Nice patch, Sebb! Now just combine it with the JUnits from mine! :-p
yours,
Julius
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 5:49 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 02/12/2009, Julius Davies wrote:
>> This current JUnit test "kinda/sorta" covers the static method for
>> non-chunking:
>>
>> public void testSingletons() {
On 02/12/2009, Julius Davies wrote:
> This current JUnit test "kinda/sorta" covers the static method for
> non-chunking:
>
> public void testSingletons() {
> assertEquals("AA==", new String(Base64.encodeBase64(new byte[]{(byte) 0})));
> assertEquals("AQ==", new String(Base64.encodeBase64(new
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
This current JUnit test "kinda/sorta" covers the static method for non-chunking:
public void testSingletons() {
assertEquals("AA==", new String(Base64.encodeBase64(new byte[]{(byte) 0})));
assertEquals("AQ==", new String(Base64.encodeBase64(new byte[]{(byte) 1})));
[...]
}
Especially when
On 02/12/2009, Mat Booth wrote:
> 2009/12/2 sebb :
>
> > On 02/12/2009, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >> What about making the offending class configurable for 1.3 or 1.4
> behavior?
> >
> > How? System property? That's not usually advisable for a library.
> >
> >> The issue becomes which should b
2009/12/2 sebb :
> On 02/12/2009, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> What about making the offending class configurable for 1.3 or 1.4 behavior?
>
> How? System property? That's not usually advisable for a library.
>
>> The issue becomes which should be the default behavior...
>>
>> Should the default behav
Did my email register as a request for sandbox karma?
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Or you could start up a sandbox project. We've had good success with
> ASF committers creating a sandbox branch of a released component, and
> after diving in for a while it's then merge
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Nov 20, 2009, at 2:51 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>
>> Take a look at the proposal and feel free to edit and add any missing
>> info
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ValidationProposal -- looks good to me. Has
> there been a vote by
On Nov 20, 2009, at 2:51 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Take a look at the proposal and feel free to edit and add any missing info
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ValidationProposal -- looks good to me. Has
there been a vote by the Commons community to sponsor?
--kevan
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jexl-1.x has an issue affecting its community integration.
This is
11 matches
Mail list logo
