Re: [compress] release 1.1?

On 2010-07-20, Torsten Curdt wrote: > ...maybe then there is one more thing to squeeze in then > ...or at least start the discussion so you can think about while lying > in the sun ;-) In my case it's more like herding cats, err, kids. > I was thinking... > whenever one want to get to the prope

RE: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.1

> -Original Message- > From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 03:58 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.1 > > On 21 July 2010 01:01, Henri Yandell wrote: > > Context: > > > >  Releasing a beta version of the Lang

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.1

On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > Henri Yandell wrote: >> Context: >> >>   Releasing a beta version of the Lang 3.0 API for user feedback. >> There aren't any major API changes expected, unless the community >> raises them. The aim would be to _not_ put this in the Maven >> rep

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.1

Henri Yandell wrote: > Context: > > Releasing a beta version of the Lang 3.0 API for user feedback. > There aren't any major API changes expected, unless the community > raises them. The aim would be to _not_ put this in the Maven > repository. Why not push this to the maven repos? I assume it

Re: [compress] release 1.1?

>> Especially as there should be a limit of what you can expect/express. >> After all it describes a file with it's metadata. In theory >> ArchiveEntry could be the superset of all that's there. Looking at the >> various implementations this doesn't seem to be too far fetched. If a >> particular Ar

Re: [jira] Commented: (MATH-389) New superclass for "AbstractScalarDifferentiableOptimizer"

> >  $ svn co http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_1/ > > > > And got this error: > > > >  svn: Repository moved permanently to > > '/viewvc/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_1/'; please relocate > > Not surprising - that is the web interface. > > You need > > $ svn co htt

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.1

Artifacts look good, build works for me on Windows 7 with a JDK 1.5. Build of the site fails due to the missing findbugs-exclude-filter.xml file. As I understand, the site will be reworked later, correct? BTW, if you want, I can write something about the concurrent package. What I find confus

[Digester] Sandbox "annotations" package ready to be revisioned and merged to /trunk

Hi all guys, as discussed and agreed with Rahul[1] last week, I added the missing - hopefully, detailed - package documentation on the "annotations" package on the sandbox digester[2] and merged latest trunk modifications, re-executed tests that still pass. Now I'd ask your help/feedbacks/suggestio

Re: [Digester] Updating POM metadata

Hi all, Thanks for the clarification! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:49 PM, sebb wrote: > On 21 July 2010 20:40, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Simone Tripodi >> wrote: >> >>> * the parent POM is stil

Re: [Digester] Updating POM metadata

On 21 July 2010 20:40, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Simone Tripodi > wrote: > >> * the parent POM is still referenced at version 15; >> * the groupId is still commons-digester and not yet org.apache.commons. >> >> Should that data be modified? > > Change the parent PO

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.1

Chas, First of all, HI! Long time no see. Anyway, it's still slated for 3.0. This beta release is not really intended for the general audiences to be using it in "production" (hence the beta). It's just a "give us feedback" release. So, I wouldn't worry that 462 won't make it in. Your patch

Re: [Digester] Updating POM metadata

In terms of updating: On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all guys, > I've been merging the latest Digester modification to my digester > sandbox and I noticed that: > > * the parent POM is still referenced at version 15; Yes. > * the groupId is still commons-digester a

Re: [Digester] Updating POM metadata

On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > * the parent POM is still referenced at version 15; > * the groupId is still commons-digester and not yet org.apache.commons. > > Should that data be modified? Change the parent POM: Yes. Change the groupId: Most definitely not. This woul

[Digester] Updating POM metadata

Hi all guys, I've been merging the latest Digester modification to my digester sandbox and I noticed that: * the parent POM is still referenced at version 15; * the groupId is still commons-digester and not yet org.apache.commons. Should that data be modified? Simo http://people.apache.org/~simo

RE: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.1

I would love to see Lang-462 included. Thanks, chas -Original Message- From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flame...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 8:01 PM To: Commons Developers List Subject: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.1

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.1

On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 8:31 AM, sebb wrote: > On 21 July 2010 16:12, Henri Yandell wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:10 AM, sebb wrote: >>> On 21 July 2010 12:02, James Carman wrote: On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 6:58 AM, sebb wrote: > > What is the licence for the Spring Framework c

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.1

On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 8:39 AM, sebb wrote: > On 21 July 2010 16:23, Henri Yandell wrote: >> Thanks for the feedback sebb; comments inline: >> >> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:58 AM, sebb wrote: >>> On 21 July 2010 01:01, Henri Yandell wrote: Signed downloads:    http://people.apach

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.1

On 21 July 2010 16:23, Henri Yandell wrote: > Thanks for the feedback sebb; comments inline: > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:58 AM, sebb wrote: >> On 21 July 2010 01:01, Henri Yandell wrote: >>> Context: >>> >>>  Releasing a beta version of the Lang 3.0 API for user feedback. >>> There aren't any

RE: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.1

> -Original Message- > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flame...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 08:24 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.1 > > Thanks for the feedback sebb; comments inline: > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:58 AM, sebb w

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.1

On 21 July 2010 16:12, Henri Yandell wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:10 AM, sebb wrote: >> On 21 July 2010 12:02, James Carman wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 6:58 AM, sebb wrote: What is the licence for the Spring Framework code mentioned in NOTICE? >>> >>> Spring is Apach

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.1

Thanks for the feedback sebb; comments inline: On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:58 AM, sebb wrote: > On 21 July 2010 01:01, Henri Yandell wrote: >> Context: >> >>  Releasing a beta version of the Lang 3.0 API for user feedback. >> There aren't any major API changes expected, unless the community >> rai

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.1

On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:10 AM, sebb wrote: > On 21 July 2010 12:02, James Carman wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 6:58 AM, sebb wrote: >>> >>> What is the licence for the Spring Framework code mentioned in NOTICE? >>> >> >> Spring is Apache License 2.0 > > OK, this needs to be documented in N

Re: [exec] unix-like stream processing

Hi Phillippe, welcome at Commons ... :-) ... the best way to provide a patch is to open a JIRA ticket (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXEC) and add the code. Cheers, Siegfried Goeschl On 21.07.10 14:59, Philippe Marchesseault wrote: Hello, I have developped a few classes that mig

Re: [flyweight] WAS [proxy] 2.0 WAS Re: a bit of commons-style code in search of a home

On Jul 21, 2010, at 8:16 AM, James Carman wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Matt Benson wrote: >> That's why I had thought the flyweight would carry a reference to his object >> as well as to his container. If the container is no longer accessible by >> virtue of its static mapping be

Re: [flyweight] WAS [proxy] 2.0 WAS Re: a bit of commons-style code in search of a home

On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Matt Benson wrote: > That's why I had thought the flyweight would carry a reference to his object > as well as to his container.  If the container is no longer accessible by > virtue of its static mapping being held only weakly, game over. > Yeah, but what happe

Re: [flyweight] WAS [proxy] 2.0 WAS Re: a bit of commons-style code in search of a home

On Jul 21, 2010, at 7:10 AM, James Carman wrote: > The one problem with creating an instance is that the flyweight needs > to be able to get back to his "home" to reconstitute the object. If > it's some instance floating around, that's harder. > That's why I had thought the flyweight would car

[exec] unix-like stream processing

Hello, I have developped a few classes that might be of interest for the Commons Exec project. These classes provide a unix-like functionality by doing stream formatting and filtering. They are of course chainable, 100% Java and come with a few unit tests. The command implemented thus far are

Re: [compress] release 1.1?

> ...maybe then there is one more thing to squeeze in then > ...or at least start the discussion so you can think about while lying > in the sun ;-) Thanks that I am lying in the sun while thinking about your suggestion ;-) > whenever one want to get to the properties of an ArchiveEntry one has >

Re: [flyweight] WAS [proxy] 2.0 WAS Re: a bit of commons-style code in search of a home

The one problem with creating an instance is that the flyweight needs to be able to get back to his "home" to reconstitute the object. If it's some instance floating around, that's harder. On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 2:43 PM, James Carman wrote: > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Matt Benson wrote:

Re: svn commit: r966056 - /commons/proper/lang/trunk/pom.xml

On 21 July 2010 00:34, wrote: > Author: bayard > Date: Tue Jul 20 23:34:12 2010 > New Revision: 966056 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=966056&view=rev > Log: > Moving to snapshot again post the beta tag Can avoid these temporary changes to trunk by: Create fresh workspace from trunk U

Re: [jira] Commented: (MATH-389) New superclass for "AbstractScalarDifferentiableOptimizer"

Changed to dev@ On 21 July 2010 08:50, Gilles Sadowski wrote: >> >>> I ran "mvn site" but could not find the report. What is the file name? >> >> >> >> clirr-report.html >> >> >> >> It should be in top directory. It is generated by clirr-maven-plugin. >> >> You can also try "mvn clirr:check" or "

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.1

On 21 July 2010 12:02, James Carman wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 6:58 AM, sebb wrote: >> >> What is the licence for the Spring Framework code mentioned in NOTICE? >> > > Spring is Apache License 2.0 OK, this needs to be documented in NOTICE or LICENSE. > > --

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-net-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-net-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This is

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.1

On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 6:58 AM, sebb wrote: > > What is the licence for the Spring Framework code mentioned in NOTICE? > Spring is Apache License 2.0 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional c

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.1

On 21 July 2010 01:01, Henri Yandell wrote: > Context: > >  Releasing a beta version of the Lang 3.0 API for user feedback. > There aren't any major API changes expected, unless the community > raises them. The aim would be to _not_ put this in the Maven > repository. > > SVN tag: > >    http://sv

Re: [proxy] 2.0 WAS Re: a bit of commons-style code in search of a home

On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Can you elaborate? UUID transports simply two long values as data in the > object stream. > As I said, I "figured." I guess I never really looked into it. I guess two longs do make a light (object that is). Sorry, couldn't resist. --

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-io-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-io-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This iss

Re: [proxy] 2.0 WAS Re: a bit of commons-style code in search of a home

Hi James, James Carman wrote: > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Jörg Schaible > wrote: >> Interesting idea, but keep the UUID, no need for String conversion ... >> ;-) >> > > I figured the UUID was more "heavyweight" as far as serialization was > concerned. So, that's why I usually just conve