Re: [exec] Use of System.out in unit tests

2011-02-03 Thread Jörg Schaible
sebb wrote: > On 3 February 2011 21:02, Gary Gregory > wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I see a lot of noise on the console when running [exec] unit tests (from >> Maven, Eclipse, and so on.) >> >> I would like to remove calls to System.out from the unit tests. >> >> IMO, unit tests should assert all they

Re: Feathercast on Apache Commons

2011-02-03 Thread Phil Steitz
On 2/3/11 12:11 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > Our own Gary Gregory being interviewed by Feathercast.org: > > http://feathercast.org/?p=97 > Great job, Gary! I especially like the part about "use our stuff any way you want" and the great invitation to contribute. Thank you! Phil >

Re: [math] deciding about 2.2

2011-02-03 Thread sebb
On 4 February 2011 01:15, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 2/3/11 7:18 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 06:11:19PM -0500, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> On 2/3/11 5:02 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: >>> [...] >> It seems the thread asking for help on the exception API design is going >

Re: [math] deciding about 2.2

2011-02-03 Thread Phil Steitz
On 2/3/11 7:18 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 06:11:19PM -0500, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 2/3/11 5:02 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: >> [...] > It seems the thread asking for help on the exception API design is going > to be fruitful, and it starts well with interesting

Re: [math] deciding about 2.2

2011-02-03 Thread Gilles Sadowski
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 06:11:19PM -0500, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 2/3/11 5:02 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > [...] > >>> It seems the thread asking for help on the exception API design is going > >>> to be fruitful, and it starts well with interesting ideas. I guess some > >>> of these ideas wil

Re: [exec] Use of System.out in unit tests

2011-02-03 Thread sebb
On 3 February 2011 21:02, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hi All, > > I see a lot of noise on the console when running [exec] unit tests (from > Maven, Eclipse, and so on.) > > I would like to remove calls to System.out from the unit tests. > > IMO, unit tests should assert all they need and put any error

Re: [math] deciding about 2.2

2011-02-03 Thread Phil Steitz
On 2/3/11 5:02 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: [...] >>> It seems the thread asking for help on the exception API design is going >>> to be fruitful, and it starts well with interesting ideas. I guess some >>> of these ideas will change again our view and we will converge >>> (hopefully not throwin

Re: [math] deciding about 2.2

2011-02-03 Thread Gilles Sadowski
> >> [...] > > > > It seems the thread asking for help on the exception API design is going > > to be fruitful, and it starts well with interesting ideas. I guess some > > of these ideas will change again our view and we will converge > > (hopefully not throwing an exception ourselves ...) to a sta

[exec] Use of System.out in unit tests

2011-02-03 Thread Gary Gregory
Hi All, I see a lot of noise on the console when running [exec] unit tests (from Maven, Eclipse, and so on.) I would like to remove calls to System.out from the unit tests. IMO, unit tests should assert all they need and put any error information in assert messages, not the console. Thoughts?

Re: [math] deciding about 2.2 (was Re: [all][math] Help wanted with exceptions API design)

2011-02-03 Thread Phil Steitz
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 02/02/2011 05:54, Phil Steitz a écrit : >> On 2/1/11 2:06 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >>> Le 01/02/2011 18:22, Jörg Schaible a écrit : Hi, Phil Steitz wrote: > We are in process of redesigning our exceptions hierarchy i

Re: [sandbox] wrong page on the commons site

2011-02-03 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:51 PM, wrote: > Hello, > > I tried to check if the new sandbox page was online now, but it seems to me > that it is simply a copy of the main page, not a sandbox specific > . > > Do you see the same problem ? Doh! Sorry looks like I

[sandbox] wrong page on the commons site

2011-02-03 Thread luc . maisonobe
Hello, I tried to check if the new sandbox page was online now, but it seems to me that it is simply a copy of the main page, not a sandbox specific . Do you see the same problem ? Luc - To

Re: [pool] potential new method for interface ObjectPool

2011-02-03 Thread Zoltan Farkas
Hi Simone, Currently validating an object is supported at borrowing and returning time. In high throughput scenarios validating at borrowing time or returning time might be impractical. In that case validation am be done only in the background thread. However, when catching an exception durin

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-02-03 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-quartz (in module commons-jelly) failed

2011-02-03 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-quartz has an issue affecting its community integratio

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-02-03 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This