To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-sanselan-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
Th
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-collections4 has an issue affecting its community integration.
Thi
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Mikkel Meyer Andersen wrote:
> Should I open a new issue for trunk (3.0) or how should I deal with
> the issue tracking?
>
We can use the same issue for both. The fix version is 2.2. Just reference
the issue in the commit to trunk.
Phil
> 2010/12/26 Phil Stei
Should I open a new issue for trunk (3.0) or how should I deal with
the issue tracking?
2010/12/26 Phil Steitz (JIRA) :
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12975178#action_12975178
> ]
>
2010/12/26 Phil Steitz :
> 2010/12/26 Mikkel Meyer Andersen
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> After a very busy December, I've actually just started on finishing
>> MATH-384 and MATH-385 today (as you might see, I've assigned them to
>> myself some hours ago). So they should be finished within this week
>> (the smal
2010/12/26 Luc Maisonobe
> Le 26/12/2010 19:43, Phil Steitz a écrit :
> > Here's what we have left:
> >
> > MATH-327 - Push out to 3.0 or resolve as Invalid?
>
> For now, I would prefer to simply push it to 3.0. It is a numerical
> problem, but I think we should be able to handle it. Unfortunatel
Le 26/12/2010 19:43, Phil Steitz a écrit :
> Here's what we have left:
>
> MATH-327 - Push out to 3.0 or resolve as Invalid?
For now, I would prefer to simply push it to 3.0. It is a numerical
problem, but I think we should be able to handle it. Unfortunately, that
would mean reimplementing the S
2010/12/26 Mikkel Meyer Andersen
> Hi,
>
> After a very busy December, I've actually just started on finishing
> MATH-384 and MATH-385 today (as you might see, I've assigned them to
> myself some hours ago). So they should be finished within this week
> (the small suggested changed and tests).
>
And should I finish the patches up in
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/trunk
accordingly? Or do we deal with syncing 2.2 and 3.0 after releasing
3.0?
Cheers, Mikkel.
2010/12/26 Mikkel Meyer Andersen :
> Hi,
>
> After a very busy December, I've actually just started on finishin
Phil,
Here's what we have left:
MATH-327 - Push out to 3.0 or resolve as Invalid?
MATH-383 - Currently assigned to Dmitri. Resolve as Incomplete or Can't
Reproduce?
Indeed, cannot reproduce ... and therefore cannot resolve for the time
being.
Greetings,
Dim.
---
Hi,
After a very busy December, I've actually just started on finishing
MATH-384 and MATH-385 today (as you might see, I've assigned them to
myself some hours ago). So they should be finished within this week
(the small suggested changed and tests).
Just to be sure that I do this correctly. Shoul
Here's what we have left:
MATH-327 - Push out to 3.0 or resolve as Invalid?
MATH-383 - Currently assigned to Dmitri. Resolve as Incomplete or Can't
Reproduce?
MATH-402 - Resolve as WONT_FIX
MATH-434 - Any ideas on this?
MATH-385 - Currently assigned to Mikkel
MATH-364, 456 - I will resolve these
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Pavel Ryzhov wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> The engine I wrote goes as follows:
> 1. Generates N samples (paths) of Ito process with given drift and
> diffusion. It uses simple Euler discretization on equally spaced time scale.
> 2. For each path evaluate some path function
This vote has passed with four +1 votes from the following people:
Jörg Schaible
Oliver Heger
Phil Steitz
Niall Pemberton
Thanks for reviewing the release and the votes.
Niall
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 4:15 AM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> There have been a couple of bugs fixed since the IO 2.0 rele
+1 from me.
Niall
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 4:15 AM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> There have been a couple of bugs fixed since the IO 2.0 release, so I
> would like to release IO 2.0.1
>
> [ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC1
> [ ] -1 No, because...
>
> IO 2.0.1 RC1 is available for review here
Hi Phil,
that's the way how I propose to synchronize pools using proxies
without implementing synchronized wrapper classes, if you don't see
issues about it I can start committing it let you all reviewing.
Please let me know, have a nice day!!!
Simo
{{{
public static ObjectPool synchronizedP
Hi Phil,
+1 for me!
Simo
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> I notice now that in the doco cleanup before pool 1.5, we left one more
> inscrutable "feature" of GKOP undocumented, namely the behavior determi
Hi Phil,
The engine I wrote goes as follows:
1. Generates N samples (paths) of Ito process with given drift and diffusion.
It uses simple Euler discretization on equally spaced time scale.
2. For each path evaluate some path function and provide this value to
SummaryStatistics.
The usage of Su
18 matches
Mail list logo
