Did my email register as a request for sandbox karma? On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: > Or you could start up a sandbox project. We've had good success with > ASF committers creating a sandbox branch of a released component, and > after diving in for a while it's then merged in to trunk where they > then become one of the most active coders of that component. > > So +1 to a sandbox branch to primitives if you have ideas you'd like > to play with. ASF committers get karma to the sandbox on request, so > just need you to want to do that and we can add karma. > > Hen > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Stephen, >> >> It's interesting to me that the world in general knows about Trove, >> but not so much this. >> >> The fact that the front page is labelled with a snapshot version might >> have something to do with it, but I am kind of mystified. One thing >> that I'd like to add that Trove has is a full generic object hash map >> that is an open hash to avoid the space bloat of the stock Java >> HashMap. >> >> I am willing to make time to work on this. Since I'm not a committer >> at commons, I'm thinking that my proposed lab is a reasonable place to >> put in some effort and then bring it back into commons. Or maybe I >> should just start teeing up patches at commons? I find that >> reorganizing changes that might be called for to do generics and such >> are really clumsy in patches, so svn cp-ing to a lab might still make >> sense. >> >> I'm copy the labs list to test if I'm making a particle of sense. >> >> --benson >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Stephen Colebourne >> <scolebou...@btopenworld.com> wrote: >>> Benson Margulies wrote: >>>> >>>> I proposed a lab over at labs in which to start construction of >>>> something much like what commons-primitives describes itself as >>>> setting out to do. The web page for primitives suggests a rather >>>> dormant state. Is there anybody in there actively working on >>>> primitives? >>> >>> I think [primitives] is stable and complete, thus appears rather quiet. >>> >>> I'd also point out Joda-Primitives - http://joda-primitives.sourceforge.net/ >>> >>> Its a fork of the concept of [primitives] but with an API design I felt more >>> comfortable with. However, I don't have time to work on it (generify, >>> release). I'll grant access to anyone that wants to help on it. >>> >>> Stephen >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
