Hi Dan,
it would be highly appreciated if you could update the wiki :-)
Thanks in advance
Siegfried Goeschl
Dan Fabulich wrote:
> OK, so, my new plan is:
>
> cd /www/www.apache.org/dist/commons/dbutils/binaries/
> cp
> /www/people.apache.org/builds/commons/dbutils/1.2/RC3/staged/commons-db
John Bollinger wrote at Mittwoch, 22. April 2009 18:17:
> Ralph Goers wrote:
>> What is next for Commons Logging? Is there any point in enhancing it to
>> emulate SLF4J? Should it just stay more or less as it is while it slowly
>> loses its customer base?
>
> I think the most appropriate use case
On Apr 22, 2009, at 8:45 AM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
What if one would create an JCL 2.0 experimental branch?
Would that be OK for everyone?
I think that would be great. It appears that the logging page on the
wiki already has a start for ideas for 2.0. I would really like to see
John expand
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by ChristianGrobmeier:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CompressRoadmap
--
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by ChristianGrobmeier:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/Compress
The comment on the change is:
added finish() to examples
---
OK, so, my new plan is:
cd /www/www.apache.org/dist/commons/dbutils/binaries/
cp
/www/people.apache.org/builds/commons/dbutils/1.2/RC3/staged/commons-dbutils/commons-dbutils/1.2/*bin*
.
cd ../source
cp
/www/people.apache.org/builds/commons/dbutils/1.2/RC3/staged/commons-dbutils/commons-dbutils
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by sebbapache:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases
The comment on the change is:
Need to delete old releases
--
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Dan Fabulich wrote:
>
> OK, then here's what I think I want to do:
>
> cd /www/www.apache.org/dist/commons/dbutils
> rm *current*
Instead, for the symlinks, look in the committers SVN repo (under
tools/releases) -- theres a symlinks.sh that makes the clobbering y
OK, then here's what I think I want to do:
cd /www/www.apache.org/dist/commons/dbutils
rm *current*
cd binaries
cp
/www/people.apache.org/builds/commons/dbutils/1.2/RC3/staged/commons-dbutils/commons-dbutils/1.2/*bin*
.
cd ../source
cp
/www/people.apache.org/builds/commons/dbutils/1.2/RC3/sta
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>
>
>
> --- On Wed, 4/22/09, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>
>> From: Carsten Ziegeler
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Sanselan as a Commons library
>> To: "Commons Developers List"
>> Date: Wednesday, April 22, 2009, 4:42 AM
>> Phil Steitz wrote
>> > We
--- On Wed, 4/22/09, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> From: Carsten Ziegeler
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Sanselan as a Commons library
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Date: Wednesday, April 22, 2009, 4:42 AM
> Phil Steitz wrote
> > We have a rule of thumb here that in order to graduate
> a component
Ralph Goers wrote:
> What is next for Commons Logging? Is there any point in enhancing it to
> emulate SLF4J? Should it just stay more or less as it is while it slowly
> loses its customer base?
I think the most appropriate use case for Commons Logging always has been for
small components inten
What if one would create an JCL 2.0 experimental branch?
Would that be OK for everyone?
cheers
--
Torsten
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
On Apr 22, 2009, at 7:38 AM, sebb wrote:
I could be wrong here, but it seems to me that SLF4J also relies on
the ClassLoader to find the implementation.
It's not clear whether Pluto would work if the properties file were
used to define the CL implementation.
It may be that CL cannot work wit
Ralph Goers wrote:
>I'm still at a loss as to how this conversation has devolved to this. This
>post was meant as an example as to why yet another project is switching away
>from Commons Logging.
You are right. I apologize for taking the discussion so far afield.
Any comments ?
The original commit of the LICENSE file record is here:
http://markmail.org/message/u4q4gujknhwx3lwl
Jack Cai wrote:
>
> I notice that there is a LICENSE file located at
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/daemon/trunk/src/native/nt/procrun/LICENSE.
> It includes
On 22/04/2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Apr 21, 2009, at 11:11 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>
>
> > Hi Ralph,
> >
> > Ralph Goers wrote at Mittwoch, 22. April 2009 05:19:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >
> > > Does it really matter that you understand what they are trying to do?
> > > What should matter is wh
On Apr 21, 2009, at 11:11 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Ralph,
Ralph Goers wrote at Mittwoch, 22. April 2009 05:19:
[snip]
Does it really matter that you understand what they are trying to do?
What should matter is what they are trying to do doesn't work
properly
and they couldn't find a w
n 22/04/2009, Dan Fabulich wrote:
>
> I'm following the documentation here:
> http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases
>
> At step E.1 it says I'm supposed to "Copy distributions to the Commons
> dist/ area".
>
> Copy what where exactly? There's a bunch of files here in:
> /www/people.a
Phil Steitz wrote:
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>> Phil Steitz wrote
>>
>>> We have a rule of thumb here that in order to graduate a component from
>>> the sandbox to commons proper, we need to have 3 committers willing to
>>> work on it (which means more than just "oversight" - more like active
>>>
I'm following the documentation here:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases
At step E.1 it says I'm supposed to "Copy distributions to the Commons
dist/ area".
Copy what where exactly? There's a bunch of files here in:
/www/people.apache.org/builds/commons/dbutils/1.2/RC3/staged/
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote
We have a rule of thumb here that in order to graduate a component from
the sandbox to commons proper, we need to have 3 committers willing to
work on it (which means more than just "oversight" - more like active
involvement). This is not a hard and
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integrati
- "Bill Barker" a écrit :
> I can't compile commons-math any longer due to the below errors. It
> seems
> that some 1.6 methods have creaped in. I have no problem upgrading to
> 1.6
> if that is what is necessary, but I thought 1.5 was the targeted
> version.
Yes, it is for now the targ
Phil Steitz wrote
> We have a rule of thumb here that in order to graduate a component from
> the sandbox to commons proper, we need to have 3 committers willing to
> work on it (which means more than just "oversight" - more like active
> involvement). This is not a hard and fast rule, but somethi
Vote passed, unanimous +1s. (I just hope I identified roles correctly
below...)
http://people.apache.org/~jim/projects.html#commons
Joerg Schaible (Commons PMC)
Dan Fabulich (Commons Committer)
Liam Coughlin
Dave Miekle
Henri Yandell (Commons PMC)
Phil Steitz (Commons PMC)
Dan Fabulich wrote:
26 matches
Mail list logo
