To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Ignore the date btw. This vote will close at a time greater than 72
hours (or sooner if I see consensus towards -1).
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again.
>
> RC2 is available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again.
RC2 is available here:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC2/
Maven artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC2/maven/
Website:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC2/site/
Note that the
On Apr 8, 2011, at 21:51, sebb wrote:
> On 9 April 2011 01:21, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> Can we add a test jar to the list please? The apache release profile
>> should take care of it but I want to mention it here explicitly.
>
> Do you mean the "apache-release" profile in Commons Parent 21-SNAPSHO
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>> On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Oliver Heger
>>> wrote:
Two minor points from my side:
>>>
- Just a proposal: T
On 9 April 2011 01:21, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Can we add a test jar to the list please? The apache release profile
> should take care of it but I want to mention it here explicitly.
Do you mean the "apache-release" profile in Commons Parent 21-SNAPSHOT?
That has yet to be voted on or released.
A
Can we add a test jar to the list please? The apache release profile
should take care of it but I want to mention it here explicitly.
Thank you,
Gary
On Apr 8, 2011, at 18:27, sebb wrote:
> I'd like to start a vote for releasing NET 3.0.
> [Note: it's binary-compatible, but not source-compatibl
I'd like to start a vote for releasing NET 3.0.
[Note: it's binary-compatible, but not source-compatible with 2.x, and
it has a lot of new functionality which is why it uses 3.0 rather than
2.3.]
One issue that does not seem to have been resolved is the contents of
the release artifacts.
I'm curr
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Ryan wrote:
> What is the current status of the SCXML project? Is there active development
> going on?
>
There is little active development going on, for two reasons:
(1) What we have works reasonably in its given state
(2) I haven't had much time to continually t
What is the current status of the SCXML project? Is there active development
going on?
I work for an organization that will be using SCXML for telephone IVR system
dialplans, and we would like to use Apache SCXML to help us toward this end.
However, I do not want to use a project that has no activ
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Last and least: what about DISCOVERY-11? Can we consider "WONTFIX" too?
The bug report is not particularly clear. IMO, we should distinguish
between the following cases:
- The methods Service.providers throws an Exception, due to linkage
e
Last and least: what about DISCOVERY-11? Can we consider "WONTFIX" too?
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> thanks for the support! Can you please check my commit r1090196 to
> review if it
Hi all guys,
thanks for the support! Can you please check my commit r1090196 to
review if it could work as fix?
Many thanks in advance!!!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:26
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Jörg Schaible
wrote:
>>> DISCOVERY-6: release 0.5 is targeted for Java5, I don't know if this
>>> issue is still valid - I mean, if there are Java5 implementations
>>> where ClassLoader.getResource() is not supported... I googled a little
>>> and didn't find anyth
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Simone Tripodi
> wrote:
>
>> DISCOVERY-6: release 0.5 is targeted for Java5, I don't know if this
>> issue is still valid - I mean, if there are Java5 implementations
>> where ClassLoader.getResource() is not supported... I googled a litt
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> DISCOVERY-6: release 0.5 is targeted for Java5, I don't know if this
> issue is still valid - I mean, if there are Java5 implementations
> where ClassLoader.getResource() is not supported... I googled a little
> and didn't find anything use
Hi all guys,
I'm here to ask you a kind help/suggestions to close the last 2 open
issues on Discovery:
DISCOVERY-6: release 0.5 is targeted for Java5, I don't know if this
issue is still valid - I mean, if there are Java5 implementations
where ClassLoader.getResource() is not supported... I google
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Oliver Heger
>> wrote:
>>> Two minor points from my side:
>>>
>>
>>> - Just a proposal: There are some translators in the new translate package
>>> whic
Le 08/04/2011 07:36, Simone Tripodi a écrit :
> I'm +1 to keep @inheritDoc, for me it's like @Override
+1 to keep it too. Checkstyle complains otherwise.
Luc
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 1:58 AM, sebb wrote:
>> O
20 matches
Mail list logo
