Henri,
Thank you very much! Please allow me some time to get code committed to the
sandbox - I wasn't expecting things to happen so fast.
I will look into Joda Time - thanks for the heads up.
-Adrian
--- On Thu, 3/4/10, Henri Yandell wrote:
> From: Henri Yandell
> Subject: Re: Introduction
Thanks Mladen/Adrian.
You've got karma to the sandbox now Adrian. Great to have you here,
and feel free to ask questions etc - you'll get lots of feedback.
Generally the aim is to follow the same approach as other projects in
terms of code style/build so that people can easily move over. Don't
do
adrianc
--- On Thu, 3/4/10, Mladen Turk wrote:
> From: Mladen Turk
> Subject: Re: Introduction
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Date: Thursday, March 4, 2010, 9:26 PM
> On 03/05/2010 06:08 AM, Adrian Crum
> wrote:
> > My login? To what? Repo? Jira?
> >
>
> Your apache username, meaning you
On 03/05/2010 06:08 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
My login? To what? Repo? Jira?
Your apache username, meaning you wish the SVN access.
Regards
--
^TM
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional comm
My login? To what? Repo? Jira?
--- On Thu, 3/4/10, Henri Yandell wrote:
> From: Henri Yandell
> Subject: Re: Introduction
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Date: Thursday, March 4, 2010, 8:17 PM
> There's a very in depth and
> bureaucratic membership process.
>
> Q1: What's your login?
> Q2:
Go for it. I think it's at the point now where you could do it and
apologize later if someone gets upset.
Hen
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> Good idea, +1.
>
> Gary Gregory
> Senior Software Engineer
> Seagull Software
> email: ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com
> email: ggreg.
There's a very in depth and bureaucratic membership process.
Q1: What's your login?
Q2: Have you answered Q1? :)
On the Convert codebase - don't feel the need to have to adapt the
existing one unless you want to base your code on it. Stick it in as
'ofbiz-convert' or something and we can argue th
Welcome! I am not on the PMC, but commons is a pretty easy place to work. If
you would like to move Convert from dormant into the sandbox I suspect you
would meet little resistence since the policy here is failry liberal with
respect to giving ASF committers access to the commons sandbox.
Ralph
Hey All,
I have created some JIRA entries with suggestions for improvements to
Commons IO. None of them are especially important, but hopefully nice
to haves. I would appreciate any feedback on the ideas.
Here are the links to the JIRA Entries:
IO-198 Add ability in FileFilterUtils to apply file
Hello all. My name is Adrian Crum and I am a PMC member of the Apache Open For
Business project (OFBiz).
Apache OFBiz is an ERP application, and it contains some technologies that
would be suitable for spinning off into stand-alone libraries.
One of those technologies is a Java object type conv
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=293862&projectId=155
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Thu 4 Mar 2010 10:36:55 -0800
Finished at: Thu 4 Mar 2010 10:39:28 -0800
Total time: 2m 32s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Buil
Good idea, +1.
Gary Gregory
Senior Software Engineer
Seagull Software
email: ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com
email: ggreg...@apache.org
www.seagullsoftware.com
> -Original Message-
> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 11:04
> To: Commons Developers List
As was done recently for DPCP, POOL and CODEC, I'd like to get rid of
all the main() and suite() methods in test cases, and drop the TestAll
or PackageTest classes.
SureFire allows individual tests to be run, and this can easily be
enabled for Ant as well (as has been done for DBCP, POOL, CODEC).
On 04/03/2010, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while investigating an Ant issue I recently had a look at how Harmony
> implements JarInputStream and friends.
>
> If we wanted to enable the usual JarEntry fields on top of
> ZipArchiveInputStream we'd be forced to re-implement the whole
> verif
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=293824&projectId=155
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Thu 4 Mar 2010 09:47:47 -0800
Finished at: Thu 4 Mar 2010 09:50:35 -0800
Total time: 2m 47s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Hi,
while investigating an Ant issue I recently had a look at how Harmony
implements JarInputStream and friends.
If we wanted to enable the usual JarEntry fields on top of
ZipArchiveInputStream we'd be forced to re-implement the whole
verification process for signed jars that the class library ca
16 matches
Mail list logo
