Phil Steitz wrote: > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >> Phil Steitz wrote >> >>> We have a rule of thumb here that in order to graduate a component from >>> the sandbox to commons proper, we need to have 3 committers willing to >>> work on it (which means more than just "oversight" - more like active >>> involvement). This is not a hard and fast rule, but something we like >>> to adhere to. We already have too many "dormant" components that should >>> be moving out to the attic one day, so we aren't keen on promoting >>> sandbox components or taking on codebases that we can't generate >>> committer interest in. So lets see what level of interest we can >>> generate here for Sanselan. We welcome all ASF committers at commons >>> and we don't have a tremendously high bar for contributors who stick >>> around long enough and play nice, so if we can get some volunteers to >>> express interest, we can move forward. >>> >>> >> I think at least all or nearly most of the current Sanselan >> committers, e.g. >> Charles, Philipp and myself will be committed to Sanselan. >> >> > Great. That satisfies my only concern. I think the administrative > items can be sorted out fairly easily, so I am +1 for welcoming this > codebase and community into commons. I guess the next step is to > decide whether to start in the sandbox or proper and then kick off a vote. > > From my perspective, proper is appropriate as the component has had a > release. I will give others a chance to weigh in on this and then kick > off the acceptance vote. > Cool! Thanks Phil!
Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
