On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Ceki Gulcu wrote:
> Hi Ralph and co,
>
> The issue has been raised on the Maven list about 5 times, and if I
> remember correctly, it was raised by yourself once or twice. However,
> I am not aware of any progress on the issue.
>
> Anyway, my request involves allow
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Sam Halliday wrote:
> I personally have no problems with my MTJ contributions being released
> Apache. Bjorn-Ove is the person to talk to about the bulk of MTJ. I'll ask
> him!
>
Great.
MTJ depends on netlib-java, which is technically a translation of the
> origi
Replies inline:
Ted Dunning wrote:
>
>> As a start, I'd like to discourage the use of a solid implementation for
>> SparseReal{Vector, Matrix}... please prefer an interface approach,
>> allowing
>> implementations based on the Templates project:-
>
> Can you say more about what aspects of the
Ted Dunning a écrit :
> Dang.
>
> That is fast.
>
> What size matrices was this for?
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>
>> Some benchmarks I did a few weeks ago showed the new [math] linear
>> package implementation was quite fast and compared very well with native
>>
Dang.
That is fast.
What size matrices was this for?
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Some benchmarks I did a few weeks ago showed the new [math] linear
> package implementation was quite fast and compared very well with native
> fortran libraries for QR decomposition wi
Ted Dunning a écrit :
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Sam Halliday wrote:
>
>> I am a maintainer of the matrix-toolkits-java
>
>
> Which is an impressive piece of work, especially the transparent but
> non-binding interface to the Atlas and Blas native packages. My compliments
> to Bjørn-Ove
On Wednesday 13 May 2009 18:37:09 Steve Cohen wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I've been out of the FTP "game" for several years and now I need to get
> back in. I have a requirement to set up a secure FTP connection with
> another organization, so naturally, I look to commons-net first as a
> solution. I notice
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Sam Halliday wrote:
>
> I am a maintainer of the matrix-toolkits-java
Which is an impressive piece of work, especially the transparent but
non-binding interface to the Atlas and Blas native packages. My compliments
to Bjørn-Ove and all who have followed up on hi
On 14/05/2009, Steve Brewer wrote:
> I ran into this issue using commons-beanutils through Jasper Reports.
> FloatLocalConverter.parse throws an exception for valid floats less than or
> equal to 0. The code parses the value into a double, which it then checks to
> make sure is a value float.
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=191398&projectId=136
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Error
Started at: Thu 14 May 2009 08:37:45 -0700
Finished at: Thu 14 May 2009 08:38:12 -0700
Total time: 26s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=191397&projectId=165
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Error
Started at: Thu 14 May 2009 08:37:10 -0700
Finished at: Thu 14 May 2009 08:37:40 -0700
Total time: 29s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=191396&projectId=362
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Error
Started at: Thu 14 May 2009 08:36:28 -0700
Finished at: Thu 14 May 2009 08:36:55 -0700
Total time: 27s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=191395&projectId=163
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Error
Started at: Thu 14 May 2009 08:35:38 -0700
Finished at: Thu 14 May 2009 08:36:10 -0700
Total time: 32s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=191394&projectId=178
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Building
Started at: Thu 14 May 2009 08:34:07 -0700
Finished at: Thu 14 May 2009 08:35:24 -0700
Total time: 1m 17s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Hi Ralph and co,
The issue has been raised on the Maven list about 5 times, and if I
remember correctly, it was raised by yourself once or twice. However,
I am not aware of any progress on the issue.
Anyway, my request involves allowing commons-logging v99 to be
published on ibiblio. This needs
I ran into this issue using commons-beanutils through Jasper Reports.
FloatLocalConverter.parse throws an exception for valid floats less than or
equal to 0. The code parses the value into a double, which it then checks to
make sure is a value float. It checks posDouble < Float.MIN_VALUE, whi
I would suggest bringing this up on the Maven dev list. I could see
adding this as a feature to 3.0 to allow artifacts to be "redirected"
to a replacement artifact.
On May 14, 2009, at 2:23 AM, Ceki Gulcu wrote:
Hello all,
A large number of Maven projects declare commons-logging as a
depen
/commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/pool/impl/GenericObjectPool.java
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 07:23:50 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> From: Phil Steitz
>
> Can you explain - maybe in the JIRA - what the problem is here and how
> the change fixes it? I
On 14/05/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 14/05/2009, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:35 AM, sebb wrote:
> >
> > > Has anyone tried declaring commons logging as system ?
> >
> >
> > Beg your pardon, but this is against any use of transitive
> > dependencies. Likewise for "pr
Dear all,
I am a maintainer of the matrix-toolkits-java
http://code.google.com/p/matrix-toolkits-java/
which is a comprehensive collection of matrix data structures, linear
solvers, least squares methods, eigenvalue and singular value
decompositions.
This note is in regard to the commons-mat
I myself use slf4j and this "99" hack
Using en empty "commons-logging-0.0-null.jar" would NOT break the LATEST
keyword resolution and could be forced from project
(with provided scope)
This would be a nice solution to globaly exclude xommons-logging without
breaking existing builds
Nicolas
200
On 14/05/2009, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:35 AM, sebb wrote:
>
> > Has anyone tried declaring commons logging as system ?
>
>
> Beg your pardon, but this is against any use of transitive
> dependencies. Likewise for "provided", of course. If it is a
> dependency, then
Jörg Schaible wrote:
Use scope "provided" - if any. Actually if people use a master pom and
declare CL in the depMgmt section with this scope, it should do the trick.
Provided just means that the artifact will not be included in the
packaged application. However, during development, within t
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:35 AM, sebb wrote:
> Has anyone tried declaring commons logging as system ?
Beg your pardon, but this is against any use of transitive
dependencies. Likewise for "provided", of course. If it is a
dependency, then it is. If anyone else intends to replace it, okay,
but t
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Ceki Gulcu wrote:
> Would the Apache Commons community, out of courtesy to developers,
> consent to commons-logging version "99.0-does-not-exist" to be
> published in the main maven repository?
No, never do that! It possibly breaks any algorithm that attempts to
sebb wrote:
Has anyone tried declaring commons logging as system ?
Won't that stop it being added to the classpath?
I have not tries this but wouldn't declaring a dependency in the
system scope force the artifact to be present on the file system of
the host to begin with?
--
Ceki Gülcü
Log
sebb wrote at Donnerstag, 14. Mai 2009 11:35:
> On 14/05/2009, Ceki Gulcu wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> A large number of Maven projects declare commons-logging as a
>> dependency. Thus, if a developer wishes to use jcl-over-slf4j instead
>> of commons-logging, he or she would need to declare a c
On 14/05/2009, Ceki Gulcu wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> A large number of Maven projects declare commons-logging as a
> dependency. Thus, if a developer wishes to use jcl-over-slf4j instead
> of commons-logging, he or she would need to declare a commons-logging
> exclusion in all of his/her dependen
>> The name of the new project isn't the point of this discussion at all. Right
>> now I don't give a damn about the name.
>
> The point (at least mine) is that we don't *need* to create a new
> project here. We have the ability (if we jump major version numbers
> and change package names) to be i
Hello all,
A large number of Maven projects declare commons-logging as a
dependency. Thus, if a developer wishes to use jcl-over-slf4j instead
of commons-logging, he or she would need to declare a commons-logging
exclusion in all of his/her dependencies which transitively depend on
commons-loggin
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=191354&projectId=116
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Thu 14 May 2009 01:31:16 -0700
Finished at: Thu 14 May 2009 01:33:23 -0700
Total time: 2m 7s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bui
> Typically Apache projects who use
> release:stage use it *instead* of release:perform.
100% agree with the :stage instead of :perform!
> We can't do it quite like that, because release:perform creates a new binary;
> we
> have to vote on the final binary.
Also a _very_ philosophic top
32 matches
Mail list logo
