Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=297558&projectId=2634
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sun 7 Mar 2010 20:28:57 -0800
Finished at: Sun 7 Mar 2010 20:30:15 -0800
Total time: 1m 18s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bui
The failure is due to the upgrade to Commons Parent 13, which does not
run on Java 1.4
Not sure which plugins are the culprits.
I've reverted Commons Lang 2.x to parent 12 for the time being.
On 08/03/2010, contin...@vmbuild.apache.org wrote:
> Online report :
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/conti
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=297501&projectId=2634
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sun 7 Mar 2010 18:47:42 -0800
Finished at: Sun 7 Mar 2010 18:47:59 -0800
Total time: 16s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bu
On 08/03/2010, nia...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: niallp
> Date: Mon Mar 8 01:06:20 2010
> New Revision: 920167
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=920167&view=rev
> Log:
> Move the maven-javadoc-plugin's configuration out of
> and back to profiles
> (Can't run mvn -Ptrunks-proper
On 08/03/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 2:17 AM, sebb wrote:
>
> > On 03/03/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> >> I have made a couple of more changes following Sebb's comments:
> >> - removed the deprecated parameter
> >> - moved the javadoc/source plugins MANIFEST co
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=297478&projectId=2634
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sun 7 Mar 2010 18:05:05 -0800
Finished at: Sun 7 Mar 2010 18:05:50 -0800
Total time: 45s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bu
I think we had that discussion. I provided examples of other packages
considered sampling to be a key property of a distribution, how users
of these packages expected to be able to sample from distributions.
Others concurred. You vetoed the contribution.
Doesn't bother me that much pers
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=297446&projectId=2634
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Sun 7 Mar 2010 17:28:24 -0800
Finished at: Sun 7 Mar 2010 17:28:47 -0800
Total time: 22s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=297442&projectId=142
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sun 7 Mar 2010 17:21:00 -0800
Finished at: Sun 7 Mar 2010 17:26:16 -0800
Total time: 5m 16s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=297437&projectId=155
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Sun 7 Mar 2010 17:16:31 -0800
Finished at: Sun 7 Mar 2010 17:20:20 -0800
Total time: 3m 48s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Buil
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=297432&projectId=178
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sun 7 Mar 2010 17:12:03 -0800
Finished at: Sun 7 Mar 2010 17:14:52 -0800
Total time: 2m 48s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Buil
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 2:17 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 03/03/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> I have made a couple of more changes following Sebb's comments:
>> - removed the deprecated parameter
>> - moved the javadoc/source plugins MANIFEST config to the
>> section:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=297348&projectId=155
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sun 7 Mar 2010 16:12:50 -0800
Finished at: Sun 7 Mar 2010 16:18:36 -0800
Total time: 5m 46s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Buil
I'm ready to commit the new Convert sub-project to the sandbox. What should I
call it? "convert" seems most logical, but that might cause confusion because
the same thing exists in dormant. Someone suggested "ofbiz-convert" but I'd
really like to make a clean break from OFBiz. Any ideas?
Also,
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Phil Steitz a écrit :
>> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
On 2010-03-07 16:45, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Dennis Lundberg
> wrote:
>> On 2010-03
On Mar 7, 2010, at 1:03 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> It used to be that way, but it has changed. The repo maintainers want to
>>> remove all manual stuff, including anything from Apache that is not
>>> under groupId org.apache.*. We (the ASF) don't want anything pushed to
>>> the central repos
+1 to moving to org.apache.commons. The faster the better.
Paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hello.
>
>> Hmm... no this is not dependent on CM. This is an example that I wrote in 3
>> minutes to illustrate the point.
>>
>> I think the confusion is that I assumed that commons.math distributions
>> supported sampling. I don't think that capability is available eve
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=297313&projectId=155
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Error
Started at: Sun 7 Mar 2010 14:34:31 -0800
Finished at: Sun 7 Mar 2010 14:34:36 -0800
Total time: 5s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
Hello.
> Hmm... no this is not dependent on CM. This is an example that I wrote in 3
> minutes to illustrate the point.
>
> I think the confusion is that I assumed that commons.math distributions
> supported sampling. I don't think that capability is available even now
> (although a user contri
On 2010-03-07 22:53, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Phil Steitz a écrit :
>> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
On 2010-03-07 16:45, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Dennis Lundberg
> wrote:
>> On 2010-03-07 12:41, N
Phil Steitz a écrit :
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>>> On 2010-03-07 16:45, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2010-03-07 12:41, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:1
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>> On 2010-03-07 16:45, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
On 2010-03-07 12:41, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:15 AM, sebb wrote:
>> The
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=296956&projectId=155
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Error
Started at: Sun 7 Mar 2010 11:39:14 -0800
Finished at: Sun 7 Mar 2010 11:39:29 -0800
Total time: 15s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Buil
Hmm... no this is not dependent on CM. This is an example that I wrote in 3
minutes to illustrate the point.
I think the confusion is that I assumed that commons.math distributions
supported sampling. I don't think that capability is available even now
(although a user contributed patches months
On 07/03/2010, nicolas de loof wrote:
> Anyway, after troubles with ASM incompatibility between asm2 and asm3
> releases I'd prefer to have a dedicated package name for a major API change.
>
However, that's not the issue here.
>
>
> > > For such a change to be totally transparent we cannot rel
Anyway, after troubles with ASM incompatibility between asm2 and asm3
releases I'd prefer to have a dedicated package name for a major API change.
> > For such a change to be totally transparent we cannot rely on the
> > relocation feature of Maven, which has been discussed before. We would
> >
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2010-03-07 16:45, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>>> On 2010-03-07 12:41, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:15 AM, sebb wrote:
> The trunk pom.xml refers to 1.5-S
On 2010-03-07 16:45, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>> On 2010-03-07 12:41, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:15 AM, sebb wrote:
The trunk pom.xml refers to 1.5-SNAPSHOT, but it seems to me that the
next release should
Well, sure, I was just hoping there was a way to make match input and output
types.
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Jörg Schaible [mailto:joerg.schai...@gmx.de]
> Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 05:54
> To: dev@commons.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [lang] LANG-510
>
> Gary Gregory wrote:
>
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 3:41 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 07/03/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> > Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> >
>> >> As per comments on the JIRA ticket I'm -1 to changing the groupid
>> >
>> > Well, is upcoming 2.0 binary compati
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2010-03-07 12:41, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:15 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> The trunk pom.xml refers to 1.5-SNAPSHOT, but it seems to me that the
>>> next release should be 2.0 rather 1.5, as IO now requires Java 1.5,
>>
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=296615&projectId=155
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Sun 7 Mar 2010 07:38:35 -0800
Finished at: Sun 7 Mar 2010 07:42:12 -0800
Total time: 3m 37s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Buil
Phil Steitz a écrit :
> Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> As you may have seen, I have implemented a new feature in [math] last
>> few days. It is an extended integrator for ODE that in addition to state
>> y() also provides its jacobians with respect to initial state dy(t)/dy0
>> and with respe
On 07/03/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> > Niall Pemberton wrote:
> >
> >> As per comments on the JIRA ticket I'm -1 to changing the groupid
> >
> > Well, is upcoming 2.0 binary compatible to 1.x ?
>
>
> I just ran the clirr report and th
On 2010-03-07 12:41, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:15 AM, sebb wrote:
>> The trunk pom.xml refers to 1.5-SNAPSHOT, but it seems to me that the
>> next release should be 2.0 rather 1.5, as IO now requires Java 1.5,
>> that requires a major version change.
>
> The plan was to r
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
>> As per comments on the JIRA ticket I'm -1 to changing the groupid
>
> Well, is upcoming 2.0 binary compatible to 1.x ?
I just ran the clirr report and the only thing showing currently as an
error on the clirr repor
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As you may have seen, I have implemented a new feature in [math] last
> few days. It is an extended integrator for ODE that in addition to state
> y() also provides its jacobians with respect to initial state dy(t)/dy0
> and with respect to some ODE parameters dy(
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 14:51 +0100, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
> > As per comments on the JIRA ticket I'm -1 to changing the groupid
>
>
> Well, is upcoming 2.0 binary compatible to 1.x ?
It has to be, otherwise we'd need to change the package names to allow
for concurrent use.
sebb wrote:
> On 06/03/2010, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> I find this a tricky one.
>>
>> When it's explicitly referring to the type, CharSequence seems fine,
>> but to change the text that is talking about what a method does to:
>>
>> "Work out a CharSequence's length"
>>
>> It feels very unwield
Gary Gregory wrote:
> When I replaced the current implementation of StringUtils.left(String,int)
> with:
>
> @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
> public static T left(T cs, int len) {
> if (cs == null) {
> return null;
> }
> if (len < 0) {
> re
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> As per comments on the JIRA ticket I'm -1 to changing the groupid
Well, is upcoming 2.0 binary compatible to 1.x ?
- Jörg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional com
On 07/03/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 2:17 AM, sebb wrote:
> > On 03/03/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> >> I have made a couple of more changes following Sebb's comments:
> >> - removed the deprecated parameter
> >> - moved the javadoc/source plugins MANIFEST con
Hi Folks,
As a commons-io user, I'd like to have at least the old groupId with
a relocation.
WDYT ?
2010/3/7 Niall Pemberton :
> As per comments on the JIRA ticket I'm -1 to changing the groupid
>
> Niall
>
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 2:12 AM, wrote:
>> Author: sebb
>> Date: Sun Mar 7 02:12:26 20
Niall Pemberton a écrit :
> This vote has passed with five +1 votes (three binding) from the
> following people:
>
> Rahul Akolkar
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Mladen Turk
> Phil Steitz
> Niall Pemberton
I thought I voted too (+1), but may have forgotten, sorry for that.
Luc
>
> Niall
>
> On Mon,
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 2:17 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 03/03/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> I have made a couple of more changes following Sebb's comments:
>> - removed the deprecated parameter
>> - moved the javadoc/source plugins MANIFEST config to the
>> section:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org
This vote has passed with five +1 votes (three binding) from the
following people:
Rahul Akolkar
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Mladen Turk
Phil Steitz
Niall Pemberton
Niall
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to release version 13 of the commons-parent pom - the ch
Doh! Forgot to vote - although it seems implied to me.
Anyway I'm +1
Niall
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to release version 13 of the commons-parent pom - the changes
> since the last release are:
>
> - Upgrade to use commons-build-plugin 1.2 (for
Hello,
As you may have seen, I have implemented a new feature in [math] last
few days. It is an extended integrator for ODE that in addition to state
y() also provides its jacobians with respect to initial state dy(t)/dy0
and with respect to some ODE parameters dy(t)/dp.
The underlying algorithm
As per comments on the JIRA ticket I'm -1 to changing the groupid
Niall
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 2:12 AM, wrote:
> Author: sebb
> Date: Sun Mar 7 02:12:26 2010
> New Revision: 919912
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=919912&view=rev
> Log:
> IO-125 wrong groupId value in pom.xml
> Also u
As per comments on the JIRA ticket nothing has changed since this was
reverted - so -1 from me
Niall
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 1:39 AM, wrote:
> Author: sebb
> Date: Sat Mar 6 01:39:28 2010
> New Revision: 919684
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=919684&view=rev
> Log:
> IO-157 FileUtils
I'm still -1 to this - see comments in JIRA ticket
Niall
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 9:31 PM, wrote:
> Author: sebb
> Date: Fri Mar 5 21:31:18 2010
> New Revision: 919627
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=919627&view=rev
> Log:
> IO-181 LineIterator should implement Iterable
>
> Modified:
>
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:15 AM, sebb wrote:
> The trunk pom.xml refers to 1.5-SNAPSHOT, but it seems to me that the
> next release should be 2.0 rather 1.5, as IO now requires Java 1.5,
> that requires a major version change.
The plan was to release it as 2.0 - but IMO its not a requirement.
>
53 matches
Mail list logo
