I'm willing to vote +1 Although I haven't checked every recent change, but AFAIK recent changes have been minor and my previous issues are resolved.
I would note that the svn as of right now does not compile, due to an IOUtils reference that shouldn't be there. Stephen On 16 July 2011 01:18, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Gary. > > So 4 +1s. > > Stephen, Niall, Paul, Phil, Sebb, James - nudge to consider voting > (apologies if I missed anyone else who has committed to Lang 3.0)? > > Hen > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> That's true too. In the spirit of release early, release often, I remove my >> -1 :) >> >> Gary >> >> >>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> Less that it is painful (though I agree that it is), more that if you >>>> hold up a release for every bug that comes in then you continually sit >>>> in a non-releasing state. We have a really bad habit of that in >>>> Commons, constantly polishing and polishing before a release. >>>> >>>> Hen >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> > Here is my main issue: we are releasing a major new version and there is >>>> a >>>> > known bug reported by a user which has been fixed in SVN. It feels like >>>> we >>>> > are unwilling to cut a new RC because our build process and validation >>>> is >>>> > painful (it is so in my experience at least, your mileage may vary using >>>> > custom scripts, Nexus, or other incantations.) This is not a good reason >>>> IMO >>>> > to avoid rebuilding. In the case of a major release like 3.0, I do not >>>> want >>>> > to leave a bad taste in a user's mouth with a class that is not fully >>>> baked, >>>> > especially in code new to 3.0. I like that we are planning a 3.0.1, but >>>> I do >>>> > not see why we should not include something that is already fixed for >>>> 3.0. >>>> > It's not like this issue needs more time on investigating, coding, and >>>> > testing. >>>> > >>>> > Now, if you all really think I am being unreasonable, I'll be happy to >>>> go >>>> > with the flow and reverse -1, but for now, I wanted to express my full >>>> POV. >>>> > >>>> > Thank you for reading and talking :) >>>> > >>>> > Gary >>>> > >>>> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> Waiting on you to determine whether your -1 is still there on LANG-720. >>>> >> >>>> >> Then need to poke Niall, Stephen et al to do a review :) >>>> >> >>>> >> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com >>>> > >>>> >> wrote: >>>> >> > -1, let's pick up the committed fix for >>>> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-720 >>>> >> > >>>> >> > I recall seeing traffic in the escape/unescape area so it makes sense >>>> to >>>> >> > polish this new code as much as possible IMO. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Gary >>>> >> > >>>> >> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> >>>> >> > wrote: >>>> >> > >>>> >> >> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> RC4 is available here: >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/ >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> SVN: >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_RC4/ >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Maven artifacts: >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/maven/ >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Website: >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/ >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Note that there is a 2.6->3.0 Clirr report in the site that may >>>> prove >>>> >> >> useful: >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/lang2-lang3-clirr--report.html >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> This vote will close no sooner than in 72 hours time, 0500 GMT 16 >>>> July >>>> >> >> 2011. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> ================ >>>> >> >> [ ] +1 >>>> >> >> [ ] -1, with reason >>>> >> >> ================ >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Hen >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> *fingers crossed - two of my children are younger than the Lang 3.0 >>>> >> >> effort* >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > -- >>>> >> > Thank you, >>>> >> > Gary >>>> >> > >>>> >> > http://garygregory.wordpress.com/ >>>> >> > http://garygregory.com/ >>>> >> > http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/ >>>> >> > http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>>> >> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > Thank you, >>>> > Gary >>>> > >>>> > http://garygregory.wordpress.com/ >>>> > http://garygregory.com/ >>>> > http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/ >>>> > http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>>> > >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thank you, >>> Gary >>> >>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/ >>> http://garygregory.com/ >>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/ >>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Thank you, >> Gary >> >> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/ >> http://garygregory.com/ >> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/ >> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
