Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

On 2010-06-28, Oliver Heger wrote: > Maybe it helps GUMP to update the Xerces version. No, the version inside the POM doesn't make any difference for Gump because it is completely ignored - you will always get Xerces' trunk from Gump anyway. Stefan --

Re: [scxml-eclipse] Basic website up for project and ppt -> xdoc

2010/6/28 Xun Long Gui : > Fine, thank you. > It means that now i can not deploy the web site by myself, you can help me > to do this. Yes, when you commit changes to the website source in SVN or add new pages, I can deploy for now. > After perms are adjusted, i can do it by myself, am i right

Re: [scxml-eclipse] Basic website up for project and ppt -> xdoc

Fine, thank you. It means that now i can not deploy the web site by myself, you can help me to do this. After perms are adjusted, i can do it by myself, am i right ? BTW, is the perms change job on the way already? What we need is just wait ? 2010/6/29 Rahul Akolkar > 2010/6/28 Xun Long Gui : >

Re: [all][scxml-js] Google Summer of Code Update 3

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Jacob Beard wrote: > Hi Sebb and Rahul, > > I believe i know why it wasn't working. The code relies on a console > API, which is always present in Chrome, but only present in Firefox > when debugging with Firebug. I just added a bit of code to emulate the > API whe

Re: [all][scxml-js] Google Summer of Code Update 3

Hi Sebb and Rahul, I believe i know why it wasn't working. The code relies on a console API, which is always present in Chrome, but only present in Firefox when debugging with Firebug. I just added a bit of code to emulate the API where it is not available. I'd appreciate it if you could please tr

Re: [all][scxml-js] Google Summer of Code Update 3

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 7:13 PM, sebb wrote: > On 28 June 2010 23:13, Jacob Beard wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I posted a quick update on my Google Summer of Code project: >> http://blog.echo-flow.com/2010/06/28/google-summer-of-code-update-3-more-live-demos/ >> >> Please let me know if you have any quest

Re: [all][scxml-js] Google Summer of Code Update 3

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Jacob Beard wrote: > Hi, > > I posted a quick update on my Google Summer of Code project: > http://blog.echo-flow.com/2010/06/28/google-summer-of-code-update-3-more-live-demos/ > > Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. > Cool, here is where th

Re: [scxml][scxml-js] question on "this" object for script module

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Jacob Beard wrote: > Hi, > > Another question I had recently was about the specification of the > script module. In ecmascript, the "this" object can change, and a > developer must be careful to keep track of what "this" is bound to. > From reading the SCXML specif

Re: [all][scxml-js] Google Summer of Code Update 3

On 28 June 2010 23:13, Jacob Beard wrote: > Hi, > > I posted a quick update on my Google Summer of Code project: > http://blog.echo-flow.com/2010/06/28/google-summer-of-code-update-3-more-live-demos/ > > Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. I could not get the demos to work w

Re: [scxml][scxml-js] a few questions on the data module

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Jacob Beard wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently adding support for the data module, and I have a quick > question about the specification that I was hoping you could answer for me. > > For the element, the src attribute can reference a URI containing a > legal data val

Re: [scxml-eclipse] Basic website up for project and ppt -> xdoc

2010/6/28 Xun Long Gui : > In fact, i try to add these codes in my setting.xml configuration file and > try to deploy the web site. > > >      apache.website >      guixl >      mypassword >     > > It give me this response : > > ---

[all][scxml-js] Google Summer of Code Update 3

Hi, I posted a quick update on my Google Summer of Code project: http://blog.echo-flow.com/2010/06/28/google-summer-of-code-update-3-more-live-demos/ Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. Thanks, Jake - To

Re: [lang] When is next release of commons-lang planned?

Honton, Charles wrote: > Be it alpha, beta, or full release: when is a version 3 of commons-lang > going to be available? It's probably this year. - Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additio

Re: [lang] When is next release of commons-lang planned?

Honton, Charles wrote: > Be it alpha, beta, or full release: when is a version 3 of commons-lang > going to be available? It's probably this year. - Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additio

[pool] deprecation of setFactory methods

setFactory belongs to the top level ObjectPool and KeyedObjectPool interfaces. I would like to deprecate these methods uniformly (to be removed in pool 2.0) - removing them from the top level interfaces and deprecating all implementations. There are two reasons for this: 1. Good semantics for thi

Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

Am 28.06.2010 12:09, schrieb sebb: On 28/06/2010, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Le 28/06/2010 10:21, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : commons-configuration's POM lists dependencies on Xerces 2.6.2 and xml-apis 1.0.b2 - at least the Xerces version is pretty old by now. Inside Gump you get the trunk of Xerce

[lang] When is next release of commons-lang planned?

Be it alpha, beta, or full release: when is a version 3 of commons-lang going to be available? Thanks, chas

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community integrati

[scxml][scxml-js] question on "this" object for script module

Hi, Another question I had recently was about the specification of the script module. In ecmascript, the "this" object can change, and a developer must be careful to keep track of what "this" is bound to. >From reading the SCXML specification, I'm not clear what the "this" object should be bound t

[scxml][scxml-js] a few questions on the data module

Hi, I'm currently adding support for the data module, and I have a quick question about the specification that I was hoping you could answer for me. For the element, the src attribute can reference a URI containing a legal data value. I think that what constitutes legal data values is defined in

Re: [scxml-eclipse] Basic website up for project and ppt -> xdoc

In fact, i try to add these codes in my setting.xml configuration file and try to deploy the web site. apache.website guixl mypassword It give me this response : E:\GSoC\workspace\trunk_root>mvn site:deploy [INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO] Searching repository for p

Re: [scxml-eclipse] Basic website up for project and ppt -> xdoc

Hi Rahul, I want to update web site's content, if i want to deploy it, i must set up element in my settings.xml file correctly, but i do not know how to do it. Can you give me an example of your settings.xml file, thank you. 2010/6/27 Rahul Akolka

Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

On 28/06/2010, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 28/06/2010 10:21, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : > > > > commons-configuration's POM lists dependencies on Xerces 2.6.2 and > > xml-apis 1.0.b2 - at least the Xerces version is pretty old by now. > > > > Inside Gump you get the trunk of Xerces and the trunk of x

Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

On 2010-06-28, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Inside Gump you get the trunk of Xerces and the trunk of xml-commons' > java/external. Right now it looks as if Xerces wouldn't see the > xml-apis jar you've downloaded (since that should contain > ElementTranversal). It may be that ElementTraversal ends up

Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

Le 28/06/2010 10:21, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : commons-configuration's POM lists dependencies on Xerces 2.6.2 and xml-apis 1.0.b2 - at least the Xerces version is pretty old by now. Inside Gump you get the trunk of Xerces and the trunk of xml-commons' java/external. Right now it looks as if Xer

Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

On 2010-06-27, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 26/06/2010 15:34, Oliver Heger a écrit : >> Does anybody have an idea what is going on here? It seems that the tests >> related to XML processing are broken. > No idea, this isn't the first time Gump breaks on the test cases > involving a XML parser. > T

Re: HashCodeBuilder.append(boolean) Javadoc Questions

I'd consider the former a bug, latter can piggyback along with it. Release version would be 3.0. On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Sean Mickey wrote: > The Javadoc description for HashCodeBuilder.append(boolean) does not appear > to match the implementation. > And the reference to hashCode handlin