad release notes and extra SNAPSHOT jars in bin distro.
Gary
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hello Gary,
>
> thanks for the hard work!
>
> While testing I saw there hashed asc files online, like:
> commons-pool-1.6-sources.jar.asc.md5
> To my knowledg
Thank you for the review Christian,
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hello Gary,
>
> thanks for the hard work!
>
> While testing I saw there hashed asc files online, like:
> commons-pool-1.6-sources.jar.asc.md5
> To my knowledge they are not necessary and can be remov
Thank for the inspection Oliver.
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Oliver Heger wrote:
> Build works fine with Java 1.5 on Windows 7. Site looks good. However, I
> found some problems with the distributions:
>
> - The release notes are for the 1.5.7 version.
> - The binary distribution contains
2011/12/31 Luc Maisonobe :
> Le 31/12/2011 15:50, Sébastien Brisard a écrit :
>> Hi,
>> In rev 1226041, I committed a patch proposed by Christian (see
>> MATH-692). Unfortunately, I didn't notice that this patch causes the
>> failure of Well1024aTest. Since this morning, I've been looking into
>> t
Build works fine with Java 1.5 on Windows 7. Site looks good. However, I
found some problems with the distributions:
- The release notes are for the 1.5.7 version.
- The binary distribution contains duplicate jars labeled as 1.6-SNAPSHOT.
I think, this is sufficient for a -1.
Oliver
Am 30.12.2
Le 31/12/2011 15:50, Sébastien Brisard a écrit :
> Hi,
> In rev 1226041, I committed a patch proposed by Christian (see
> MATH-692). Unfortunately, I didn't notice that this patch causes the
> failure of Well1024aTest. Since this morning, I've been looking into
> that failure. I don't think that an
Hi,
In rev 1226041, I committed a patch proposed by Christian (see
MATH-692). Unfortunately, I didn't notice that this patch causes the
failure of Well1024aTest. Since this morning, I've been looking into
that failure. I don't think that any of Christian's proposed
modifications is to be incriminat
Hi Luc,
>
> I'm not familiar with statistics. Perhaps you could try to isolate the
> change (which may be the pseudo-random generator seeding) and commit it
> separately, changing the tests reference value if needed (I'm not sure I
> am clear here).
>
yes you are ;)
>
> Luc
>
In fact, I can't see a
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-net-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This is
On Dec 31, 2011, at 3:46, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Three changes of interest. Two are the removal of final on public
> methods. The other is the addition of Serializable to StrBuilder.
>
> Which is the worry? And is it a big enough worry to not keep the change?
I am asking because we have been mak
Hello Gary,
thanks for the hard work!
While testing I saw there hashed asc files online, like:
commons-pool-1.6-sources.jar.asc.md5
To my knowledge they are not necessary and can be removed from Nexus
(just chose and remove).
Notice does include copyright until 2011, but tomorrow is 2012 ;-) Non
Hello Simone,
interesting. If I understand correctly they basically use a
ConcurrentHashMap to put expression in it somewhere at parsing level?
Looking in the current code of ognl, i cannot see such a
functionality. Anyway, everything which is speeding up things is
welcome, imho (ok,almost) ;-)
C
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=16598&projectId=97
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sat 31 Dec 2011 10:38:14 +
Finished at: Sat 31 Dec 2011 10:41:55 +
Total time: 3m 41s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Le 31/12/2011 09:36, Sébastien Brisard a écrit :
> 2011/12/31 Continuum@vmbuild :
>> Online report :
>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=16588&projectId=97
>>
>> Build statistics:
>> State: Failed
>> Previous State: Ok
>> Started at: Sat 31 Dec 2011 05:40:12 +
Hej, Dims,
you active again? That's fine!
Jochen
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 8:49 PM, wrote:
> Author: dims
> Date: Fri Jul 21 11:49:03 2006
> New Revision: 424415
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=424415&view=rev
> Log:
> fix minimum jdk version as 1.3
>
> Modified:
> jakarta/commons/
Hi all OGNLers,
at MyBatis (which is OGNL client, just an older version) we received
feedbacks from Alfresco team that had to alter the OGNL caching
policy[1] to speedup the performances (just look for OGNL).
WDYT respect the work done to improve our caches?
TIA,
-Simo
[1]
http://svn.alfresco.com
Three changes of interest. Two are the removal of final on public
methods. The other is the addition of Serializable to StrBuilder.
Which is the worry? And is it a big enough worry to not keep the change?
Hen
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 6:07 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Fire it up! :)
>
> Despite what
2011/12/31 Continuum@vmbuild :
> Online report :
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=16588&projectId=97
>
> Build statistics:
> State: Failed
> Previous State: Ok
> Started at: Sat 31 Dec 2011 05:40:12 +
> Finished at: Sat 31 Dec 2011 05:43:49 +
> Total ti
22 matches
Mail list logo
