On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Kevan Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> Apologies for chiming in late.
>
> From a Geronimo/EE 6 perspective, I'm definitely interested in seeing a 303 
> implementation at Apache. I'm not likely to have much time for 
> implementation. However, if champions or mentors are needed, I'd be willing 
> to help.

Great - I added you to the proposal - thanks

Niall

> On Nov 4, 2009, at 11:27 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
>
>> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>>> Its the normal route to have separate lists @incubator - but I don't
>>> see why it has to go that way. If Commons is the intended destination
>>> then it will make acceptance by Commons smoother since they will see
>>> the activity during incubation. Anyway, I'm not wedded to this idea
>>> but I would like to start with that basis - if there is a negative
>>> reaction either here or if/when it goes to gene...@incubator then we
>>> can revert to the usual model. Is your objection because you don't
>>> like it or because you don't think it would be allowed?
>>
>> No objection.  I just hadn't seen any other Podlings do it this way... It's 
>> worth a try.
>
> Subversion is going to be using non-incubator mailing lists. So, there is 
> some precedent. No harm in trying, IMO...
>
> --kevan
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to