On Jul 19, 2011, at 0:04, Dave Brosius wrote:
> If we can agree that BCEL will have a minimum requirement of 1.5 for the next
> version, then we should probably actually use 1.5 throughout on purpose,
> rather than by accident. I'd be happy to participate in making these changes.
> Can we vote
If we can agree that BCEL will have a minimum requirement of 1.5 for the
next version, then we should probably actually use 1.5 throughout on
purpose, rather than by accident. I'd be happy to participate in making
these changes. Can we vote on that part of it at least, so that work
could start?
On 2011-07-19, Torsten Curdt wrote:
>>> I say what I've said all this time when questions like this came up.
>>> We need testers! There has been quite few changes. Just releasing
>>> without some people spending some time ...or telling us "yes, trunk
>>> works for me!" I am still not comfortable w
Vote passes [!]
6 +1s.
Gary Gregory
Matt Benson
Oliver Heger
Jörg Schaible
Stephen Colebourne
and my own implicit +1.
I'll start dredging up the 'how to push a release' knowledge tonight :)
Hen
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 relea
All,
I have pushed the implementation of the Miller Regression technique, along
with some tests. I am sure that there are a lot of sharp corners to file
down and improve. However, I thought it would be prudent to get it out and
then we can further refine the code.
On accuracy:
I seem to match al
Interesting issue; though thankfully it's post RC4 so not an issue wrt
releasing 3.0.
Assuming (for argument's sake) that IO Test depends on Lang & Lang
Test depends on IO; is this bad? I'm not convinced it is. Dealing with
something like that is something the build system needs to know how to
do.
Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> looks there are not objections on adding 3rd parties integration
> modules on [Discovery], I'll take care on it as soon as I receive my
> new laptop with working development environment :)
Is it all about to get a Java SPI that supports arguments for the cto
Apologies, I haven't had much time in the past few months and haven't
really been following. I'm sure you guys have done a great job and am
happy to leave the vote up to you.
Niall
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 1:18 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Thanks Gary.
>
> So 4 +1s.
>
> Stephen, Niall, Paul, Phil,
I think from the quiet reply its apparent that [collections] is pretty
quiet these days. I think [collections] development must focus first
on a release of a Java 5 version of what it has, rather than new code.
Stephen
On 14 July 2011 01:19, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> in order to impr
StringEscapeUtils test includes IOUtils, which it shouldn't. (If its
been added as a dependency, then it needs to be removed, even for
testing)
Stephen
On 18 July 2011 23:41, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Jul 18, 2011, at 18:36, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
>
>> I'm willing to vote +1
>> Although I hav
On Jul 18, 2011, at 18:36, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> I'm willing to vote +1
> Although I haven't checked every recent change, but AFAIK recent
> changes have been minor and my previous issues are resolved.
>
> I would note that the svn as of right now does not compile, due to an
> IOUtils refer
I'm willing to vote +1
Although I haven't checked every recent change, but AFAIK recent
changes have been minor and my previous issues are resolved.
I would note that the svn as of right now does not compile, due to an
IOUtils reference that shouldn't be there.
Stephen
On 16 July 2011 01:18, He
> Tomcat 7.0.x is using a sub-set of BCEL for annotation scanning without
> any problems.
using trunk directly? ...or are you saying it's covered through tests
and so it's another project that tests BCEL's usage through Gump?
cheers,
Torsten
--
>> I say what I've said all this time when questions like this came up.
>> We need testers! There has been quite few changes. Just releasing
>> without some people spending some time ...or telling us "yes, trunk
>> works for me!" I am still not comfortable with.
>
> trunk works for everything execu
On 18 July 2011 18:19, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 1:11 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 18 July 2011 15:51, wrote:
>> > Author: ggregory
>> > Date: Mon Jul 18 14:51:14 2011
>> > New Revision: 1147907
>> >
>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1147907&view=rev
>> > Log:
>> > Tests
On 18/07/2011 20:32, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2011-07-18, Torsten Curdt wrote:
>
>>> I'm all for it.
>
>> I say what I've said all this time when questions like this came up.
>> We need testers! There has been quite few changes. Just releasing
>> without some people spending some time ...or tel
On 2011-07-18, Torsten Curdt wrote:
>> I'm all for it.
> I say what I've said all this time when questions like this came up.
> We need testers! There has been quite few changes. Just releasing
> without some people spending some time ...or telling us "yes, trunk
> works for me!" I am still not c
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 1:11 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 18 July 2011 15:51, wrote:
> > Author: ggregory
> > Date: Mon Jul 18 14:51:14 2011
> > New Revision: 1147907
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1147907&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Tests https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-277 (@Ignore'
On 18 July 2011 15:51, wrote:
> Author: ggregory
> Date: Mon Jul 18 14:51:14 2011
> New Revision: 1147907
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1147907&view=rev
> Log:
> Tests https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-277 (@Ignore'd). Port to JUnit
> 4.
>
> Modified:
>
> commons/proper/io
> I'm all for it.
I say what I've said all this time when questions like this came up.
We need testers! There has been quite few changes. Just releasing
without some people spending some time ...or telling us "yes, trunk
works for me!" I am still not comfortable with.
> But there needs to be a de
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Dave Brosius wrote:
> I'm all for it. But there needs to be a decision which seems clear cut to me.
> There is code in the code base (by accident--i suppose) now that requires
> 1.5. Previously we didn't have that requirement, so pushing out a release
> means r
I'm all for it. But there needs to be a decision which seems clear cut to me.
There is code in the code base (by accident--i suppose) now that requires 1.5.
Previously we didn't have that requirement, so pushing out a release means
raising the minimum to 1.5. My vote is lets do it two both. But
Hi!
Almost a year ago, I've asked for a new release of BCEL, in order to
make the annotation handling included in trunk available to the masses.
http://www.mail-archive.com/bcel-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg01121.html
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.bcel.user/1177
There was no reply at
>
>This would be great too. Maybe I could get some contacts with Serge
>Gratton. Cerfacs is in Toulouse and I know for sure many people who have
>direct contact with him. I even think he was present at the same small
>seminar we attended together when you and Nikolaus presented your work
>on CMA-E
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10124&projectId=83
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Mon 18 Jul 2011 15:35:30 +
Finished at: Mon 18 Jul 2011 15:35:50 +
Total time: 19s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build N
Hi all guys,
looks there are not objections on adding 3rd parties integration
modules on [Discovery], I'll take care on it as soon as I receive my
new laptop with working development environment :)
Thanks a lot for your feedbacks Matt!!!
Have a nice day, all the best,
Simo
http://people.apache.org
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On 18 July 2011 05:50, Ralph Goers wrote:
> I don't believe I have rights to do most of this. I don't recall seeing
> textchas on this wiki.
I've added you to the AdminGroup, which means you can now update
LocalBadContent if required.
But see the link Gavin posted for the best way to do this - i
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The "AdminGroup" page has been changed by sebbapache:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/AdminGroup?action=diff&rev1=3&rev2=4
* RahulAkolkar
* HenriYandell
* JörgSchaible
+ * Ral
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The "LocalBadContent" page has been changed by sebbapache:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/LocalBadContent?action=diff&rev1=10&rev2=11
Comment:
Recent spam URL
24h\.msn\.hm
741\.co
30 matches
Mail list logo
