I will be sending the 1.5.6 release announcement shortly. When
updating the pool website, I started by trying to use trunk, but
found the output confusing, since we are in process of changing the
groupId and package name. I decided, therefore, to publish based on
the updated 1_5_X branch. Once w
-- Forwarded message --
From: Phil Steitz
Date: Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:23 AM
Subject: Re: So when will commons-io 2.1 be released?
To: Gabriele Kahlout
On 4/3/11 11:18 PM, Gabriele Kahlout wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm looking forward to refactor dp4j.com to use [1] before releasing 1.
On 4/3/11 10:44 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Gary!
> I honestly even thought about it, so sorry! :( Since Discovery
> activity has not been hight since 2008, I just thought adding the
> missing generics support and nothing more :(
> I don't think that should be a blocking issue since we've been
>
Hi Gary,
I honestly don't know why, I'm not in the position to reply, but while
trying to release the discovery-0.5-RC1 using mvn3 I got the error
below; after a little investigation I found the wiki page I reported
in my previous message that reports such "issue"...
Simo
[ERROR] Failed to exec
Hi Gary!
I honestly even thought about it, so sorry! :( Since Discovery
activity has not been hight since 2008, I just thought adding the
missing generics support and nothing more :(
I don't think that should be a blocking issue since we've been
"overlooked" them for a long time, BTW if we think th
Warnings :)
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Any thoughts on fixing the 300+ checkstyle errors?
>
> Gary
>
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Simone Tripodi
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all guys!
>> we haven't released a new version of Apache Commons Discovery since
>> 2008 (!!!), since
Any thoughts on fixing the 300+ checkstyle errors?
Gary
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys!
> we haven't released a new version of Apache Commons Discovery since
> 2008 (!!!), since I recently had to use it in a project I thought it
> would have been fine having
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> I've rolled the code back. Now I'm thinking the following are
> candidates to roll back to String:
>
>public static String stripAccents(CharSequence input) {
>public static String capitalize(CharSequence cs) {
>public static Strin
Hi Rahul,
We can find a SCXML relative project in GSoC 2011 ideas list page, it is
interesting, i have assigned it to me. But i think you are the best mentor
candiate for this project, i want to know that if you are interested in
mentoring this project ? If yes, i will be glad to see you and Gavin
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 6:44 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 1 April 2011 02:53, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 3/31/11 6:30 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> Just discovered that Clirr does not complain if the throws clause of a
>>> method or constructor is changed to add a new Exception.
>>> Seemed like a bug at first, but it
I've rolled the code back. Now I'm thinking the following are
candidates to roll back to String:
public static String stripAccents(CharSequence input) {
public static String capitalize(CharSequence cs) {
public static String uncapitalize(CharSequence cs) {
and the following are candid
Agreed (apologies for the delay; life got, and is going to remain, very busy).
We should remove the CharSequence code I added. We should also review
the first batch of CharSequence changes.
I think it's fine to have this:
public int length(CharSequence seq)
I'll look into the removal if no one
Forgot to mention that Vote will be open for 74 hours and will closed
2011-04-06T9:00pm CET :)
good night,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys!
> we haven't released a new version of Apache Co
Why did I not run into this when releasing codec? I used M3.
Gary
On Apr 3, 2011, at 17:04, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Rahul!
> done, but I meant that in mvn3 the scp protocol doesn't come out of
> the box, we need to plug the wagon-ssh extension.
> For releasing the discovery, I switched to mv
Hi all guys!
we haven't released a new version of Apache Commons Discovery since
2008 (!!!), since I recently had to use it in a project I thought it
would have been fine having at least the Java5 generics support.
So, after 2 days of hard work - and thanks for feedbacks from dev
community - I'm he
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Rahul!
> done, but I meant that in mvn3 the scp protocol doesn't come out of
> the box, we need to plug the wagon-ssh extension.
> For releasing the discovery, I switched to mvn2, but for future mvn3
> use I'd suggest to add it in the mave
Hi Rahul!
done, but I meant that in mvn3 the scp protocol doesn't come out of
the box, we need to plug the wagon-ssh extension.
For releasing the discovery, I switched to mvn2, but for future mvn3
use I'd suggest to add it in the maven-3 profile in the parent pom.
Have a nice day, all the best!
Sim
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> due to unsupported 'scp' protocol by default by mvn3[1], I'd suggest
> to add, in the 'maven-3' profile in the commons-parent, the wagon-ssh
> extension.
For now, you could try tweaking the "commons.deployment.protocol"
prope
On 3 April 2011 20:35, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 2:50 AM, Jörg Schaible
> wrote:
>
>> Julius Davies wrote:
>>
>> >>> >> Nothing of this (including minimum requirement of Java 5) requires
>> >>> >> automatically 2.x. As long as the API is *upward* binary compatible,
>> >>> >> you
Hi all guys,
due to unsupported 'scp' protocol by default by mvn3[1], I'd suggest
to add, in the 'maven-3' profile in the commons-parent, the wagon-ssh
extension.
If there isn't any objection, I can take care of it, just let me know.
In the meanwhile, I'd add the wagon-ssh in the [discovery] pom, i
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 2:50 AM, Jörg Schaible
wrote:
> Julius Davies wrote:
>
> >>> >> Nothing of this (including minimum requirement of Java 5) requires
> >>> >> automatically 2.x. As long as the API is *upward* binary compatible,
> >>> >> you can
> >>> >> improve the implementation using this fe
Done, thanks for the feedbacks! My Eclipse warning filters were just a
little too relaxed... :)
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Apr 3, 2011, at 9:59, sebb wrote:
>
>> ... e.g. missing @Override, unnecessa
thanks! of course it wasn't my intention :P
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 3:53 PM, wrote:
> Author: sebb
> Date: Sun Apr 3 13:53:54 2011
> New Revision: 1088302
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1088302&view=rev
> Log:
> Castin
On 4/3/11 7:33 AM, l...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: luc
> Date: Sun Apr 3 14:33:00 2011
> New Revision: 1088315
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1088315&view=rev
> Log:
> allow 3 retries for testNextHex which is expected to randomly fail with low
> probability
Why not just change this to
On Apr 3, 2011, at 9:59, sebb wrote:
> ... e.g. missing @Override, unnecessary cast.
>
> I think these should be fixed before proceeding to a vote
+1.
Gary
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> Fo
... e.g. missing @Override, unnecessary cast.
I think these should be fixed before proceeding to a vote
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On 3 April 2011 14:20, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> I would be moe than pleased to follow the Nexus way, but I'm following
Looks like Discovery is not using Nexus anyway.
> the guide on Wiki[1] to avoid mistakes.
> Any recommendation? Thanks in advance!
> Simo
>
> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/commons/C
Hi all guys,
while attempting to release the RC1 release of digester-05, I got the
following error:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-deploy-plugin:2.5:deploy
(default-deploy) on project commons-discovery: Failed to deploy
artifacts/metadata: No connector available
done, thanks!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 3:15 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 3 April 2011 01:04, wrote:
>> Author: simonetripodi
>> Date: Sun Apr 3 00:04:15 2011
>> New Revision: 1088190
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=10881
I suppose that's a mistake we inherited from the past, going to fix
the properties.
thanks,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 3:18 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 2 April 2011 23:25, wrote:
>> Author: simonetripodi
>> Date: Sat Apr 2 22:25:03 2
I would be moe than pleased to follow the Nexus way, but I'm following
the guide on Wiki[1] to avoid mistakes.
Any recommendation? Thanks in advance!
Simo
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at
On 2 April 2011 23:25, wrote:
> Author: simonetripodi
> Date: Sat Apr 2 22:25:03 2011
> New Revision: 1088165
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1088165&view=rev
> Log:
> added missing ASF license header
>
> Modified:
>
> commons/proper/discovery/trunk/src/test/META-INF/services/org.a
OK, removing the release, thanks for reviewing
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 3:12 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 3 April 2011 01:29, wrote:
>> Author: simonetripodi
>> Date: Sun Apr 3 00:29:56 2011
>> New Revision: 1088197
>>
>> URL: http:
On 3 April 2011 01:04, wrote:
> Author: simonetripodi
> Date: Sun Apr 3 00:04:15 2011
> New Revision: 1088190
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1088190&view=rev
> Log:
> improved project description
>
> Modified:
> commons/proper/discovery/trunk/pom.xml
>
> Modified: commons/proper/di
On 3 April 2011 01:23, wrote:
> Author: simonetripodi
> Date: Sun Apr 3 00:23:32 2011
> New Revision: 1088193
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1088193&view=rev
> Log:
> added missing RC profile (cannot be defined in parent)
Not sure this is needed if one uses Nexus, but won't do any ha
On 3 April 2011 01:29, wrote:
> Author: simonetripodi
> Date: Sun Apr 3 00:29:56 2011
> New Revision: 1088197
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1088197&view=rev
> Log:
> added estimated next release
Not sure that's a good idea.
The DOAP is normally updated when the release has been mad
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
38 matches
Mail list logo
