Re: [math] SimpleRegression

2011-08-22 Thread Phil Steitz
On 8/22/11 8:42 PM, Greg Sterijevski wrote: > If no one has objections, I would like to harmonize simpleregression with > the Regression Interfaces. What is the best way to proceed? JFDI - go ahead and take a stab at a patch to do it. Phil > > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Greg Sterijevski >

Re: [math] SimpleRegression

2011-08-22 Thread Greg Sterijevski
If no one has objections, I would like to harmonize simpleregression with the Regression Interfaces. What is the best way to proceed? On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Greg Sterijevski wrote: > Opened a ticket. Submitted patches. -Greg > > > On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > >>

Re: [math] RealMatrix.set(double)

2011-08-22 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Maybe setAllEntries? That would be consistent with setEntry? What about RealVector? The method set(double) should be renamed also? Sébastien 2011/8/22 Ted Dunning : > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> I think it would be good to add this, but it would probably be >> better

Re: [codec] next releases

2011-08-22 Thread sebb
On 23 August 2011 03:32, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hi All: > > After the last round of discussion WRT generics, a 2.0, version, and the new > BM encoder, it seems the consensus is: > > - Release a version based on trunk. Trunk requires Java 5 and includes the > new BM encoder. > > - Revert the trunk c

[codec] next releases

2011-08-22 Thread Gary Gregory
Hi All: After the last round of discussion WRT generics, a 2.0, version, and the new BM encoder, it seems the consensus is: - Release a version based on trunk. Trunk requires Java 5 and includes the new BM encoder. - Revert the trunk changes that break binary compatibility, specifically, based o

[Math] TridiagonalTransformer

2011-08-22 Thread Greg Sterijevski
Hello All, In TriaDiagonalTransformer, I notice the following (commencing at line 104). final double[] hK = householderVectors[k - 1]; final double inv = 1.0 / (secondary[k - 1] * hK[k]); cachedQt.setEntry(k, k, 1); if (hK[k] != 0.0

Re: [math] RealMatrix.set(double)

2011-08-22 Thread Ted Dunning
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > I think it would be good to add this, but it would probably be > better to give it a different name. What name, I am not sure. > Maybe setAll or fill. Might also be useful to have versions that > fill submatrics. > Mahout allows this via ov

Re: [math] RealMatrix.set(double)

2011-08-22 Thread Phil Steitz
I think it would be good to add this, but it would probably be better to give it a different name. What name, I am not sure. Maybe setAll or fill. Might also be useful to have versions that fill submatrics. Here is a little joke to lighten things up a bit. What if we just allow people to spe

Re: Releasing components

2011-08-22 Thread ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:56 AM, sebb wrote: > On 22 August 2011 19:42, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com > > > > I'm not a fan of deleting things until I'm sure I didn't screw it up. > > Unfortunately, neither of the two web pages I referenced are completely > > clear on this part of things. > > WHi

[math] RealMatrix.set(double)

2011-08-22 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hi, I believe that in o.a.c.m.linear.RealMatrix, there is no method set(double) which would set *all* entries to the same value. Such a method exists (and is useful) in o.a.c.m.linear.RealVector. I propose (if you think that could be useful) to open a JIRA issue. Thanks for your comments! Sébastien

[math] MATH-646

2011-08-22 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hi, I've just posted a new patch for the implementation of UnmodifiableRealVector. Thanks for your comments! Sébastien - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.

Re: Releasing components

2011-08-22 Thread sebb
On 22 August 2011 19:42, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com wrote: > I've left the 1.0 web site out there as vfs1 for the time being. I figured > I'd delete it once I could verify the new site. Ideally the new site should include links to 1.0 javadocs etc. > The artifacts for 1.0 are still in the dist

Re: Releasing components

2011-08-22 Thread ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
I've left the 1.0 web site out there as vfs1 for the time being. I figured I'd delete it once I could verify the new site. The artifacts for 1.0 are still in the dist directory but I seem to recall only the most current artifacts are supposed to be in there and the older stuff should be archived s

Re: Releasing components

2011-08-22 Thread sebb
On 22 August 2011 19:17, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com wrote: > I have copied the distribution artifacts to people.apache.org:/www/ > www.apache.org/dist/commons/vfs and updated the README.html. > I have published the site to people.apache.org:/www/commons.apache.org/vfs. > I have told Nexus to rele

Releasing components

2011-08-22 Thread ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
I have copied the distribution artifacts to people.apache.org:/www/ www.apache.org/dist/commons/vfs and updated the README.html. I have published the site to people.apache.org:/www/commons.apache.org/vfs. I have told Nexus to release the component from staging. Am I missing anything? Is there some

Re: [chain][discuss] v2 upgrade

2011-08-22 Thread sebb
On 22 August 2011 15:53, Paul Benedict wrote: > Any thoughts on dumping the checked exception? > public interface Command { ... boolean execute(T > context) throws Exception; } No view on whether it is needed or not. I'd just point out that Exceptions are not part of the method signatures used t

Re: [chain][discuss] v2 upgrade

2011-08-22 Thread Paul Benedict
Any thoughts on dumping the checked exception? public interface Command { ... boolean execute(T context) throws Exception; } Paul On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Matt Benson wrote: > I am generally in favor.  I think it could be good to apply his patch > on a branch so we can discuss the clirr

Re: [chain][discuss] v2 upgrade

2011-08-22 Thread Matt Benson
I am generally in favor. I think it could be good to apply his patch on a branch so we can discuss the clirr results and agree on the severity of the (IMHO forgivable) backward-compatibility breaches. Then we will understand the proper path forward with respect to versions and all the changes that

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-08-22 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This