[DAEMON] Procrun Java mode usage

2010-03-19 Thread sebb
I've got a sample "jvm" mode service running OK, and am now trying to understand how Procrun handles the "Java" mode. The "start" function works fine, but "stop" does not. I'm not sure if that's because of a bug in the service code (I'm using ProcrunService.java) or a feature / bug in prunsrv. Pr

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-io-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-03-19 Thread commons-compress development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-io-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This iss

[RESULT][VOTE] Release commons-sandbox-parent 8

2010-03-19 Thread Niall Pemberton
This vote has passed with four +1 votes from the following people: Rahul Akolkar Jörg Schaible Sebastian Bazley Niall Pemberton Thanks Niall On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to release version 8 of the commons-sandbox-parent pom. > > T

Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-03-19 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 18.03.2010 08:47, schrieb Bill Barker: -- From: "Oliver Heger" Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 2:20 PM To: "Commons Developers List" Subject: Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed This is a

Re: [math] Status of MATH-327?

2010-03-19 Thread Ted Dunning
See http://www.amazon.com/Computations-Hopkins-Studies-Mathematical-Sciences/dp/0801854148for the best treatment of this that I know. This is particularly handy in converting Lanczos' algorithm from computing partial eigenvector decompositions into an algorithm for partial SVD. This adjoint appro

Re: [DAEMON] Procrun documentation - --LogJniMessages parameter?

2010-03-19 Thread sebb
On 19/03/2010, Mladen Turk wrote: > On 03/19/2010 06:10 PM, sebb wrote: > > > On 19/03/2010, Mladen Turk wrote: > > > > > On 03/19/2010 05:51 PM, sebb wrote: > > > > > > > > > > prunsrv //? includes > > > > > > > > --LogJniMessages > > > > > > > > which is not documented anywhere as far as I can

Re: [DAEMON] Procrun documentation - --LogJniMessages parameter?

2010-03-19 Thread Mladen Turk
On 03/19/2010 06:10 PM, sebb wrote: On 19/03/2010, Mladen Turk wrote: On 03/19/2010 05:51 PM, sebb wrote: prunsrv //? includes --LogJniMessages which is not documented anywhere as far as I can tell. The parameter takes a numeric value, but what the value is used for, I have no idea. Anyon

Re: [DAEMON] Procrun documentation - --LogJniMessages parameter?

2010-03-19 Thread sebb
On 19/03/2010, Mladen Turk wrote: > On 03/19/2010 05:51 PM, sebb wrote: > > > prunsrv //? includes > > > > --LogJniMessages > > > > which is not documented anywhere as far as I can tell. > > > > The parameter takes a numeric value, but what the value is used for, I > > have no idea. > > > > Anyone

Re: [DAEMON] Procrun documentation - --LogJniMessages parameter?

2010-03-19 Thread Mladen Turk
On 03/19/2010 05:51 PM, sebb wrote: prunsrv //? includes --LogJniMessages which is not documented anywhere as far as I can tell. The parameter takes a numeric value, but what the value is used for, I have no idea. Anyone know so I can update the docs? Sure. I added this recently. It is for

[DAEMON] Procrun documentation - --LogJniMessages parameter?

2010-03-19 Thread sebb
prunsrv //? includes --LogJniMessages which is not documented anywhere as far as I can tell. The parameter takes a numeric value, but what the value is used for, I have no idea. Anyone know so I can update the docs? - To unsub

Re: [math] Status of MATH-327?

2010-03-19 Thread luc . maisonobe
- "Dimitri Pourbaix" a écrit : > Ted, > > > To get an SVD isn't it more common to compute the eigen > decomposition of > > > > [ 0 A' ] > > [ A 0 ] > > > > Rather than A' A? > > Thanks. Never seen that approach but it is mathematically equivalent > indeed. I will try it. I think this

Re: [math] Status of MATH-327?

2010-03-19 Thread Dimitri Pourbaix
Ted, To get an SVD isn't it more common to compute the eigen decomposition of [ 0 A' ] [ A 0 ] Rather than A' A? Thanks. Never seen that approach but it is mathematically equivalent indeed. I will try it. Regards, Dim. ---