Re: Commons Lang 3: Validate

2009-11-18 Thread Henri Yandell
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Paul Benedict wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:35 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Paul Benedict wrote: >>> I would like to make the following changes. Looking for some feedback: >>> >>> * Append var-args to the method signatures t

Re: Commons Lang 3: Validate

2009-11-18 Thread Paul Benedict
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:35 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Paul Benedict wrote: >> I would like to make the following changes. Looking for some feedback: >> >> * Append var-args to the method signatures to accept message format >> parameters where a message is prov

Re: [JEXL 2.0] o.a.c.jexl or o.a.c.jexl2 ?

2009-11-18 Thread Henrib
Jörg Schaible-2 wrote: > > ... > The question is, if it is a drop-in replacement. If not, you may not be > able > to use the new version due to transitive deps. > ... > JEXL 2.0 is a drop-in replacement when JEXL 1.x has been used "casually"; the "core" public API, classes & behaviors have bee

Draft proposal for a JSR-303 Bean Validation incubator podling

2009-11-18 Thread Donald Woods
We have an initial draft proposal to create a JSR-303 Bean Validation implementation at Apache as an incubator podling. Take a look at the proposal [1] and feel free to ask questions about it on the d...@commons list and volunteer to be an initial committer if you have time and interests in be

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-11-18 Thread Donald Woods
I'm sure we'll get a few more interested committers from Geronimo and OpenJPA. Was just waiting until we had an initial proposal draft completed before posting it to those dev lists. I'll go ahead and post to those lists today and maybe we can target you starting a Commons vote in the next w

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-11-18 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: > Apologies for chiming in late. > > From a Geronimo/EE 6 perspective, I'm definitely interested in seeing a 303 > implementation at Apache. I'm not likely to have much time for > implementation. However, if champions or mentors are needed, I'

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons to sponsor agimatec-validation incunbation

2009-11-18 Thread Niall Pemberton
+! from me btw Niall On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > Donald Woods and I have put together a proposal  for the incubator to > bring agimatec-validation into the ASF (see > http://markmail.org/message/xv4p6twshqznxfcp). The draft proposal is > here: > > http://wiki.apache

[VOTE] Apache Commons to sponsor agimatec-validation incunbation

2009-11-18 Thread Niall Pemberton
Donald Woods and I have put together a proposal for the incubator to bring agimatec-validation into the ASF (see http://markmail.org/message/xv4p6twshqznxfcp). The draft proposal is here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ValidationProposal agimatec-validation is an implementation of JSR 303 - th

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-11-18 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Donald Woods wrote: > OK, I finished my first rounds of updates. If we want Apache Commons to be sponsor then we should hold a vote here first. >  Looks like we just need to nail > down a champion and we can add more mentors once we propose it to the > incubator.

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-11-18 Thread Donald Woods
OK, I finished my first rounds of updates. Looks like we just need to nail down a champion and we can add more mentors once we propose it to the incubator -Donald Niall Pemberton wrote: Lets start a proposal on the incubator wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ I've set up a ske

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-11-18 Thread Kevan Miller
Apologies for chiming in late. From a Geronimo/EE 6 perspective, I'm definitely interested in seeing a 303 implementation at Apache. I'm not likely to have much time for implementation. However, if champions or mentors are needed, I'd be willing to help. On Nov 4, 2009, at 11:27 AM, Donald Wood

Re: Comments on Commons Lang 3.0-SNAPSHOT

2009-11-18 Thread Paul Benedict
Probably because both compile down into max(Object[]). But when I read Joshua Bloch's Effective Java, he recommends doing something like this: max(double, double) max(double, double, double) max(double, double, double, double...) That would be nice. The behind-the-sceneds Object[] creation only h

Re: [JEXL 2.0] o.a.c.jexl or o.a.c.jexl2 ?

2009-11-18 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi, Henrib wrote at Mittwoch, 18. November 2009 00:53: > > > > Paul Benedict-2 wrote: >> >> ... >> Do you think this is beneficial to your users? >> ... >> > Who are JEXL users today? http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/commons-jexl/commons-jexl/1.1 Most prominent: Maven 1, ServiceMix and c